Top

Systematic Reviews

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study

Authors: Karima Chaabna, Sohaila Cheema, Amit Abraham, Patrick Maisonneuve, Albert B. Lowenfels, Ravinder Mamtani

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Population health (PH) research capacity and performance are essential pillars of evidence-based practice to help address health inequalities. Best evidence is provided by systematic reviews (SRs). None of the published bibliometric analysis specifically assess the production of SRs on PH in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). The aim of our study is to investigate publication patterns and time trends of SRs reporting PH in the MENA region to evaluate the state of PH research performance in the region.

Method

The study protocol was developed a priori (protocol registration number: CRD42017076736). PubMed was searched. Two independent reviewers screened 5747 identified articles. We investigated author affiliation and collaboration, yearly citations of the SRs and journal information. Joinpoint regression was used to explore these characteristics overtime.

Results

Our meta-research included 387 SRs published between 2008 and 2016 which reported data on PH in 20 MENA countries. Publication of SRs increased over time in journals with impact factor < 4 and in the categories of yearly number of citations < 50 (p values ≤ 0.0024). Authors belonging to the region published increasingly (p value = 0.0001) over time. Thirty percent of the SRs were from authors solely from the region, while an additional 30% were from the region collaborating with Western country authors. Of these collaborative reviews, 79% were led by authors from the region. However, collaboration in the region (with the exclusion of collaboration with Western country authors) was rare (0.8%). These authors from the region published more in open-access journals while authors from Western countries collaborating or not with authors from the region published more in hybrid or non-open-access journals (p value < 0.0001). Collaboration between authors from MENA and Western countries led to published SRs in journals with impact factor ≥ 10. Systematic reviews with global coverage were published more by authors from Western countries, while SRs with country-level coverage were published by authors from the region (p value < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The incremental trend of PH SR publications on MENA likely reflects the ongoing improvement in research performance in the region. Authors from the region appear to be taking a lead role in conducting and disseminating MENA PH research. Open-access journals are a major contributor in facilitating MENA research dissemination.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO registration number CRD42017076736

Available only for authorised users

Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016;21(4):125–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Nchinda TC. Research capacity strengthening in the South. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2002;54(11):1699–711.CrossRef

Badenhorst A, Mansoori P, Chan KY. Assessing global, regional, national and sub-national capacity for public health research: a bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science(TM) in 1996-2010. J Glob Health. 2016;6(1):010504.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

McGregor S, Henderson KJ, Kaldor JM. Capacity building in longitudinal HIV research. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(1):e18–9.PubMedCrossRef

Nafade V, Nash M, Huddart S, Pande T, Gebreselassie N, Lienhardt C, et al. A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007-2016. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199706.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Rezaee-Zavareh MS, Salamati P, Alavian SM. Iran's research needs to be more noticed - Authors' reply. Lancet. 2017;389(10068):504.PubMedCrossRef

Chaabna K, Cheema S, Abraham A, Alrouh H, Mamtani R, Sheikh JI. Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Chaabna K, Cheema S, Abraham A, Mamtani R. Strengthening literature search strategies for systematic reviews reporting population health in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study. J Evid Based Med. 2020;13(3):192–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12394.

Chaabane S, Chaabna K, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in the Middle East and North Africa: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9363.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Chaabna K, Cheema S, Abraham A, Alrouh H, Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, et al. Systematic overview of hepatitis C infection in the Middle East and North Africa. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(27):3038–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

11.

Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, et al. PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility. Syst Rev. 2013;2:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

12.

Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.

13.

Iftikhar PM, Ali F, Faisaluddin M, Khayyat A, De Gouvia De Sa M, Rao T. A bibliometric analysis of the top 30 most-cited articles in gestational diabetes mellitus literature (1946-2019). Cureus. 2019;11(2):e4131.PubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Kindig D, Stoddart G. What is population health? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(3):380–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

16.

National institutes of Health. PubMed.gov US National Library of Medcine Bethesda, USA2016 [Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.

17.

Masic I, Milinovic K. On-line biomedical databases-the best source for quick search of the scientific information in the biomedicine. Acta Inform Med. 2012;20(2):72–84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

18.

Elsevier. Embase: Elsevier; 2018 [Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/embase-biomedical-research.

19.

Elsevier. Scopus: Content Coverage Guide: Elsevier; 2017 [Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/0597-Scopus-Content-Coverage-Guide-US-LETTER-v4-HI-singles-no-ticks.pdf.

20.

Chaabna K, Kouyoumjian SP, Abu-Raddad LJ. Hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149966.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

21.

Chaabna K, Mohamoud YA, Chemaitelly H, Mumtaz GR, Abu-Raddad LJ. Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence and incidence in the Horn of Africa sub-region of the Middle East and North Africa. Syst Rev. 2014;3:146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Chemaitelly H, Chaabna K, Abu-Raddad LJ. The Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Virus in the Fertile Crescent: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135281.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

23.

Chaabna K, Alali W. Enteric Salmonella in humans and food in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e017399.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

24.

The World Bank. Data: Wold Bank Country and Lending Groups: The World Bank; 2017 [Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.

25.

World Health Organisation. Country groupings: subregional country groupings for the global assessment of disease burden: WHO; N.D. [Available from: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/global/ebdcountgroup/en/.

26.

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. UNAIDS Middle East & North Africa: UNAIDS; 2017 [Available from: http://www.unaidsmena.org/.

