Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Original Contributions

The Relationship of Pre-Operative Health Status to Sustained Outcome in Gastric Bypass Surgery

Authors: Richard I. Lanyon, Barbara M. Maxwell, Rebecca E. Wershba

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The task of sustaining initial weight loss after gastric bypass surgery has been identified as the area of greatest concern in this intervention. The present study investigated the role of good vs. poor pre-operative health as a moderator variable in identifying useful pre-operative predictors of continued weight loss. Follow-up data at a mean of 12.8 months and again at 3.2 years post-operatively were available for 79 patients on 227 interview variables and four psychological assessment instruments. These measures were studied for their success in predicting continued weight loss over the 1–3-year period separately for patients who were in good and in poor general pre-operative health. Previous findings showed that the overall mean simple weight loss to 12.8 months was 45.61 kg, but additional weight loss to 3.2 years was only 0.28 kg. The good and poor pre-operative health groups differed little on these figures. However, the significant predictors of continued weight loss for good-health patients (high anxiety and distress, low self-esteem, poor eating habits, strong expectations of life improvement, and good achievement and coping skills) were quite different from those for poor-health patients (good psychological health and happiness, strong personal support and life satisfaction, good eating habits, and little knowledge about their health). Thus, pre-operative health status served as a powerful moderator in predicting continued weight loss from pre-operative characteristics. These findings offer a means of making more accurate predictions as to which patients are the best candidates for surgery, and also suggest that different psychological and other interventions should be selected according to pre-operative health status.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Powell LH, Calvin III JE, Calvin Jr JE. Effective obesity treatments. Am Psychol. 2007;62:234–46.PubMedCrossRef Powell LH, Calvin III JE, Calvin Jr JE. Effective obesity treatments. Am Psychol. 2007;62:234–46.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lanyon RI, Maxwell BM. Predictors of outcome after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17:321–8.PubMedCrossRef Lanyon RI, Maxwell BM. Predictors of outcome after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17:321–8.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lanyon RI, Maxwell BM, Kraft AJ. Prediction of long-term outcome after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2009;19:439–45.PubMedCrossRef Lanyon RI, Maxwell BM, Kraft AJ. Prediction of long-term outcome after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2009;19:439–45.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham J, et al. MMPI-2: manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1989. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham J, et al. MMPI-2: manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1989.
5.
go back to reference Jackson DN. Basic Personality Inventory: manual. Sigma Assessment Systems: Port Huron, MI; 1989. Jackson DN. Basic Personality Inventory: manual. Sigma Assessment Systems: Port Huron, MI; 1989.
6.
go back to reference Ruehlman LS, Lanyon RI, Karoly P. Multidimensional Health Profile: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL; 1998. Ruehlman LS, Lanyon RI, Karoly P. Multidimensional Health Profile: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL; 1998.
7.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders–IV–TR. Washington, DC: APA; 1964. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders–IV–TR. Washington, DC: APA; 1964.
8.
go back to reference McGrath RE, Mitchell M, Kim BH, et al. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychol Bull. 2010;136:450–70.PubMedCrossRef McGrath RE, Mitchell M, Kim BH, et al. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychol Bull. 2010;136:450–70.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Relationship of Pre-Operative Health Status to Sustained Outcome in Gastric Bypass Surgery
Authors
Richard I. Lanyon
Barbara M. Maxwell
Rebecca E. Wershba
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1085-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Obesity Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue