Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2009

Open Access 01-05-2009 | Original Article

The stability of impacted morsellized bone grafts in a metal cage under dynamic loaded conditions: an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect

Authors: Pieter H. J. Bullens, Bart H. W. Schreuder, Maarten C. de Waal Malefijt, Rene P. H. Veth, Pieter Buma, Nico Verdonschot

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Reconstructions of segmental diaphyseal bone defects with massive allografts are related to complications like nonunion and fractures. A reconstruction of these defects with a cage filled with an impacted morsellized bone graft could be an alternative. The bone graft in these cages should ideally be loaded to prevent resorption. Loading of morsellized bone grafts however can cause instability. The goal of this study was to assess the stability of an impacted morsellized bone graft in a cage under dynamic loaded conditions in an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect. The second goal was to assess the influence of cage type, washing of the graft and bone-cage fit.

Materials and methods

Two different cage types were filled with impacted morsellized bone graft. The grafts were used washed and unwashed and in variable bone-cage fit conditions. We recorded the bone graft deformation in the cage under dynamic loaded conditions.

Results

Stability appeared to be not very sensitive to the cage type and whether the bone chips were washed or not. However, quality of the fit of the cage with the bone segment was an important parameter and should be optimized during surgery.

Conclusions

Morsellized impacted bone graft in a cage is stable in dynamic loaded conditions in an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect. We believe that this method of reconstruction is a promising alternative for the reconstruction of large diaphyseal bone defects and should be tested relative to its biological merits in animal experiments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arts CJJ, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Schreurs BW (2006) Larger bone graft size and washing of bone grafts prior to impaction enhances the initial stability of cemented cups. Acta Orthop Scan 77:227–233CrossRef Arts CJJ, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Schreurs BW (2006) Larger bone graft size and washing of bone grafts prior to impaction enhances the initial stability of cemented cups. Acta Orthop Scan 77:227–233CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bavadekar A, Cornu O, Godts B, Delloye C, Van Tomme J, Banse X (2001) Stiffness and compactness of morsellized grafts during impaction: an in vitro study with human femoral heads. Acta Orthop Scand 72:470–476PubMedCrossRef Bavadekar A, Cornu O, Godts B, Delloye C, Van Tomme J, Banse X (2001) Stiffness and compactness of morsellized grafts during impaction: an in vitro study with human femoral heads. Acta Orthop Scand 72:470–476PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Benevenia J, Zimmerman M, Keating J, Cyran F, Blacksin M, Parsons JR (2000) Mechanical environment affects allograft incorporation. J Biomed Mater Res 53:67–72PubMedCrossRef Benevenia J, Zimmerman M, Keating J, Cyran F, Blacksin M, Parsons JR (2000) Mechanical environment affects allograft incorporation. J Biomed Mater Res 53:67–72PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bolder SBT, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N, Unen JMJ, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ (2003) Particle size and method of impaction influence initial stability of cemented cups. Acta Orthop Scand 74:652–657PubMedCrossRef Bolder SBT, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N, Unen JMJ, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ (2003) Particle size and method of impaction influence initial stability of cemented cups. Acta Orthop Scand 74:652–657PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bolder SBT, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N, Veth RPH, Buma P (2004) Wire mesh allows more revascularization than a strut in impaction bone grafting: an animal study in goats. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:280–286PubMedCrossRef Bolder SBT, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N, Veth RPH, Buma P (2004) Wire mesh allows more revascularization than a strut in impaction bone grafting: an animal study in goats. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:280–286PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bonutti PM, Cremens MJ, Miller BG (1998) Formation of structural grafts from cancellous bone fragments. Am J Orthop 27:499–502PubMed Bonutti PM, Cremens MJ, Miller BG (1998) Formation of structural grafts from cancellous bone fragments. Am J Orthop 27:499–502PubMed
7.
go back to reference Brigman BE, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt M, Mankin H (2004) Allografts about the knee in Young patients with high-grade Sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:232–239PubMedCrossRef Brigman BE, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt M, Mankin H (2004) Allografts about the knee in Young patients with high-grade Sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:232–239PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cobos JA, Lindsey RW, Gugala Z (2000) The cylindrical titanium mesh cage for treatment of a long bone segmental defect. J Orthop Trauma 14:54–59PubMedCrossRef Cobos JA, Lindsey RW, Gugala Z (2000) The cylindrical titanium mesh cage for treatment of a long bone segmental defect. J Orthop Trauma 14:54–59PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Deijkers RLM, Bloem RM, Kroon HM, Lent JB, Brand R, Taminiau AH (2005) Epidiaphyseal versus other intercalary allografts for tumors of the lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:151–160PubMedCrossRef Deijkers RLM, Bloem RM, Kroon HM, Lent JB, Brand R, Taminiau AH (2005) Epidiaphyseal versus other intercalary allografts for tumors of the lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:151–160PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Donk S, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW (2002) Effect of load on the early incorporation of impacted morsellized allografts. Biomaterials 23:297–330PubMedCrossRef Donk S, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW (2002) Effect of load on the early incorporation of impacted morsellized allografts. Biomaterials 23:297–330PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dunlop D, Brewster N, Madabhushi SPG, Usmani AS, Pankaj P, Howie CR (2000) Factors influencing impacted bone grafts strength-to wash or not to wash? Br J Bone Joint Surg 82:S1–S78 Dunlop D, Brewster N, Madabhushi SPG, Usmani AS, Pankaj P, Howie CR (2000) Factors influencing impacted bone grafts strength-to wash or not to wash? Br J Bone Joint Surg 82:S1–S78
12.
go back to reference Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID (1997) Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 12:535–540PubMedCrossRef Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID (1997) Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 12:535–540PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Enneking WF, Mindell ER (1991) Observations on massive retrieved human allografts. J Bone Joint Surg 73-A:1123–1142 Enneking WF, Mindell ER (1991) Observations on massive retrieved human allografts. J Bone Joint Surg 73-A:1123–1142
14.
go back to reference Fosse L, Rønningen H, Benum P, Lydersen S, Sandven RB (2006) Factors affecting stiffness properties in impacted morsellized bone used in revision hip surgery: an experimental in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res A 78(2):423–431PubMed Fosse L, Rønningen H, Benum P, Lydersen S, Sandven RB (2006) Factors affecting stiffness properties in impacted morsellized bone used in revision hip surgery: an experimental in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res A 78(2):423–431PubMed
15.
go back to reference Friedlaender GE (1987) Bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 69A:786–789 Friedlaender GE (1987) Bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 69A:786–789
16.
go back to reference Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. Br J Bone Joint Surg 75:14–21 Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. Br J Bone Joint Surg 75:14–21
17.
go back to reference Goldberg VM, Stevenson S (1993) The biology of bone grafts. Semin Arthroplas 4:58–63 Goldberg VM, Stevenson S (1993) The biology of bone grafts. Semin Arthroplas 4:58–63
18.
go back to reference Lamerigts NMP, Buma P, Huiskes R, Schreurs W, Gardeniers J, Slooff TJ (2000) Incorporation of morsellized bone under controlled loading conditions. Biomaterials 21:741–747PubMedCrossRef Lamerigts NMP, Buma P, Huiskes R, Schreurs W, Gardeniers J, Slooff TJ (2000) Incorporation of morsellized bone under controlled loading conditions. Biomaterials 21:741–747PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Learmonth ID (2003) Impaction grafting of the acetabulum: a universal solution? Orthopedics 26:941–942PubMed Learmonth ID (2003) Impaction grafting of the acetabulum: a universal solution? Orthopedics 26:941–942PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lietman SA, Tomford W, Gebhardt MC, Springfield DS, Mankin HJ (2000) Complications of irradiated allografts in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 375:214–217PubMedCrossRef Lietman SA, Tomford W, Gebhardt MC, Springfield DS, Mankin HJ (2000) Complications of irradiated allografts in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 375:214–217PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ostermann PAW, Haase N, Rubberdt A, Wich M, Ekkernkamp A (2002) Management of a long segmental defect at the proximal meta-diaphyseal junction using a cylindrical titanium mesh cage. J Orthop Trauma 16:597–601PubMedCrossRef Ostermann PAW, Haase N, Rubberdt A, Wich M, Ekkernkamp A (2002) Management of a long segmental defect at the proximal meta-diaphyseal junction using a cylindrical titanium mesh cage. J Orthop Trauma 16:597–601PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schimmel JW, Buma P, Versleyen D, Huiskes R, Slooff TJ (1998) Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellized cancellous allograft in cemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:438–448PubMedCrossRef Schimmel JW, Buma P, Versleyen D, Huiskes R, Slooff TJ (1998) Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellized cancellous allograft in cemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:438–448PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schreurs BW, Bolder SBT, Gardeniers JWM, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP (2004) Acetabular revision with impacted morsellized cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15 to 20 year follow-up. Br J Bone Joint Surg 86:492–497 Schreurs BW, Bolder SBT, Gardeniers JWM, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP (2004) Acetabular revision with impacted morsellized cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15 to 20 year follow-up. Br J Bone Joint Surg 86:492–497
24.
go back to reference Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM (1996) Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop 323:66–74 Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM (1996) Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop 323:66–74
25.
go back to reference Togawa D, Bauer TW, Brantigan JW, Lowery GL (2001) Bone graft incorporation in radiographically successful human intervertebral body fusion cages. Spine 26:2744–2750PubMedCrossRef Togawa D, Bauer TW, Brantigan JW, Lowery GL (2001) Bone graft incorporation in radiographically successful human intervertebral body fusion cages. Spine 26:2744–2750PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Togawa D, Bauer TW, Lieberman IH, Lowery G, Takikawa S (2003) Histology of tissues within retrieved human titanium mesh cages. Spine 28:246–254PubMedCrossRef Togawa D, Bauer TW, Lieberman IH, Lowery G, Takikawa S (2003) Histology of tissues within retrieved human titanium mesh cages. Spine 28:246–254PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ullmark G (2000) Bigger size and defatting of bone chips will increase cup stability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:445–447PubMedCrossRef Ullmark G (2000) Bigger size and defatting of bone chips will increase cup stability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:445–447PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wang JS, Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2000) Load-bearing increases new bone formation in impacted and morsellized allografts. Clin Orthop 378:274–281PubMedCrossRef Wang JS, Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2000) Load-bearing increases new bone formation in impacted and morsellized allografts. Clin Orthop 378:274–281PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zehr RJ, Enneking WF (1996) Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322:207–223PubMedCrossRef Zehr RJ, Enneking WF (1996) Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322:207–223PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The stability of impacted morsellized bone grafts in a metal cage under dynamic loaded conditions: an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect
Authors
Pieter H. J. Bullens
Bart H. W. Schreuder
Maarten C. de Waal Malefijt
Rene P. H. Veth
Pieter Buma
Nico Verdonschot
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0821-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2009 Go to the issue