27.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation GBD Compare | Viz Hub: University of Washington; 2017 [Available from: http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/.

28.

Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1092–6.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Research Medecal Library. What is considered a good impact factor? Texas, US: The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center; 2017 [Available from: http://mdanderson.libanswers.com/faq/26159.

30.

Nonprofit Publisher: Science Direct; 2019 [Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/nonprofit-publisher.

31.

Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA. Health research improves healthcare: now we have the evidence and the chance to help the WHO spread such benefits globally. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

32.

Globalization of Science: Labfolder; 2019 [Available from: https://www.labfolder.com/blog/globalization-of-science/.

33.

Muldoon KA, Birungi J, Berry NS, Ngolobe MH, Mwesigwa R, Shannon K, et al. Supporting southern-led research: implications for North-South research partnerships. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(2):128–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

34.

de Graft Aikins A, Arhinful DK, Pitchforth E, Ogedegbe G, Allotey P, Agyemang C. Establishing and sustaining research partnerships in Africa: a case study of the UK-Africa Academic Partnership on Chronic Disease. Glob Health. 2012;8:29.CrossRef

35.

Reddy P, Desai R, Sifunda S, Chalkidou K, Hongoro C, Macharia W, et al. "You Travel Faster Alone, but Further Together": Learning from a cross country research collaboration from a British Council Newton Fund Grant. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(11):977–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

36.

Walsh A, Brugha R, Byrne E. "The way the country has been carved up by researchers": ethics and power in north-south public health research. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):204.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

37.

Crane JY. Unequal ‘Partners’. AIDS, Academia, and the Rise of Global Health. Behemoth. 2010;3(3):78–97.CrossRef

38.

Gautier L, Sieleunou I, Kalolo A. Deconstructing the notion of "global health research partnerships" across Northern and African contexts. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(Suppl 1):49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

39.

Van der Veken K, Belaid L, Delvaux T, De Brouwere V. Research capacity building through North-South-South networking: towards true partnership? An exploratory study of a network for scientific support in the field of sexual and reproductive health. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

40.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

42.

World Health Organization. WHO's work with countries. Cooperation among countries. 2018 [Available from: http://www.who.int/country-cooperation/what-who-does/inter-country/en/.

43.

Sheikh JI, Cheema S, Chaabna K, Lowenfels AB, Mamtani R. Capacity building in health care professions within the Gulf cooperation council countries: paving the way forward. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

44.

Barbour V, Chinnock P, Cohen B, Yamey G. The impact of open access upon public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(5):339.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

45.

Harris M, Macinko J, Jimenez G, Mullachery P. Measuring the bias against low-income country research: an Implicit Association Test. Glob Health. 2017;13(1):80.CrossRef

46.

Yousefi-Nooraie R, Shakiba B, Mortaz-Hejri S. Country development and manuscript selection bias: a review of published studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

47.

Tomkins A, Zhang M, Heavlin WD. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(48):12708–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM, Hong Y, Grant AO, Daniels SR, et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. Jama. 2006;295(14):1675–80.PubMedCrossRef

49.

The PLoS Medicine Editors. The impact factor game. PLoS Med. 2006;3(6):e291.PubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Ofori-Adjei D, Antes G, Tharyan P, Slade E, Tamber PS. Have online international medical journals made local journals obsolete? PLoS Med. 2006;3(8):e359.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

51.

Sabri A, Ahad QM. Open Access Journals, need of developing countries. Reader Comments. PLoS Med. 2006. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/comment?id=10.1371/annotation/e16e0819-c4a7-4d9a-b4a5-f6418228b263.

52.

Horton R. Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty. Lancet. 2003;361(9359):712–3.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Langer A, Diaz-Olavarrieta C, Berdichevsky K, Villar J. Why is research from developing countries underrepresented in international health literature, and what can be done about it? Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(10):802–3.PubMedPubMedCentral

54.

exchange GHD. Deaths and DALYs for 2016 2018 [Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool.

55.

exchange GHD. GBD Results Tool. Deaths for 2017 2019 [Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool.

56.

The World Bank. Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79) 2016 [Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.DIAB.ZS.

57.

World Health Organisation. Obesity and overweight fact sheet Geneva, Switzerland2016 [Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.

58.

Supreme Council of Health. WHO Qatar STEPWISE Report 2012 chronic disease risk factor surveillance Doha, Qatar; 2013.

59.

Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011-2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015(219):1–8.

60.

Marcovitch H. Editors, publishers, impact factors, and reprint income. PLoS Med. 2010;7(10):e1000355.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

61.

Thomson Reuters. White Paper Using Bibliometrics: a guide to evaluating research performance with citation data: Thomson Reuters; 2008 [Available from: http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf.

62.

Page MJ, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Tricco AC, et al. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(5):e1002028.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Title: The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study
Authors: Karima Chaabna
Sohaila Cheema
Amit Abraham
Patrick Maisonneuve
Albert B. Lowenfels
Ravinder Mamtani
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01552-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Systematic review registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Systematic review registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Adolescent alcohol consumption: protocol for a scoping review of screening and assessment tools used in Africa

Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review

Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) for analgesia in trauma: a systematic review protocol

Safety and efficacy of different antibiotic regimens in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of childhood psychological maltreatment on mental health outcomes in adulthood: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Using median survival in meta-analysis of experimental time-to-event data