Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

The Third French Alzheimer Plan: analysis of the influence of a national public health initiative on scientific research productivity and impact

Authors: Nicole Haeffner-Cavaillon, Patrick Devos, Sylvie Ledoux, Joël Ménard

Published in: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The Third National Alzheimer Plan (2008–2012) was a major public health initiative in France that included €200 million of funding for research in Alzheimer disease and related disorders (AD). The aim of this study was to document trends in French academic output in AD following the implementation of the plan.

Methods

Academic output (i.e., number of original articles) and scientific impact (i.e., article citations) of French research in AD were obtained from the Web of Knowledge core collection database. Analyses compared the 5-year period immediately before (2004–2008) and after (2009–2013) initiation of the plan. Comparisons were made with stroke, Parkinson disease, AIDS, and diabetes in the 14 leading countries worldwide and regionally within France.

Results

Worldwide production of original scientific articles between the periods 2004–2008 and 2009–2013 increased by 39 %, and that for AD increased by 46 %. China showed the largest increase and Japan the smallest. The absolute increase in French output on AD (54.6 %) was larger than that for stroke, Parkinson disease, AIDS, or diabetes. Globally, France had the third largest relative increase in output in AD (1.7-fold), behind only India (2.5-fold) and China (1.9-fold). There was a relative 2.3-fold increase in the proportion of French AD articles in the top 1 % globally most cited, larger than that for French articles on stroke, Parkinson disease, AIDS, or diabetes. At the national level, university hospitals participated in nearly 50 % of French AD publications. Analyses by geographical area demonstrated marked heterogeneity. We observed a strong correlation between level of funding and volume of output (R 2 = 0.70), but not between funding and article impact (proportion of top 10 % globally cited articles; correlation R 2 = 0.03).

Conclusions

Our study provides evidence of a specific positive impact of the funding provided by the Third National Alzheimer Plan in nearly doubling the global academic scientific output and increasing by 2.3-fold the top 1 % globally cited articles of France in AD research. Our bibliometric analyses provide objective and transparent information for policy makers on the relationship between research funding and academic output.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spinney L. Alzheimer’s disease funding and the French health system. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:26–7.CrossRefPubMed Spinney L. Alzheimer’s disease funding and the French health system. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:26–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Leydesdorff L. Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers. Scientometrics. 2012;92:355–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Leydesdorff L. Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers. Scientometrics. 2012;92:355–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rouvillain JL, Derancourt C, Moore N, Devos P. Scoring of medical publications with SIGAPS software: application to orthopedics. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100:821–5.CrossRefPubMed Rouvillain JL, Derancourt C, Moore N, Devos P. Scoring of medical publications with SIGAPS software: application to orthopedics. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100:821–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
6.
go back to reference Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: a comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. J Informetr. 2013;7:286–91.CrossRef Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: a comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. J Informetr. 2013;7:286–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lebrun L, Rusterholtz T, Fery-Lemonnier E, Woimant F, Leroyer J, Hommel M. Improving stroke care: a French health-care organiser’s perspective. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:123–4.CrossRefPubMed Lebrun L, Rusterholtz T, Fery-Lemonnier E, Woimant F, Leroyer J, Hommel M. Improving stroke care: a French health-care organiser’s perspective. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:123–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Third French Alzheimer Plan: analysis of the influence of a national public health initiative on scientific research productivity and impact
Authors
Nicole Haeffner-Cavaillon
Patrick Devos
Sylvie Ledoux
Joël Ménard
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1758-9193
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0144-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 1/2015 Go to the issue