Top

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2007 | Research

The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study

Authors: Dénes Szũcs, Fruzsina Soltész, Éva Jármi, Valéria Csépe

Published in: Behavioral and Brain Functions | Issue 1/2007

Abstract

Background

In the numerical Stroop paradigm (NSP) participants decide whether a digit is numerically or physically larger than another simultaneously presented digit. This paradigm is frequently used to assess the automatic number processing abilities of children. Currently it is unclear whether an equally refined evaluation of numerical magnitude occurs in both controlled (the numerical comparison task of the NSP) and automatic (the physical comparison task of the NSP) numerical comparison in both children and adults. One of our objectives was to respond this question by measuring the speed of controlled and automatic magnitude processing in children and adults in the NSP. Another objective was to determine how the immature executive functions of children affect their cognitive functions relative to adults in numerical comparison.

Methods and results

The speed of numerical comparison was determined by monitoring the electro-encephalographic (EEG) numerical distance effect: The amplitude of EEG measures is modulated as a function of numerical distance between the to-be-compared digits. EEG numerical distance effects occurred between 140–320 ms after stimulus presentation in both controlled and automatic numerical comparison in all age groups. Executive functions were assessed by analyzing facilitation and interference effects on the latency of the P3b event-related potential component and the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Interference effects were more related to response than to stimulus processing in children as compared with adults. The LRP revealed that the difficulty to inhibit irrelevant response tendencies was a major factor behind interference in the numerical task in children.

Conclusion

The timing of the EEG distance effect suggests that a refined evaluation of numerical magnitude happened at a similar speed in each age group during both controlled and automatic magnitude processing. The larger response interference in children than in adults suggests that despite the similar behavioural profile of children and adults, partially different cognitive processes underlie their performance in the NSP. Further, behavioural effects in the NSP depend on interactions between comparison, facilitation/interference and response-related processes. Our data suggest that caution is needed when using the NSP to compare behavioural markers of the numerical processing skills of children and adults.

Available only for authorised users

Dehaene S: The number sense. 1997, New York: Oxford University Press

Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cohen L: Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21: 355-361. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01263-6.CrossRefPubMed

Dehaene S, Molko N, Cohen L, Wilson A: Arithmetic and the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004, 14: 218-224. 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008.CrossRefPubMed

Moyer RS, Landauer TK: The time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature. 1967, 215: 1519-1520. 10.1038/2151519a0.CrossRefPubMed

Hinrichs JV, Yurko DS, Hu JM: Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981, 7: 890-901. 10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.890.CrossRef

Pinel P, Dehaene S, Riviere D, LeBihan D: Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage. 2001, 14: 1013-1026. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0913.CrossRefPubMed

Pinel P, Piazza M, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S: Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron. 2004, 41: 983-93. 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00107-2.CrossRefPubMed

Kaufmann L, Koppelstaetter F, Delazer M, Siedentopf C, Rhomberg P, Golaszewski S, Felber S, Ischebeck A: Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2005, 25: 888-898. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.041.CrossRefPubMed

Kadosh RC, Henik A, Rubinsten O, Mohr H, Dori H, Ven V, Zorzi M, Hendler T, Goebel R, Linden DEJ: Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 2005, 43: 1238-1248. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.12.017.CrossRef

10.

Piazza M, Izard V, Pinel P, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S: Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron. 2004, 44: 547-555. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Dehaene S: The organization of brain activations in number comparison: Event-related potentials and the additive factors method. J Cogn Neurosci. 1996, 8: 47-68.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Temple E, Posner MI: Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 7836-7841. 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7836.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

13.

Szũcs D, Csépe V: Similarities and differences in the coding of numerical and alphabetical order using acoustic stimulation as revealed by event-related potentials in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2004, 360: 65-68. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.038.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Szũcs D, Csépe V: The parietal distance effect appears in both the congenitally blind and matched sighted controls in an acoustic number comparison task. Neurosci Lett. 2005, 384: 11-16. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.050.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Soltész F, Szũcs D, Dékány J, Márkus A, Csépe V: A combined event-related potential and neuropsychological investigation of developmental dyscalculia. Neurosci Lett. 2007, 417: 181-186. 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.067.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sekuler R, Mierkiewicz D: Children's judgments of numerical inequality. Child Dev. 1977, 48: 630-633. 10.2307/1128664.CrossRef

17.

Henik A, Tzelgov J: Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Mem Cognit. 1982, 10: 389-395.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Stroop JR: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935, 18: 643-662. 10.1037/h0054651.CrossRef

19.

Tzelgov J, Meyer J, Henik A: Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. J Exp Psychol. 1992, 18: 166-179.

20.

Rubinstein O, Henik A: Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: a study of developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychology. 2005, 19: 641-648. 10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.641.CrossRef

21.

Girelli L, Lucangeli D, Butterworth B: The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. J Exp Child Psychol. 2000, 76: 104-122. 10.1006/jecp.2000.2564.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Rubinstein O, Henik A, Berger A, Shahar-Shalev S: The development of internal representations of magnitude and their assiciation with Arabic numerals. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002, 81: 74-92. 10.1006/jecp.2001.2645.CrossRef

23.

Cohen-Kadosh R, Cohen-Kadosh K, Schuhmann T, Kaas A, Goebel R, Henik A, Sack AT: Virtual dyscalculia induced by parietal-lobe TMS impairs automatic magnitude processing. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 1-5. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.053.CrossRef

24.

Davidson MC, Amso D, Anderson LC, Diamond A: Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia. 2006, 44: 2037-2078. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

25.

Ansari D, Garcia N, Lucas E, Hamon K, Dhital B: Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults. Neuroreport. 2005, 16: 1769-1773. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000183905.23396.f1.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kaufmann L, Koppelstaetter F, Siedentopf C, Haala I, Haberlandt E, Zimerhackl L-B, Felber S, Ischebeck A: Neural correlates of the number-size interference task in children. Neuroreport. 2006, 17: 587-591. 10.1097/00001756-200604240-00007.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

27.

MacLeod CM: Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991, 109: 163-203. 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Duncan-Johnson CC, Koppel BS: The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science. 1981, 214: 938-940. 10.1126/science.7302571.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ilan AB, Polic J: P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999, 110: 367-373. 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00053-7.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E: Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science. 1977, 197: 792-5. 10.1126/science.887923.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Verleger R: On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology. 1997, 34: 131-56. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02125.x.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Coles MGH: Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology. 1989, 26: 251-269. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb01916.x.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Delorme A, Makeig S: EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004, 134: 9-21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Otten LJ, Sudevan P, Logan GD, Coles MGH: Magnitude versus parity in numerical judgements: Event-related brain potentials implicate response conflict as the source of interference. Acta Psychologica. 1996, 94: 21-40. 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00047-X.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Enghoff S, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ: Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science. 2002, 295: 690-694. 10.1126/science.1066168.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Rugg MD, Coles MGH: The ERP and cognitive psychology: conceptual issues. Electrophysiology of mind, event-related potentials and cognition. Edited by: Rugg MD, Coles MGH. 1995, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-39.

37.

Rivera SM, Reiss AL, Eckert MA, Menon V: Developmental changes in mental arithmetic: evidence for increased functional specialization in the left inferior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2005, 15: 1779-90. 10.1093/cercor/bhi055.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Brocki KC, Bohlin G: Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A dimensional and developmental study. Dev Neuropsychol. 2004, 26: 571-593. 10.1207/s15326942dn2602_3.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Dowsett SM, Livesey DJ: The development of inhibitory control in preschool children: effects of "executive skills" training. Dev Psychobiol. 2000, 36: 161-174. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(200003)36:2<161::AID-DEV7>3.0.CO;2-0.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Bunge SA, Dudukovic NM, Thomason ME, Vaidya CJ, Gabrieli JDE: Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: evidence from fMRI. Neuron. 2002, 33: 301-311. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00583-9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

41.

Durston S, Thomas KM, Yang Y, Ulug AM, Zimmerman RD, Casey BJ: A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Dev Sci. 2002, 5: F9-F16. 10.1111/1467-7687.00235.CrossRef

42.

Booth JR, Burman DD, Meyer JR, Lei Z, Trommer BL, Davenport ND, Li W, Parrish TB, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM: Neural development of selective attention and response inhibition. Neuroimage. 2003, 20: 737-751. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00404-X.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Adleman NE, Menon V, Blasey CM, White CD, Warsofsky I, Glover GH, Reiss AL: A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop color-word task. Neuroimage. 2002, 16: 61-75. 10.1006/nimg.2001.1046.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Schroeter MI, Zysset S, Wahl M, Cramon DY: Prefrontal activation due to Stroop interference increases during development – an event-related fNIRS study. Neuroimage. 2004, 23: 1317-1325. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.001.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Usher M, McClelland JL: The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev. 2001, 108: 550-592. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Usher M, Olami Z, McClelland JL: Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoff. J Math Psychol. 2002, 46: 704-715. 10.1006/jmps.2002.1420.CrossRef

47.

Espy KA, McDiarmid MD, Cwik MF, Stalets MM, Senn TE, Hamby A: The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematics skills in preschool children. Dev Neuropsychol. 2004, 26: 465-486. 10.1207/s15326942dn2601_6.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Swanson HL: Cognitive processes that underlie mathematical precociousness in young children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006, 93: 239-264. 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Kaufmann L, Nuerk HC: Interference effects in a numerical Stroop paradigm in 9- to 12-year-old children with ADHD-C. Child Neuropsychol. 2006, 12: 223-243. 10.1080/09297040500477483.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Dehaene S, Changeaux JP: Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model. J Cogn Neurosci. 1993, 5: 390-407.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Nieder A, Miller EK: Coding of cognitive magnitude. Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2003, 37: 149-157. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01144-3.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Nieder A, Friedman DJ, Miller EK: Representation of the quantity of the visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science. 2002, 297: 1708-1711. 10.1126/science.1072493.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Schwarz W, Ischebeck A: On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgements of numerals. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003, 29: 507-522. 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.507.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Piaget J: The child's conception of number. 1952, New York: Norton

Title: The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study
Authors: Dénes Szũcs
Fruzsina Soltész
Éva Jármi
Valéria Csépe
Publication date: 01-12-2007
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Behavioral and Brain Functions / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1744-9081
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-3-23

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study

Abstract

Background

Methods and results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods and results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

N170 ERPs could represent a logographic processing strategy in visual word recognition

The integration window for shape cues is a function of ambient illumination

Association of dopamine receptor polymorphisms with schizophrenia and antipsychotic response in a South Indian population

Implicit transitive inference and the human hippocampus: does intravenous midazolam function as a reversible hippocampal lesion?

Possible use of repeated cold stress for reducing fatigue in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a hypothesis

Transgenic mice expressing constitutive active MAPKAPK5 display gender-dependent differences in exploration and activity