Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2016

01-12-2016 | Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY

The use of a “rim cutter” device and a flanged cup for improving the mantle of the acetabular component of a cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasty

Authors: Jenaro Ángel Fernández-Valencia, Xavier Gallart, Guillem Bori, Juan Miguel Rodríguez-Roiz, Andreu Combalia

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the cement mantle in two groups of patients treated with the acetabular components of cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Two groups of 20 patients were compared: Group 1 received non-flanged acetabular cemented cups (Contemporary, Stryker) and Group 2 received flanged acetabular cemented cups (X3 Rim Fit, Stryker). Cups in Group 2 were implanted after using a rim cutter device. Group 2 showed better penetration of cement in zone 1 (10.76 mm compared with 2.93 mm; p = 0.008) and a thicker cement mantle in zone 1 (3.57 mm compared with 2.89 mm; p = 0.04). More cups in Group 2 had a cement mantle thickness less than 3 mm (30 % in Group 1 compared with 70 % in Group 2; p = 0.0039). No other radiological differences were observed. These results favor the use of a rim cutter device and flanged cup to improve the cement mantle for the acetabular components of cemented Exeter THAs. However, the improvements were less than expected. In view of the results of previous studies, further research is therefore needed to assess the value of this approach in improving the acetabular cement mantle.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ørskov M, Abdulghani S, McCarthy I, Søballe K, Flivik G (2010) Comparison of flanged and unflanged acetabular cup design. An experimental study using ceramic and cadaveric acetabuli. Acta Orthop 81:556–562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ørskov M, Abdulghani S, McCarthy I, Søballe K, Flivik G (2010) Comparison of flanged and unflanged acetabular cup design. An experimental study using ceramic and cadaveric acetabuli. Acta Orthop 81:556–562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
go back to reference Parsch D, Diehm C, Schneider S, New A, Breusch SJ (2004) Acetabular cementing technique in THA—flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments. Acta Orthop Scand 75:269–275CrossRefPubMed Parsch D, Diehm C, Schneider S, New A, Breusch SJ (2004) Acetabular cementing technique in THA—flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments. Acta Orthop Scand 75:269–275CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Shelley P, Wroblewski BM (1998) Socket design and cement pressurisation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 70:358–363 Shelley P, Wroblewski BM (1998) Socket design and cement pressurisation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 70:358–363
5.
go back to reference Conroy JL, Chawda M, Kaushal R, Whitehouse SL, Crawford RW, English H (2009) Does use of a “rim cutter” improve quality of cementation of the acetabular component of cemented exeter total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 24:71–76CrossRefPubMed Conroy JL, Chawda M, Kaushal R, Whitehouse SL, Crawford RW, English H (2009) Does use of a “rim cutter” improve quality of cementation of the acetabular component of cemented exeter total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 24:71–76CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Darmanis SN, Hubble MJW, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ (2012) Benefits of using modern cementing techniques in the acetabulum: the Rim Cutter. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20:316–321CrossRef Darmanis SN, Hubble MJW, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ (2012) Benefits of using modern cementing techniques in the acetabulum: the Rim Cutter. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20:316–321CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19PubMed Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19PubMed
8.
go back to reference Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Oh I, Merckx DB, Harris WH (1983) Acetabular cement compactor. An experimental study of pressurization of cement in the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177:289–293 Oh I, Merckx DB, Harris WH (1983) Acetabular cement compactor. An experimental study of pressurization of cement in the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177:289–293
10.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Kabo JM, Stoller DW, Zager SA, Amstutz HC (1984) Flow characteristics of acrylic bone cements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183:246–254 Markolf KL, Kabo JM, Stoller DW, Zager SA, Amstutz HC (1984) Flow characteristics of acrylic bone cements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183:246–254
11.
go back to reference Sierra RJ, Timperley JA, Gie GA (2009) Contemporary cementing technique and mortality during and after exeter total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:325–332CrossRefPubMed Sierra RJ, Timperley JA, Gie GA (2009) Contemporary cementing technique and mortality during and after exeter total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:325–332CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The use of a “rim cutter” device and a flanged cup for improving the mantle of the acetabular component of a cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasty
Authors
Jenaro Ángel Fernández-Valencia
Xavier Gallart
Guillem Bori
Juan Miguel Rodríguez-Roiz
Andreu Combalia
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1838-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2016 Go to the issue

General Review • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY

Management of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries