Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2008

01-06-2008

The Use of CEEA 34 in Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy: Suggested Modifications in Technique

Authors: M. H. Chew, W. S. Tan, K. W. Eu

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy has been shown to be superior to conventional hemorrhoidectomy in numerous randomized, controlled trials and systemic reviews, with less postoperative pain and faster recovery. Premium Plus CEEA 34 has been recently introduced for use in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. The use of this stapler requires some modifications in technique.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230PubMedCrossRef Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785PubMedCrossRef Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781PubMedCrossRef Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidectomy: our experience. Tech Coloproctol 10:43–46PubMedCrossRef Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidectomy: our experience. Tech Coloproctol 10:43–46PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053PubMedCrossRef Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs.closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1374PubMedCrossRef Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs.closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1374PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ng KH, Chew MH, Eu KW (2008) Modified stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a suggested improved technique. Aust NZ J Surg (in press) Ng KH, Chew MH, Eu KW (2008) Modified stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a suggested improved technique. Aust NZ J Surg (in press)
9.
go back to reference Plocek MD, Kondylis LA, Duhan-Flowy N, Reilly JC, et al. (2006) Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1905–1909PubMedCrossRef Plocek MD, Kondylis LA, Duhan-Flowy N, Reilly JC, et al. (2006) Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1905–1909PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Use of CEEA 34 in Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy: Suggested Modifications in Technique
Authors
M. H. Chew
W. S. Tan
K. W. Eu
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9403-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

World Journal of Surgery 6/2008 Go to the issue

Letter

Reply