Top

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Published in:

01-09-2010 | Clinical Research

The Role of Ultrasound in Clubfoot Treatment: Correlation with the Pirani Score and Assessment of the Ponseti Method

Authors: Khaled Loutfy El-Adwar, Dr Ch Orth, Hesham Taha Kotb, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2010

Abstract

Background

To evaluate neonates and infants with clubfoot, clinical and imaging modalities are required. Conventional radiography is of limited value because the studied bones are not fully ossified.

Questions/purposes

We attempted to (1) evaluate clinically and sonographically the reliability of the Ponseti method in correcting clubfeet; and (2) determine whether various ultrasound (US) variables correlated with each other and with the Pirani score before and after treatment.

Methods

We prospectively followed 17 infants (25 clubfeet) assessed using the Pirani score and US variables (medial malleolus navicular distance, navicular alignment in relation to the talar head, medial soft tissue thickness, talar length, and calcaneocuboid distance) and treated with the Ponseti method. The mean age of the patients at first casting was 30 days, and repeat assessment after treatment was performed at a mean age of 6.3 months. Patients were followed for a minimum of 0.75 months (mean, 14.1 months; range, 0.75–38 months).

Results

The Ponseti method corrected all feet. We found three clinical/US correlations. Before treatment, we observed a negative correlation between the clinical midfoot score and the sonographic medial malleolus navicular distance. After treatment we observed two negative correlations: one between the midfoot score and the sonographic talar length and the other between the hindfoot score and medial malleolus navicular distance. Four feet had recurrence of varus, two of which had an increased calcaneocuboid distance despite full restoration of navicular alignment in one foot.

Conclusions

US can play a role in clubfoot assessment and may alert the surgeon to feet that may be prone to recurrence.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prospective study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abdelgawad AA, Lehman WB, van Bosse HJ, Scher DM, Sala DA. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16:98–105.PubMed

Aplington JP, Riddle CD Jr. Avascular necrosis of the body of the talus after combined medial and lateral release of congenital clubfoot. South Med J. 1976;69:1037–1038.PubMed

Aurell Y, Aldercreutz C, Andriesse H, Jonsson K. Repeatability of sonographic measurements in clubfeet. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:622–627.CrossRefPubMed

Aurell Y, Andriesse H, Johansson A, Jonsson K. Ultrasound assessment of early clubfoot treatment: a comparison of the Ponseti method and a modified Copenhagen method. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:347–357.PubMed

Aurell Y, Johansson A, Hansson G, Jonsson K. Ultrasound anatomy in the neonatal clubfoot. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2509–2517.PubMed

Aurell Y, Johansson A, Hansson G, Wallender H, Jonsson K. Ultrasound anatomy in the normal neonatal and infant foot: an anatomic introduction to ultrasound assessment of foot deformities. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2306–2312.PubMed

Bensahel H, Dimeglio A, Souchet PH. Final evaluation of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:137–141.PubMed

Bor N, Coplan JA, Herzenberg JE. Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: minimum 5-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1263–1270.CrossRefPubMed

Cahuzac JP, Baunin C, Luu S, Estivalezes E, Sales de Gauzy J, Hobatho MC. Assessment of hindfoot deformity by three-dimensional MRI in infant club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:97–101.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Celebi L, Muratli HH, Aksahin E, Yagmurlu MF, Bicimoglu A. Bensahel et al; International Clubfoot Study Group. Evaluation of treated clubfoot: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15:34–36.PubMed

11.

Chami M, Daoud A, Maestro M, Lagrange AS, Geoffray A. Ultrasound contribution in the analysis of the newborn and infant normal and clubfoot: a preliminary study. Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26:298–302.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Changulani M, Garg NK, Rajagopal TS, Bass A, Nayagam SN, Sampath J, Bruce CE. Treatment of idiopathic club foot using the Ponseti method: initial experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1385–1387.PubMed

13.

Desai S, Aroojis A, Mehta R. Ultrasound evaluation of clubfoot correction during Ponseti treatment: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28:53–59.PubMed

14.

Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet PH, Mazeau PH, Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:129-136.PubMed

15.

Dyer PJ, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of clubfoot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1082–1084.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Flynn J, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two clubfoot-classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:323–327.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Gerlach DJ, Gurnett CA, Limpaphayom N, Alaee F, Zhang Z, Porter K, Kirchhofer M, Smyth MD, Dobbs MB. Early results of the Ponseti method for the treatment of clubfoot associated with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1350–1359.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Gigante C, Talenti E, Turra S. Sonographic assessment of clubfoot. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32:235–242.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Gupta A, Singh S, Patel P, Patel J, Varshney MK. Evaluation of the utility of the Ponseti method of correction of clubfoot deformity in a developing nation. Int Orthop. 2008;32:75–79.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hamel J, Becker W. Sonographic assessment of clubfoot deformity in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5:279–286.PubMed

21.

Hegazy M, Nasef NM, Abdel-Ghani H. Results of treatment of idiopathic clubfoot in older infants using the Ponseti method: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2009;18:76–78.PubMed

22.

Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N. Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic club foot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:517–521.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Howard CB, Benson MK. The ossific nuclei and the cartilage anlage of the talus and calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:620–623.PubMed

24.

Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:23–31.PubMed

25.

Lau JH, Meyer LC, Lau HC. Results of surgical treatment of talipes equinovarus congenita. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:219–226.PubMed

26.

Maiza D, Themar-Neol C, Legrand I, Bensahel H, Hassan M. Ultrasonographic approach to the neonatal foot: preliminary study. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:123–128.PubMed

27.

Napiontek M. Intraoperative ultrasound for evaluation of reduction in congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:55–57.PubMed

28.

Ponseti IV. Common errors in the treatment of congenital clubfoot. Int Orthop.1997; 21:137–141.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. Congenital club foot: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:261–275.

30.

Simons GW. A standardized method for the radiographic evaluation of clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;135:107–118.PubMed

31.

Staheli L, ed. Clubfoot: Ponseti Management. Ed 3. Seattle, WA: Global Help Organization. Available at: http://www.global-help.org/publications/books/help_cfponseti.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2010.

32.

Suda R, Suda AJ, Grill F. Sonographic classification of idiopathic clubfoot according to severity. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15:134–140.PubMed

33.

Tarraf YN, Carroll NC. Analysis of the components of residual deformity in clubfeet presenting for reoperation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12:207–216.PubMed

34.

Tolat V, Boothroyd A, Carty H, Klenerman L. Ultrasound: a helpful guide in the treatment of congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:65–70.PubMed

Title: The Role of Ultrasound in Clubfoot Treatment: Correlation with the Pirani Score and Assessment of the Ponseti Method
Authors: Khaled Loutfy El-Adwar, Dr Ch Orth
Hesham Taha Kotb, MD
Publication date: 01-09-2010
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1335-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The Role of Ultrasound in Clubfoot Treatment: Correlation with the Pirani Score and Assessment of the Ponseti Method

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Open Reduction as a Risk Factor for Substantial Osteonecrosis

Intramedullary Nailing as a ‘Second Hit’ Phenomenon in Experimental Research: Lessons Learned and Future Directions

Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties: A Spectrum of Clinical Presentations and Operative Findings

Nonadherence in Outpatient Thrombosis Prophylaxis with Low Molecular Weight Heparins after Major Orthopaedic Surgery

50 Years Ago in CORR: Complications in Replacement Arthroplasty of the Hip; Experience with 68 Additional Cases Howard Mendelsohn, MD and Bernard N. Becker, MD CORR 1955;6:48–53

Case Reports: Two Cases of Glenohumeral Chondrolysis after Intraarticular Pain Pumps