Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Article

The signs, symptoms and help-seeking experiences of neutropenic sepsis patients before they reach hospital: a qualitative study

Authors: Rachel T. Clarke, Sarah Bird, Isona Kakuchi, Tim J. Littlewood, Victoria van Hamel Parsons

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Neutropenic sepsis (NS) is a medical emergency in which urgent treatment with antibiotics is known to improve outcomes, yet there are minimal data about what happens to patients with NS before they reach hospital. We aimed to examine the pre-hospital experiences of patients with NS, identifying its early presenting features and exploring the factors potentially delaying patients’ arrival at hospital.

Methods

We conducted in-depth, qualitative interviews with 22 cancer patients admitted to hospital for treatment of NS and 10 patient carers. The setting was a tertiary referral centre in Southern England.

Results

Thirty seven percent of patients took over 12 h to present to hospital after symptom onset. The mean delay in presentation was 11 h (range 0–68 h).
Thematic analysis of the interviews, using grounded theory, revealed wide-ranging, potentially modifiable factors delaying patients’ presentation to hospital. For example, information provided to patients about NS from different sources was inconsistent, with ‘mixed messages’ about urgency triggering delays. All patients self-monitored their temperature and understood the implication of a fever but few appreciated the potential significance of feeling unwell in the absence of fever. Attempts to obtain treatment were sometimes thwarted by nonspecialists’ failure to recognise possible neutropenia in a patient with apparently mild signs, and several patients with NS were discharged without treatment. Some patients denied their symptoms to themselves and others to avoid hospital admission; palliative patients seemed particularly prone to these attitudes, while their carers were keen to seek medical attention.

Conclusions

This investigation of patients’ and carers’ experiences of NS identifies numerous strategies for improving patient education, support and pre-hospital management, all of which may reduce pre-hospital delays and consequently decrease morbidity and mortality from NS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Herbst C, Naumann F, Kruse E et al (2009) Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD007107 Herbst C, Naumann F, Kruse E et al (2009) Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD007107
2.
go back to reference Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood K et al (2006) Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:1589–1596PubMedCrossRef Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood K et al (2006) Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:1589–1596PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith T, Khatcheressian J, Lyman G et al (2006) 2006 Update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205PubMedCrossRef Smith T, Khatcheressian J, Lyman G et al (2006) 2006 Update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dellinger R, Levy M, Carlet J et al (2008) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 36:296–327PubMedCrossRef Dellinger R, Levy M, Carlet J et al (2008) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 36:296–327PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gaieski D, Mikkelsen M, Band R et al (2010) Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department. Crit Care Med 38:1045–1053PubMedCrossRef Gaieski D, Mikkelsen M, Band R et al (2010) Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department. Crit Care Med 38:1045–1053PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference De Naurois J, Novitzky-Basso I, Gill M et al (2010) Management of febrile neutropenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 21:v252–v256PubMedCrossRef De Naurois J, Novitzky-Basso I, Gill M et al (2010) Management of febrile neutropenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 21:v252–v256PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Clarke R, Warnick J, Stretton K et al (2011) Improving the immediate management of neutropenic sepsis in the UK: lessons from a national audit. Br J Haematol 153:773–779PubMedCrossRef Clarke R, Warnick J, Stretton K et al (2011) Improving the immediate management of neutropenic sepsis in the UK: lessons from a national audit. Br J Haematol 153:773–779PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18:59–82CrossRef Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18:59–82CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Glaser B (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley Glaser B (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley
12.
go back to reference Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W (2008) Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 337:a567PubMedCrossRef Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W (2008) Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 337:a567PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Evans J, Ziebland S, McPherson A (2007) Minimizing delays in ovarian cancer diagnosis: an expansion of Andersen’s model of ‘total patient delay’. Fam Pract 24:48–55PubMedCrossRef Evans J, Ziebland S, McPherson A (2007) Minimizing delays in ovarian cancer diagnosis: an expansion of Andersen’s model of ‘total patient delay’. Fam Pract 24:48–55PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Simon A, Waller J, Robb K et al (2010) Patient delay in presentation of possible cancer symptoms: the contribution of knowledge and attitudes in a population sample from the United Kingdom. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:2272–2277PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Simon A, Waller J, Robb K et al (2010) Patient delay in presentation of possible cancer symptoms: the contribution of knowledge and attitudes in a population sample from the United Kingdom. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:2272–2277PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Smith L, Pope C, Botha J (2005) Patients’ help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet 366:825–831PubMedCrossRef Smith L, Pope C, Botha J (2005) Patients’ help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet 366:825–831PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bandura, A (986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Bandura, A (986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Metadata
Title
The signs, symptoms and help-seeking experiences of neutropenic sepsis patients before they reach hospital: a qualitative study
Authors
Rachel T. Clarke
Sarah Bird
Isona Kakuchi
Tim J. Littlewood
Victoria van Hamel Parsons
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2631-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine