Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Editorial

The ten wishes and hopes of the deputy editors of Intensive Care Medicine

Authors: Giuseppe Citerio, Anders Perner, Jean-Francois Timsit

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

The number of submissions to Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) has increased continually to the point where we now reject more than 80 % of the manuscripts submitted. The ICM editors do their best to select for publication those articles that are the absolute best because they:
1.
Have a clinical message that changes the practice of ICU clinicians caring for patients at the bedside,
 
2.
Add significantly to existing knowledge,
 
3.
Are properly registered and comply fully with the relevant regulations,
 
4.
Have a study design and methodology that enable authors to draw valid conclusions (i.e. minimal or no risk of bias).
 
Literature
4.
go back to reference Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S (2016) Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med 42:1164–1167. doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4357-9 CrossRefPubMed Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S (2016) Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med 42:1164–1167. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-016-4357-9 CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Eskesen TG, Wetterslev M, Perner A (2016) Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 42:324–332. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-4168-4 CrossRefPubMed Eskesen TG, Wetterslev M, Perner A (2016) Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 42:324–332. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-015-4168-4 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Angus DC, Barnato AE, Bell D et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators. Intensive Care Med 41:1549–1560. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3822-1 CrossRefPubMed Angus DC, Barnato AE, Bell D et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators. Intensive Care Med 41:1549–1560. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-015-3822-1 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rhodes A, Phillips G, Beale R et al (2015) The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study). Intensive Care Med 41:1620–1628. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3906-y CrossRefPubMed Rhodes A, Phillips G, Beale R et al (2015) The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study). Intensive Care Med 41:1620–1628. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-015-3906-y CrossRefPubMed
10.
Metadata
Title
The ten wishes and hopes of the deputy editors of Intensive Care Medicine
Authors
Giuseppe Citerio
Anders Perner
Jean-Francois Timsit
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4478-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Intensive Care Medicine 9/2016 Go to the issue