Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2018

01-02-2018 | Original Article

The use of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an analysis of 5016 patients from 305 designated cancer care hospitals in Japan

Authors: Yoichiro Tsukada, Takahiro Higashi, Hideaki Shimada, Yoshinori Kikuchi, Atsuro Terahara

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have shown the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of our study was to elucidate the use of neoadjuvant therapy for thoracic ESCC in Japan.

Methods

Data on patients with stage IB–III thoracic ESCC were retrieved from the national database of hospital-based cancer registries combined with claims data between 2012 and 2013. These data were analyzed using a mixed-effect logistic regression analysis, with a focus on exploring patterns in the first-line treatment for ESCC, including proportion of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, and investigating the hospital characteristics and patient factors associated with the use of neoadjuvant therapy.

Results

Of the 5016 patients with stage IB–III thoracic ESCC at the 305 participating hospitals, 34.2% received neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 29.5%; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 4.7%). The therapy was less likely to be administered to older patients (≤64 years, 48.8%; 65–70 years, 42.0%; 70–75 years, 33.9%; 75–80 years, 22.2%; 80–85 years, 3.8%; ≥85 years, 1.4%) and at hospitals with a low volume of patients (very high, 42.1%; high, 37.5%; low, 30.7%; and very low, 26.4%). This trend was confirmed by regression analysis.

