Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Study protocol

The Symptom Monitoring with Feedback Trial (SWIFT): protocol for a registry-based cluster randomised controlled trial in haemodialysis

Authors: Lavern Greenham, Paul N. Bennett, Kathryn Dansie, Andrea K. Viecelli, Shilpanjali Jesudason, Rebecca Mister, Brendan Smyth, Portia Westall, Samuel Herzog, Chris Brown, William Handke, Suetonia C. Palmer, Fergus J. Caskey, Cecile Couchoud, John Simes, Stephen P. McDonald, Rachael L. Morton

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Kidney failure prevalence is increasing worldwide. Haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or kidney transplantation are undertaken to extend life with kidney failure. People receiving haemodialysis commonly experience fatigue, pain, nausea, cramping, itching, sleeping difficulties, anxiety and depression. This symptom burden contributes to poor health-related quality of life (QOL) and is a major reason for treatment withdrawal and death. The Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) will test the hypothesis that regular symptom monitoring with feedback to people receiving haemodialysis and their treating clinical team can improve QOL.

Methods

We are conducting an Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry-based cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical- and cost-effectiveness at 12 months, of 3-monthly symptom monitoring using the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale-Renal (IPOS-Renal) survey with clinician feedback, compared with usual care among adults treated with haemodialysis. Participants complete symptom scoring using a tablet, which are provided to participants and to clinicians. The trial aims to recruit 143 satellite haemodialysis centres, (up to 2400 participants). The primary outcome is change in health-related QOL, as measured by EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, symptom severity (including haemodialysis-associated fatigue), healthcare utilisation and cost-effectiveness.

Discussion

SWIFT is the first registry-based trial in the Australian haemodialysis population to investigate whether regular symptom monitoring with feedback to participants and clinicians improves QOL. SWIFT is embedded in the ANZDATA Registry facilitating pragmatic recruitment from public and private dialysis clinics, throughout Australia. SWIFT will inform future collection, storage and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) within a clinical quality registry. As the first trial to rigorously estimate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of routine PROMs collection and reporting in haemodialysis units, SWIFT will provide invaluable information to health services, clinicians and researchers working to improve the lives of those with kidney failure.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001061​921. Registered on 16 October 2020
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agarwal A, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges. Med J Aust. 2022;216(1):9–11.CrossRef Agarwal A, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges. Med J Aust. 2022;216(1):9–11.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jager KJ, et al. A single number for advocacy and communication-worldwide more than 850 million individuals have kidney diseases. Kidney Int. 2019;96(5):1048–50.CrossRef Jager KJ, et al. A single number for advocacy and communication-worldwide more than 850 million individuals have kidney diseases. Kidney Int. 2019;96(5):1048–50.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Liyanage T, et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1975–82.CrossRef Liyanage T, et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1975–82.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cox KJ, et al. Symptoms among patients receiving in-center hemodialysis: a qualitative study. Hemodial Int. 2017;21(4):524–33.CrossRef Cox KJ, et al. Symptoms among patients receiving in-center hemodialysis: a qualitative study. Hemodial Int. 2017;21(4):524–33.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wyld M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001307.CrossRef Wyld M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001307.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Smyth B, et al. Varying association of extended hours dialysis with quality of life. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(12):1751–62.CrossRef Smyth B, et al. Varying association of extended hours dialysis with quality of life. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(12):1751–62.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Basch E, et al. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA. 2017;318(2):197–8.CrossRef Basch E, et al. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA. 2017;318(2):197–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Temel JS, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):733–42.CrossRef Temel JS, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):733–42.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Davison SN, et al. Executive summary of the KDIGO Controversies Conference on Supportive Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: developing a roadmap to improving quality care. Kidney Int. 2015;88(3):447–59.CrossRef Davison SN, et al. Executive summary of the KDIGO Controversies Conference on Supportive Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: developing a roadmap to improving quality care. Kidney Int. 2015;88(3):447–59.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Duncanson E, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e039014.CrossRef Duncanson E, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e039014.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chan AW, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.CrossRef Chan AW, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Husereau D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(2):117–22.CrossRef Husereau D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(2):117–22.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bennett PN. Satellite dialysis nursing: technology, caring and power. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(1):149–57.CrossRef Bennett PN. Satellite dialysis nursing: technology, caring and power. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(1):149–57.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Morton RL, et al. Use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in renal units in Australia and New Zealand: a cross-sectional survey study. Nephrology. 2020;25(1):14–21.CrossRef Morton RL, et al. Use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in renal units in Australia and New Zealand: a cross-sectional survey study. Nephrology. 2020;25(1):14–21.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Raj R, et al. Validation of the IPOS-Renal symptom survey in advanced kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56(2):281–7.CrossRef Raj R, et al. Validation of the IPOS-Renal symptom survey in advanced kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56(2):281–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brown MA, et al. ANZSN renal supportive care guidelines 2013. Nephrology. 2013;18(6):401–54.CrossRef Brown MA, et al. ANZSN renal supportive care guidelines 2013. Nephrology. 2013;18(6):401–54.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jesudason S, et al. SUN-095 patient reported outcome measures over the first three months of dialysis: interim results from the Multidisciplinary Assessment at Dialysis Entry (MADE) study. Kidney Int Rep. 2019;4(7):S195–6. Jesudason S, et al. SUN-095 patient reported outcome measures over the first three months of dialysis: interim results from the Multidisciplinary Assessment at Dialysis Entry (MADE) study. Kidney Int Rep. 2019;4(7):S195–6.
27.
go back to reference Ju A, et al. Validation of a core patient-reported outcome measure for fatigue in patients receiving hemodialysis: the SONG-HD fatigue instrument. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(11):1614–21.CrossRef Ju A, et al. Validation of a core patient-reported outcome measure for fatigue in patients receiving hemodialysis: the SONG-HD fatigue instrument. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(11):1614–21.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tong A, et al. Establishing core outcome domains in hemodialysis: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) consensus workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(1):97–107.CrossRef Tong A, et al. Establishing core outcome domains in hemodialysis: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) consensus workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(1):97–107.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wang S. WTP threshold may influence ICERs for regulatory decisions. PharmacoEconomics Outcomes News. 2018;800:33–7.CrossRef Wang S. WTP threshold may influence ICERs for regulatory decisions. PharmacoEconomics Outcomes News. 2018;800:33–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997;6(4):327–40.CrossRef Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997;6(4):327–40.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Janssen D, et al. Daily symptom burden in end-stage chronic organ failure: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2008;22(8):938–48.CrossRef Janssen D, et al. Daily symptom burden in end-stage chronic organ failure: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2008;22(8):938–48.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference van der Veer SN, Couchoud C, Morton RL. The role of kidney registries in expediting large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures for people with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(6):1495–503.CrossRef van der Veer SN, Couchoud C, Morton RL. The role of kidney registries in expediting large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures for people with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(6):1495–503.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Symptom Monitoring with Feedback Trial (SWIFT): protocol for a registry-based cluster randomised controlled trial in haemodialysis
Authors
Lavern Greenham
Paul N. Bennett
Kathryn Dansie
Andrea K. Viecelli
Shilpanjali Jesudason
Rebecca Mister
Brendan Smyth
Portia Westall
Samuel Herzog
Chris Brown
William Handke
Suetonia C. Palmer
Fergus J. Caskey
Cecile Couchoud
John Simes
Stephen P. McDonald
Rachael L. Morton
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06355-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue