Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting

Authors: Kate Sawford, Navneet K Dhand, Jenny-Ann LML Toribio, Melanie R Taylor

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

After the 2011 cluster of Hendra virus cases in horses in Australia, public health targeted education initiatives at people in the equine industry to reduce human exposure to potentially infected horses. ‘Horse owners and Hendra Virus: A Longitudinal cohort study To Evaluate Risk’ aims to enhance public health measures through improved understanding of Hendra virus risk perception and risk mitigation strategies among horse owners and horse care providers. This paper describes the stakeholder consultation that was undertaken to ensure the cohort study outcomes were relevant to diverse groups who play a role in Hendra virus policy development and implementation.

Methods

A two-round modified Delphi study with online questionnaires was conducted. In round one, stakeholders identified priority research areas. In round two, stakeholders rated and ranked topics that emerged from thematic analysis of the round one responses. Round two data were analysed using logistic regression.

Results

Of the 255 stakeholders contacted, 101 responded to round one. Over 450 topics were proposed. These were organized into 18 themes. Approximately two thirds of the round one respondents participated in round two. ‘Hendra virus-related risk awareness and perception’, ‘personal health and safety’, ‘emergency preparedness’, ‘risk prevention, mitigation, and biosecurity’, and ‘Hendra virus vaccination in horses – attitudes/uptake’ were the top five areas identified according to probability of being ranked extremely important.

Conclusions

In this study, a modified Delphi approach was effective in guiding research into Hendra virus, a zoonotic disease of animal and human health significance. The findings support the notion that stakeholders should be engaged in zoonotic disease research priority setting. Such consultation will help to ensure that research initiatives are relevant and useful to stakeholders in the position to make use of new findings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Selvey LA, Wells RM, McCormack JG, Ansford AJ, Murray K, Rogers RJ, Lavercombe PS, Selleck P, Sheridan JW: Infection of humans and horses by a newly described morbillivirus. Med J Aust. 1995, 162: 642-645.PubMed Selvey LA, Wells RM, McCormack JG, Ansford AJ, Murray K, Rogers RJ, Lavercombe PS, Selleck P, Sheridan JW: Infection of humans and horses by a newly described morbillivirus. Med J Aust. 1995, 162: 642-645.PubMed
2.
go back to reference McFarlane R, Becker N, Field H: Investigation of the climatic and environmental context of Hendra virus spillover events 1994–2010. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e28374-10.1371/journal.pone.0028374.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McFarlane R, Becker N, Field H: Investigation of the climatic and environmental context of Hendra virus spillover events 1994–2010. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e28374-10.1371/journal.pone.0028374.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Field H, Crameri G, Kung NY, Wang LF: Ecological aspects of Hendra virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2012, 359: 11-23.PubMed Field H, Crameri G, Kung NY, Wang LF: Ecological aspects of Hendra virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2012, 359: 11-23.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mahalingam S, Herrero LJ, Playford EG, Spann K, Herring B, Rolph MS, Middleton D, McCall B, Field H, Wang LF: Hendra virus: an emerging paramyxovirus in Australia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012, 12: 799-807. 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70158-5.CrossRefPubMed Mahalingam S, Herrero LJ, Playford EG, Spann K, Herring B, Rolph MS, Middleton D, McCall B, Field H, Wang LF: Hendra virus: an emerging paramyxovirus in Australia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012, 12: 799-807. 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70158-5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Okoli C, Pawlowski SD: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manage. 2004, 42: 15-29. 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.CrossRef Okoli C, Pawlowski SD: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manage. 2004, 42: 15-29. 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Saldana J: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2012, London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Saldana J: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2012, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
7.
go back to reference Graneheim UH, Lundman B: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004, 24: 105-112. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.CrossRefPubMed Graneheim UH, Lundman B: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004, 24: 105-112. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Source. 2008, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Source. 2008, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
9.
go back to reference Firth D: Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993, 80: 27-38. 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27.CrossRef Firth D: Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993, 80: 27-38. 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heinze G, Schemper M: A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 2409-2419. 10.1002/sim.1047.CrossRefPubMed Heinze G, Schemper M: A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 2409-2419. 10.1002/sim.1047.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Owens C, Ley A, Aitken P: Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expect. 2008, 11: 418-431. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00492.x.CrossRefPubMed Owens C, Ley A, Aitken P: Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expect. 2008, 11: 418-431. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00492.x.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hsu C-C, Sandford BA: The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007, 12: 1-8. Hsu C-C, Sandford BA: The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007, 12: 1-8.
13.
go back to reference Betts P, Lound C: The Application of Alternative Modes of Data Collection on UK Government Social Surveys: Literature Review and Consultation with National Statistical Institutes. 2010, London: Office for National Statistics Betts P, Lound C: The Application of Alternative Modes of Data Collection on UK Government Social Surveys: Literature Review and Consultation with National Statistical Institutes. 2010, London: Office for National Statistics
Metadata
Title
The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
Authors
Kate Sawford
Navneet K Dhand
Jenny-Ann LML Toribio
Melanie R Taylor
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-182

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Public Health 1/2014 Go to the issue