Conclusions

Based on our results, in Japan, relatively few patients with resectable locally advanced thoracic ESCC receive neoadjuvant therapy, with older patients and patients at lower volume hospitals being less likely than other patients to receive the neoadjuvant therapy. We recommend that the process of treatment decision-making be assessed at both the patient and hospital levels so that patients can consider various treatment options, including neoadjuvant therapy with surgery in Japan.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J SI, Ervik M, Dikshit R, et al. (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed July 2016 Ferlay J SI, Ervik M, Dikshit R, et al. (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr. Accessed July 2016
2.
go back to reference Ando N, Iizuka T, Ide H, et al. (2003) Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study—JCOG9204. J Clin Oncol 21(24):4592–4596CrossRefPubMed Ando N, Iizuka T, Ide H, et al. (2003) Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study—JCOG9204. J Clin Oncol 21(24):4592–4596CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74CrossRefPubMed Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098CrossRefPubMed Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference The Japan Esophageal Society (2012) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatments of esophageal cancer. Kanehara Co. Ltd, Tokyo (in Japanese) The Japan Esophageal Society (2012) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatments of esophageal cancer. Kanehara Co. Ltd, Tokyo (in Japanese)
7.
go back to reference Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. (2016) Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v50–v57CrossRefPubMed Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. (2016) Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v50–v57CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Little AG, Lerut AE, Harpole DH, et al. (2014) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guidelines on the role of multimodality treatment for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1880–1885CrossRefPubMed Little AG, Lerut AE, Harpole DH, et al. (2014) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guidelines on the role of multimodality treatment for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1880–1885CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Molena D, Mungo B, Stem M, et al. (2015) Does quality of care matter? A study of adherence to national comprehensive cancer network guidelines for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1739–1747CrossRefPubMed Molena D, Mungo B, Stem M, et al. (2015) Does quality of care matter? A study of adherence to national comprehensive cancer network guidelines for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1739–1747CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Suntharalingam M, Moughan J, Coia LR, et al. (2005) Outcome results of the 1996–1999 patterns of care survey of the national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23:2325–2331CrossRefPubMed Suntharalingam M, Moughan J, Coia LR, et al. (2005) Outcome results of the 1996–1999 patterns of care survey of the national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23:2325–2331CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Smith GL, Smith BD, Buchholz TA, et al. (2009) Patterns of care and locoregional treatment outcomes in older esophageal cancer patients: the SEER-Medicare Cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:482–489CrossRefPubMed Smith GL, Smith BD, Buchholz TA, et al. (2009) Patterns of care and locoregional treatment outcomes in older esophageal cancer patients: the SEER-Medicare Cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:482–489CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Neville B, Weeks JC, et al. (2007) Referral patterns, treatment choices, and outcomes in locoregional esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis of elderly patients. J Clin Oncol 25:2389–2396CrossRefPubMed Steyerberg EW, Neville B, Weeks JC, et al. (2007) Referral patterns, treatment choices, and outcomes in locoregional esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis of elderly patients. J Clin Oncol 25:2389–2396CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Molena D, Stem M, Blackford AL, et al. (2017) Esophageal cancer treatment is underutilized among elderly patients in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg 21:126–136CrossRefPubMed Molena D, Stem M, Blackford AL, et al. (2017) Esophageal cancer treatment is underutilized among elderly patients in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg 21:126–136CrossRefPubMed
14.
17.
go back to reference Iwamoto M, Nakamura F, Higashi T (2016) Monitoring and evaluating the quality of cancer care in Japan using administrative claims data. Cancer Sci 107:68–75CrossRefPubMed Iwamoto M, Nakamura F, Higashi T (2016) Monitoring and evaluating the quality of cancer care in Japan using administrative claims data. Cancer Sci 107:68–75CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Higashi T, Nakamura F, Shibata A, et al. (2014) The national database of hospital-based cancer registries: a nationwide infrastructure to support evidence-based cancer care and cancer control policy in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44:2–8CrossRefPubMed Higashi T, Nakamura F, Shibata A, et al. (2014) The national database of hospital-based cancer registries: a nationwide infrastructure to support evidence-based cancer care and cancer control policy in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44:2–8CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. (2013) Three-arm phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-FU (DCF) versus radiotherapy with CF (CF-RT) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer (JCOG1109, NExT study). Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:752–755CrossRefPubMed Nakamura K, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. (2013) Three-arm phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-FU (DCF) versus radiotherapy with CF (CF-RT) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer (JCOG1109, NExT study). Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:752–755CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, et al. (2005) Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 6:659–668CrossRefPubMed Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, et al. (2005) Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 6:659–668CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bradley JD, Paulus R, Graham MV, et al. (2005) Phase II trial of postoperative adjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in resected stage II and IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: promising long-term results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group—RTOG 9705. J Clin Oncol 23:3480–3487CrossRefPubMed Bradley JD, Paulus R, Graham MV, et al. (2005) Phase II trial of postoperative adjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in resected stage II and IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: promising long-term results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group—RTOG 9705. J Clin Oncol 23:3480–3487CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. (2011) Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:684–690CrossRefPubMed Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. (2011) Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:684–690CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lester SC, Lin SH, Chuong M, et al. (2017) A multi-institutional analysis of trimodality therapy for esophagus cancer in elderly patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:820–828 Lester SC, Lin SH, Chuong M, et al. (2017) A multi-institutional analysis of trimodality therapy for esophagus cancer in elderly patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:820–828
25.
go back to reference Pultrum BB, Bosch DJ, Nijsten MW, et al. (2010) Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1572–1580CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pultrum BB, Bosch DJ, Nijsten MW, et al. (2010) Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1572–1580CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Ruol A, Portale G, Zaninotto G, et al. (2007) Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1186–1192CrossRefPubMed Ruol A, Portale G, Zaninotto G, et al. (2007) Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1186–1192CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sylvie L, Silvia S, Salah-Eddin AB, et al. (2015) Impact of age on the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 51:1918–1926CrossRefPubMed Sylvie L, Silvia S, Salah-Eddin AB, et al. (2015) Impact of age on the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 51:1918–1926CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Fogh SE, Yu A, Kubicek GJ, et al. (2011) Do elderly patients experience increased perioperative or postoperative morbidity or mortality when given neoadjuvant chemoradiation before esophagectomy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:1372–1376CrossRefPubMed Fogh SE, Yu A, Kubicek GJ, et al. (2011) Do elderly patients experience increased perioperative or postoperative morbidity or mortality when given neoadjuvant chemoradiation before esophagectomy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:1372–1376CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hamamoto Y, Akutsu Y, Nagashima F, et al. (2016) Multicenter questionnaire survey on patterns of care for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:111–115CrossRefPubMed Hamamoto Y, Akutsu Y, Nagashima F, et al. (2016) Multicenter questionnaire survey on patterns of care for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:111–115CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Brannstrom F, Bjerregaard JK, Winbladh A, et al. (2015) Multidisciplinary team conferences promote treatment according to guidelines in rectal cancer. Acta Oncol 54:447–453CrossRefPubMed Brannstrom F, Bjerregaard JK, Winbladh A, et al. (2015) Multidisciplinary team conferences promote treatment according to guidelines in rectal cancer. Acta Oncol 54:447–453CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Fujita H, Ozawa S, Kuwano H, et al. (2010) Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals. Dis Esophagus 23:145–152CrossRefPubMed Fujita H, Ozawa S, Kuwano H, et al. (2010) Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals. Dis Esophagus 23:145–152CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Munasinghe A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, et al. (2014) Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg 262:79–85CrossRef Munasinghe A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, et al. (2014) Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg 262:79–85CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, et al. (2017) Does postoperative morbidity worsen the oncological outcome after radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancers? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 1:11–23CrossRef Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, et al. (2017) Does postoperative morbidity worsen the oncological outcome after radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancers? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 1:11–23CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Speicher PJ, Ganapathi AM, Englum BR, et al. (2014) Induction therapy does not improve survival for clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Oncol 9:1195–1201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Speicher PJ, Ganapathi AM, Englum BR, et al. (2014) Induction therapy does not improve survival for clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Oncol 9:1195–1201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Markar SR, Gronnier C, Pasquer A, et al. (2016) Role of neoadjuvant treatment in clinical T2N0M0 oesophageal cancer: results from a retrospective multi-center European study. Eur J Cancer 56:59–68CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Gronnier C, Pasquer A, et al. (2016) Role of neoadjuvant treatment in clinical T2N0M0 oesophageal cancer: results from a retrospective multi-center European study. Eur J Cancer 56:59–68CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Wong IY-H, Law S (2016) Surgery in the era of neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus. Esophagus 13(2):105–109CrossRef Wong IY-H, Law S (2016) Surgery in the era of neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus. Esophagus 13(2):105–109CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12:681–692CrossRefPubMed Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12:681–692CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Kranzfelder M, Schuster T, Geinitz H, et al. (2011) Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant treatment modalities and definitive non-surgical therapy for oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Br J Surg 98:768–783CrossRefPubMed Kranzfelder M, Schuster T, Geinitz H, et al. (2011) Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant treatment modalities and definitive non-surgical therapy for oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Br J Surg 98:768–783CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Ikegami N, Yoo BK, Hashimoto H, et al. (2011) Japanese universal health coverage: evolution, achievements, and challenges. Lancet 378:1106–1115CrossRefPubMed Ikegami N, Yoo BK, Hashimoto H, et al. (2011) Japanese universal health coverage: evolution, achievements, and challenges. Lancet 378:1106–1115CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
go back to reference Al-Refaie WB, Muluneh B, Zhong W, et al. (2012) Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals? J Am Coll Surg 214:81–87CrossRefPubMed Al-Refaie WB, Muluneh B, Zhong W, et al. (2012) Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals? J Am Coll Surg 214:81–87CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Zhang J, Peng F, Li N, et al. (2012) Salvage concurrent radio-chemotherapy for post-operative local recurrence of squamous-cell esophageal cancer. Radiat Oncol 7:93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang J, Peng F, Li N, et al. (2012) Salvage concurrent radio-chemotherapy for post-operative local recurrence of squamous-cell esophageal cancer. Radiat Oncol 7:93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Yoo C, Park JH, Yoon DH, et al. (2012) Salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 94:1862–1868CrossRefPubMed Yoo C, Park JH, Yoon DH, et al. (2012) Salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 94:1862–1868CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The use of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an analysis of 5016 patients from 305 designated cancer care hospitals in Japan
Authors
Yoichiro Tsukada
Takahiro Higashi
Hideaki Shimada
Yoshinori Kikuchi
Atsuro Terahara
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1178-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine