Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The role of primary care providers in patient activation and engagement in self-management: a cross-sectional analysis

Authors: Carmen Alvarez, Jessica Greene, Judith Hibbard, Valerie Overton

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The increasing burden of chronic illness highlights the importance of self-care and shifts from hierarchical and patriarchal models to partnerships. Primary care providers (PCPs) play an important role in supporting patients in self-management, enabling activation and supporting chronic care. We explored the extent to which PCPs’ beliefs about the importance of the patients’ role relate to the frequency in which they report engaging in collaborative and partnership-building behaviors with patients.

Methods

PCPs’ beliefs were measured using the Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS-PAM). We also assessed whether PCPs’ CS-PAM scores were positively associated with changes in their patients’ Patient Activation Measure (PAM) scores. Participants included 181 PCPs from a single accountable care organization in Minnesota who completed an online survey. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate regression models to examine relationships between CS-PAM and PCP self-management support behaviors and changes in level of patient activation.

Results

PCPs with high CS-PAM scores were much more likely to engage in supportive self-management and patient behavior change approaches, such as involving the patient in agenda-setting, problem-solving, and collaboratively setting behavioral goals, than were PCPs with low CS-PAM scores. More positive PCPs’ belief in the patients’ role in self-management was positively correlated with improvements in their patients’ level of patient activation.

Conclusions

More positive PCP beliefs about the patients’ role in self-management was strongly related to PCP behaviors geared towards increasing patient activation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Bennett SM, Austin BT, Greene SM, Schaefer JK, Vonkorff M. Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11(1):s-7–s-15.CrossRef Wagner EH, Bennett SM, Austin BT, Greene SM, Schaefer JK, Vonkorff M. Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11(1):s-7–s-15.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Damberg CL, Sorbero ME, Lovejoy SL, Martsolf GR, Raaen L, Mandel D. Measuring success in health care value-based purchasing programs. 2014. Damberg CL, Sorbero ME, Lovejoy SL, Martsolf GR, Raaen L, Mandel D. Measuring success in health care value-based purchasing programs. 2014.
3.
go back to reference Epstein AM. Promoting delivery system integration to foster higher value care: slow progress ahead. JAMA. 2013;173(15):1456–7. Epstein AM. Promoting delivery system integration to foster higher value care: slow progress ahead. JAMA. 2013;173(15):1456–7.
4.
go back to reference Sommers BD, Bindman AB. New physicians, the affordable care Act, and the changing practice of medicine. JAMA. 2012;307(16):1697–8.CrossRefPubMed Sommers BD, Bindman AB. New physicians, the affordable care Act, and the changing practice of medicine. JAMA. 2012;307(16):1697–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ory MG, Ahn S, Jiang L, Smith ML, Ritter PL, Whitelaw N, et al. Successes of a national study of the chronic disease self-management program: meeting the triple aim of health care reform. Med Care. 2013;51(11):992–8.CrossRefPubMed Ory MG, Ahn S, Jiang L, Smith ML, Ritter PL, Whitelaw N, et al. Successes of a national study of the chronic disease self-management program: meeting the triple aim of health care reform. Med Care. 2013;51(11):992–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Collins PA, Mahoney E, Baker LH. The development and testing of a measure assessing clinician beliefs about patient self management. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):65–72.CrossRefPubMed Hibbard JH, Collins PA, Mahoney E, Baker LH. The development and testing of a measure assessing clinician beliefs about patient self management. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):65–72.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference England N. How much do clinicians support patient activaton? 2015. England N. How much do clinicians support patient activaton? 2015.
8.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, King DK. Use of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) with diabetic patients relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2655–61.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, King DK. Use of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) with diabetic patients relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2655–61.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Greene J, Yedidia MJ. Provider behaviors contributing to patient self-management of chronic illness among underserved populations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005;16(4):808–24.CrossRefPubMed Greene J, Yedidia MJ. Provider behaviors contributing to patient self-management of chronic illness among underserved populations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005;16(4):808–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schmittdiel J, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE, Hibbard J, Remmers C, Bellows J. Patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(1):77–80.CrossRefPubMed Schmittdiel J, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE, Hibbard J, Remmers C, Bellows J. Patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(1):77–80.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Blakeman T, Macdonald W, Bower P, Gately C, Chew-Graham C. A qualitative study of GPs’ attitudes to self-management of chronic disease. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(527):407–14.PubMedPubMedCentral Blakeman T, Macdonald W, Bower P, Gately C, Chew-Graham C. A qualitative study of GPs’ attitudes to self-management of chronic disease. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(527):407–14.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4p1):1005–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4p1):1005–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Greene J, Hibbard JH, Overton V. A case study of a team-based, quality-focused compensation model for primary care providers. Medical Care Research and Review 2013:1077558713506749 Greene J, Hibbard JH, Overton V. A case study of a team-based, quality-focused compensation model for primary care providers. Medical Care Research and Review 2013:1077558713506749
14.
go back to reference Smith R. Polytomous mean-square fit statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1996;10(3):516–7. Smith R. Polytomous mean-square fit statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1996;10(3):516–7.
15.
go back to reference Rademakers J, Jansen D, van der Hoek L, Heijmans M. Clinicians’ beliefs and attitudes toward patient self-management in the Netherlands; translation and testing of the american clinician support for patient activation measure (CS-PAM). BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rademakers J, Jansen D, van der Hoek L, Heijmans M. Clinicians’ beliefs and attitudes toward patient self-management in the Netherlands; translation and testing of the american clinician support for patient activation measure (CS-PAM). BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(5):520–6.CrossRefPubMed Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(5):520–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Greene J, Overton V. Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients ‘scores’. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):216–22.CrossRef Hibbard JH, Greene J, Overton V. Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients ‘scores’. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):216–22.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Greene J, Rogers VW, Yedidia MJ. The impact of implementing a chronic care residency training initiative on asthma outcomes. Acad Med. 2007;82(2):161–7.CrossRefPubMed Greene J, Rogers VW, Yedidia MJ. The impact of implementing a chronic care residency training initiative on asthma outcomes. Acad Med. 2007;82(2):161–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The role of primary care providers in patient activation and engagement in self-management: a cross-sectional analysis
Authors
Carmen Alvarez
Jessica Greene
Judith Hibbard
Valerie Overton
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1328-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue