Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Article

The relatives’ perspective on advanced cancer care in Denmark. A cross-sectional survey

Authors: Anna T. Johnsen, Lone Ross, Morten A. Petersen, Line Lund, Mogens Groenvold

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In order to improve advanced cancer care, evaluations are necessary. An important element of such evaluations is the perspective of the patient’s relatives who have the role of being caregivers as well as co-users of the health care system. The aims were to investigate the scale structure of the FAMCARE scale, to investigate satisfaction with advanced cancer care from the perspective of the relatives of a representative sample of advanced cancer patients, and to investigate whether some sub-groups of relatives were more dissatisfied than others.

Method

From 977 patients treated at 54 different Danish hospital departments, 569 patients provided us with the name and address of their relative. Of these, 544 received the FAMCARE scale that measures the families’ satisfaction with advanced cancer care. For the four FAMCARE sub-scales, internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha; convergent and discriminant validity was analyzed using multitrait-scaling analysis. Associations between the relatives’ dissatisfaction and clinical and sociodemographic variables were investigated in explorative analyses using multiple logistic regressions.

Results

Of the relatives receiving the questionnaire, 467 (86%) responded. The original scale structure of FAMCARE could not be supported in the present sample, and therefore, results are reported at singe-item level. The proportion of dissatisfied relatives ranged from 5% to 28% (median 13%). Highest levels of dissatisfaction were found for time taken to make a diagnosis (28%) and the speed with which symptoms were treated (25%). Younger relatives were more dissatisfied than older relatives. Other sociodemographic and clinical variables had little impact on the relatives’ levels of satisfaction.

Conclusion

The relatives’ level of dissatisfaction with some of the areas included in this survey needs to be taken seriously. Younger relatives were most dissatisfied.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lis CG, Rodeghier M, Grutsch JF, Gupta D (2009) Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology with a focus on health related quality of life. BMC Heal Serv Res 9:190CrossRef Lis CG, Rodeghier M, Grutsch JF, Gupta D (2009) Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology with a focus on health related quality of life. BMC Heal Serv Res 9:190CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C et al (2001) Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using patients’ satisfaction information. Oncology 61:120–128PubMedCrossRef Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C et al (2001) Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using patients’ satisfaction information. Oncology 61:120–128PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hall JA, Dornan MC (1990) Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 30:811–818PubMedCrossRef Hall JA, Dornan MC (1990) Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 30:811–818PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Carter GL, Lewin TJ, Gianacas L, Clover K, Adams C (2011) Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6. Support Care Cancer 19:565–572PubMedCrossRef Carter GL, Lewin TJ, Gianacas L, Clover K, Adams C (2011) Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6. Support Care Cancer 19:565–572PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shim EJ, Lee KS, Park JH, Park JH (2010) Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation. Support Care Cancer [Epub ahead of print] Shim EJ, Lee KS, Park JH, Park JH (2010) Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation. Support Care Cancer [Epub ahead of print]
6.
go back to reference Fagerstrom L (1998) The patient’s perceived caring needs as a message of suffering. J Adv Nurs 28:978–987PubMedCrossRef Fagerstrom L (1998) The patient’s perceived caring needs as a message of suffering. J Adv Nurs 28:978–987PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kristjanson LJ (1989) Quality of terminal care: salient indicators identified by families. J Palliat Care 5:21–30PubMed Kristjanson LJ (1989) Quality of terminal care: salient indicators identified by families. J Palliat Care 5:21–30PubMed
8.
go back to reference Andershed B (2006) Relatives in end-of-life care—part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years, January 1999-February 2004. J Clin Nurs 15:1158–1169PubMedCrossRef Andershed B (2006) Relatives in end-of-life care—part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years, January 1999-February 2004. J Clin Nurs 15:1158–1169PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Andershed B, Ternestedt BM (2001) Development of a theoretical framework describing relatives’ involvement in palliative care. J Adv Nurs 34:554–562PubMedCrossRef Andershed B, Ternestedt BM (2001) Development of a theoretical framework describing relatives’ involvement in palliative care. J Adv Nurs 34:554–562PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mok E, Chan F, Chan V, Yeung E (2003) Family experience caring for terminally ill patients with cancer in Hong Kong. Cancer Nursing 26:267–275PubMedCrossRef Mok E, Chan F, Chan V, Yeung E (2003) Family experience caring for terminally ill patients with cancer in Hong Kong. Cancer Nursing 26:267–275PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stajduhar KI, Martin W, Cairns M (2010) What makes grief difficult? Perspectives from bereaved family caregivers and healthcare providers of advanced cancer patients. Palliat Support Care 8:277–289PubMedCrossRef Stajduhar KI, Martin W, Cairns M (2010) What makes grief difficult? Perspectives from bereaved family caregivers and healthcare providers of advanced cancer patients. Palliat Support Care 8:277–289PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Higginson I, Wade A, McCarthy M (1990) Palliative care: views of patients and their families. BMJ 301:277–281PubMedCrossRef Higginson I, Wade A, McCarthy M (1990) Palliative care: views of patients and their families. BMJ 301:277–281PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Higginson I, Priest P, McCarthy M (1994) Are bereaved family members a valid proxy for a patient’s assessment of dying. Soc Sci Med 38:553–557PubMedCrossRef Higginson I, Priest P, McCarthy M (1994) Are bereaved family members a valid proxy for a patient’s assessment of dying. Soc Sci Med 38:553–557PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Milberg A, Strang P, Carlsson M, Börjesson S (2003) Advanced palliative home care: next-of-kin’s perspective. J Palliat Med 6:749–756PubMedCrossRef Milberg A, Strang P, Carlsson M, Börjesson S (2003) Advanced palliative home care: next-of-kin’s perspective. J Palliat Med 6:749–756PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kim Y, Given BA (2008) Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors: across the trajectory of the illness. Cancer 112:2556–2568PubMedCrossRef Kim Y, Given BA (2008) Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors: across the trajectory of the illness. Cancer 112:2556–2568PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ringdal GI, Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S (2002) Family satisfaction with end-of-life care for cancer patients in a cluster randomized trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 24:53–63PubMedCrossRef Ringdal GI, Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S (2002) Family satisfaction with end-of-life care for cancer patients in a cluster randomized trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 24:53–63PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rodriguez KL, Bayliss NK, Jaffe E, Zickmund S, Sevick MA (2010) Factor analysis and internal consistency evaluation of the FAMCARE scale for use in the long-term care setting. Palliat Support Care 8:169–176PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez KL, Bayliss NK, Jaffe E, Zickmund S, Sevick MA (2010) Factor analysis and internal consistency evaluation of the FAMCARE scale for use in the long-term care setting. Palliat Support Care 8:169–176PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gelfman LP, Meier DE, Morrison RS (2008) Does palliative care improve quality? A survey of bereaved family members. J Pain Symptom Manage 36:22–28PubMedCrossRef Gelfman LP, Meier DE, Morrison RS (2008) Does palliative care improve quality? A survey of bereaved family members. J Pain Symptom Manage 36:22–28PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Morita T, Chihara S, Kashiwagi T (2002) Family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care in Japan. Palliat Med 16:185–193PubMedCrossRef Morita T, Chihara S, Kashiwagi T (2002) Family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care in Japan. Palliat Med 16:185–193PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jarvis H, Burge FI, Scott CA (1996) Evaluating a palliative care program: methodology and limitations. J Palliat Care 12:23–33PubMed Jarvis H, Burge FI, Scott CA (1996) Evaluating a palliative care program: methodology and limitations. J Palliat Care 12:23–33PubMed
21.
go back to reference Finlay E, Shreve S, Casarett D (2008) Nationwide veterans affairs quality measure for cancer: the family assessment of treatment at end of life. J Clin Oncol 26:3838–3844PubMedCrossRef Finlay E, Shreve S, Casarett D (2008) Nationwide veterans affairs quality measure for cancer: the family assessment of treatment at end of life. J Clin Oncol 26:3838–3844PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Finkelstein BS, Singh J, Silvers JB, Neuhauser D, Rosenthal GE (1998) Patient and hospital characteristics associated with patient assessments of hospital obstetrical care. Medical Care 36:68–78CrossRef Finkelstein BS, Singh J, Silvers JB, Neuhauser D, Rosenthal GE (1998) Patient and hospital characteristics associated with patient assessments of hospital obstetrical care. Medical Care 36:68–78CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kristjanson LJ (1993) Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE scale: measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care. Soc Sci Med 36:693–701PubMedCrossRef Kristjanson LJ (1993) Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE scale: measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care. Soc Sci Med 36:693–701PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mayland CR, Williams EMI, Ellershaw JE (2008) How well do current instruments using bereaved relatives’ views evaluate care for dying patients? Palliat Med 22:133–144PubMedCrossRef Mayland CR, Williams EMI, Ellershaw JE (2008) How well do current instruments using bereaved relatives’ views evaluate care for dying patients? Palliat Med 22:133–144PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ringdal GI, Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S (2003) Measuring quality of palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE scale. Qual Life Res 12:167–176PubMedCrossRef Ringdal GI, Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S (2003) Measuring quality of palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE scale. Qual Life Res 12:167–176PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Johnsen AT, Petersen MA, Pedersen L, Groenvold M (2009) Symptoms and problems in a nationally representative sample of advanced cancer patients. Palliat Med 23:491–501PubMedCrossRef Johnsen AT, Petersen MA, Pedersen L, Groenvold M (2009) Symptoms and problems in a nationally representative sample of advanced cancer patients. Palliat Med 23:491–501PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference American joint committee on cancer (2002) AJCC—cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, Chicago American joint committee on cancer (2002) AJCC—cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, Chicago
28.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary
29.
go back to reference Fayers P, Machin D (2007). Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2.nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd Fayers P, Machin D (2007). Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2.nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
30.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829–1843PubMedCrossRef Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829–1843PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference McPherson CJ, Addington-Hall JM (2003) Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information? Soc Sci Med 56:95–109PubMedCrossRef McPherson CJ, Addington-Hall JM (2003) Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information? Soc Sci Med 56:95–109PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Baker R, Wu AW, Teno JM, Kreling B, Damiano A, Rubin H (2000) Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48 Baker R, Wu AW, Teno JM, Kreling B, Damiano A, Rubin H (2000) Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48
33.
go back to reference Fakhoury W, McCarthy M, Addington-Hall J (1996) Determinants of informal caregivers’ satisfaction with services for dying cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 42:721–731PubMedCrossRef Fakhoury W, McCarthy M, Addington-Hall J (1996) Determinants of informal caregivers’ satisfaction with services for dying cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 42:721–731PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Aoun S, Bird S, Kristjanson LJ, Currow D (2010) Reliability testing of the FAMCARE-2 scale: measuring family carer satisfaction with palliative care. Palliat Med 24:674–681PubMedCrossRef Aoun S, Bird S, Kristjanson LJ, Currow D (2010) Reliability testing of the FAMCARE-2 scale: measuring family carer satisfaction with palliative care. Palliat Med 24:674–681PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hwang SS, Chang VT, Alejandro Y et al (2003) Caregiver unmet needs, burden, and satisfaction in symptomatic advanced cancer patients at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Palliat Support Care 1:319–329PubMedCrossRef Hwang SS, Chang VT, Alejandro Y et al (2003) Caregiver unmet needs, burden, and satisfaction in symptomatic advanced cancer patients at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Palliat Support Care 1:319–329PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The relatives’ perspective on advanced cancer care in Denmark. A cross-sectional survey
Authors
Anna T. Johnsen
Lone Ross
Morten A. Petersen
Line Lund
Mogens Groenvold
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1454-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine