Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2018

01-11-2018

The relationship between the P wave and local atrial electrogram in predicting conduction block during catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter

Authors: Miki Yokokawa, Mohamad C. Sinno, Mohammed Saeed, Rakesh Latchamsetty, Hamid Ghanbari, Thomas Crawford, Krit Jongnarangsin, Ryan Cunnane, Frank Pelosi Jr, Frank Bogun, Aman Chugh, Fred Morady, Hakan Oral

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The endpoint for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) is complete conduction block along the CTI. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of the temporal relationship between the P wave and the local atrial electrograms in determining complete CTI block.

Methods

RFA of CTI was performed in 125 patients (age 63 ± 11 years). During pacing from the coronary sinus (CS), the intervals from the peak of the P wave (Ppeak) in lead V1 to the second component of the local atrial electrogram (A2) along the ablation line (Ppeak-A2) and from the end of the P wave (Pend) to A2 (Pend-A2) were investigated before and after complete block in the first 100 patients (training set). In the next 25 patients (validation set), Ppeak-A2 and Pend-A2 intervals were prospectively assessed to determine CTI block.

Results

The mean Ppeak-A2 and Pend-A2 immediately before complete block were − 15±24 and − 39±23 ms compared to 49 ± 17 and 21 ± 16 ms after CTI block (P < 0.0001). Ppeak-A2 ≥ 20 ms and Pend-A2 ≥ 0 ms predicted CTI block with 98% sensitivity and 95% specificity and 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity, respectively. In the validation set, the positive and negative predictive values of Ppeak-A2 ≥ 20 ms or Pend-A2 ≥ 0 ms were 100 and 96%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 98%.

Conclusions

During pacing from the CS, the temporal relationship between the P wave in lead V1 and A2 is a simple and reliable indicator of complete block during RFA of CTI-AFL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Feld GK, Fleck RP, Chen PS, Boyce K, Bahnson TD, Stein JB, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of human type 1 atrial flutter. Identification of a critical zone in the reentrant circuit by endocardial mapping techniques. Circulation. 1992;86:1233–40.CrossRef Feld GK, Fleck RP, Chen PS, Boyce K, Bahnson TD, Stein JB, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of human type 1 atrial flutter. Identification of a critical zone in the reentrant circuit by endocardial mapping techniques. Circulation. 1992;86:1233–40.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cosio FG, Lopez-Gil M, Goicolea A, Arribas F, Barroso JL. Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior vena cava-tricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:705–9.CrossRef Cosio FG, Lopez-Gil M, Goicolea A, Arribas F, Barroso JL. Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior vena cava-tricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:705–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Anselme F, Klug D, Scanu P, Poty H, Lacroix D, Kacet S, et al. Randomized comparison of two targets in typical atrial flutter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:1302–7.CrossRef Anselme F, Klug D, Scanu P, Poty H, Lacroix D, Kacet S, et al. Randomized comparison of two targets in typical atrial flutter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:1302–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kirkorian G, Moncada E, Chevalier P, Canu G, Claudel JP, Bellon C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach. Circulation. 1994;90:2804–14.CrossRef Kirkorian G, Moncada E, Chevalier P, Canu G, Claudel JP, Bellon C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach. Circulation. 1994;90:2804–14.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tada H, Oral H, Sticherling C, Chough SP, Baker RL, Wasmer K, et al. Double potentials along the ablation line as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:750–5.CrossRef Tada H, Oral H, Sticherling C, Chough SP, Baker RL, Wasmer K, et al. Double potentials along the ablation line as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:750–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fischer B, Haissaguerre M, Garrigues S, Poquet F, Gencel L, Clementy J, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 80 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1365–72.CrossRef Fischer B, Haissaguerre M, Garrigues S, Poquet F, Gencel L, Clementy J, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 80 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1365–72.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fischer B, Jais P, Shah D, Chouairi S, Haissaguerre M, Garrigues S, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 200 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:1225–33.CrossRef Fischer B, Jais P, Shah D, Chouairi S, Haissaguerre M, Garrigues S, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 200 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:1225–33.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Poty H, Saoudi N, Abdel Aziz A, Nair M, Letac B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter. Prediction of late success by electrophysiological criteria. Circulation. 1995;92:1389–92.CrossRef Poty H, Saoudi N, Abdel Aziz A, Nair M, Letac B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter. Prediction of late success by electrophysiological criteria. Circulation. 1995;92:1389–92.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Feld G, Wharton M, Plumb V, Daoud E, Friehling T, Epstein L. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter using large-tip 8- or 10-mm electrode catheters and a high-output radiofrequency energy generator: results of a multicenter safety and efficacy study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1466–72.CrossRef Feld G, Wharton M, Plumb V, Daoud E, Friehling T, Epstein L. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter using large-tip 8- or 10-mm electrode catheters and a high-output radiofrequency energy generator: results of a multicenter safety and efficacy study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1466–72.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cauchemez B, Haissaguerre M, Fischer B, Thomas O, Clementy J, Coumel P. Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus in common atrial flutter. Circulation. 1996;93:284–94.CrossRef Cauchemez B, Haissaguerre M, Fischer B, Thomas O, Clementy J, Coumel P. Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus in common atrial flutter. Circulation. 1996;93:284–94.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Poty H, Saoudi N, Nair M, Anselme F, Letac B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Further insights into the various types of isthmus block: application to ablation during sinus rhythm. Circulation. 1996;94:3204–13.CrossRef Poty H, Saoudi N, Nair M, Anselme F, Letac B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Further insights into the various types of isthmus block: application to ablation during sinus rhythm. Circulation. 1996;94:3204–13.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shah D, Haissaguerre M, Takahashi A, Jais P, Hocini M, Clementy J. Differential pacing for distinguishing block from persistent conduction through an ablation line. Circulation. 2000;102:1517–22.CrossRef Shah D, Haissaguerre M, Takahashi A, Jais P, Hocini M, Clementy J. Differential pacing for distinguishing block from persistent conduction through an ablation line. Circulation. 2000;102:1517–22.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Villacastin J, Almendral J, Arenal A, Castellano NP, Gonzalez S, Ortiz M, et al. Usefulness of unipolar electrograms to detect isthmus block after radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Circulation. 2000;102:3080–5.CrossRef Villacastin J, Almendral J, Arenal A, Castellano NP, Gonzalez S, Ortiz M, et al. Usefulness of unipolar electrograms to detect isthmus block after radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Circulation. 2000;102:3080–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Oral H, Sticherling C, Tada H, Chough SP, Baker RL, Wasmer K, et al. Role of transisthmus conduction intervals in predicting bidirectional block after ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001;12:169–74.CrossRef Oral H, Sticherling C, Tada H, Chough SP, Baker RL, Wasmer K, et al. Role of transisthmus conduction intervals in predicting bidirectional block after ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001;12:169–74.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Platonov PG. P-wave morphology: underlying mechanisms and clinical implications. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2012;17:161–9.CrossRef Platonov PG. P-wave morphology: underlying mechanisms and clinical implications. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2012;17:161–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schmieder S, Ndrepepa G, Dong J, Zrenner B, Schreieck J, Schneider MA, et al. Acute and long-term results of radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter and the influence of the right atrial isthmus ablation on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:956–62.CrossRef Schmieder S, Ndrepepa G, Dong J, Zrenner B, Schreieck J, Schneider MA, et al. Acute and long-term results of radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter and the influence of the right atrial isthmus ablation on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:956–62.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen J, de Chillou C, Basiouny T, Sadoul N, Filho JD, Magnin-Poull I, et al. Cavotricuspid isthmus mapping to assess bidirectional block during common atrial flutter radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 1999;100:2507–13.CrossRef Chen J, de Chillou C, Basiouny T, Sadoul N, Filho JD, Magnin-Poull I, et al. Cavotricuspid isthmus mapping to assess bidirectional block during common atrial flutter radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 1999;100:2507–13.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Anselme F, Savoure A, Cribier A, Saoudi N. Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter: a randomized comparison of 2 methods for determining complete bidirectional isthmus block. Circulation. 2001;103:1434–9.CrossRef Anselme F, Savoure A, Cribier A, Saoudi N. Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter: a randomized comparison of 2 methods for determining complete bidirectional isthmus block. Circulation. 2001;103:1434–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Scaglione M, Riccardi R, Calo L, Di Donna P, Lamberti F, Caponi D, et al. Typical atrial flutter ablation: conduction across the posterior region of the inferior vena cava orifice may mimic unidirectional isthmus block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:387–95.CrossRef Scaglione M, Riccardi R, Calo L, Di Donna P, Lamberti F, Caponi D, et al. Typical atrial flutter ablation: conduction across the posterior region of the inferior vena cava orifice may mimic unidirectional isthmus block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:387–95.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shah DC, Takahashi A, Jais P, Hocini M, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M. Local electrogram-based criteria of cavotricuspid isthmus block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:662–9.CrossRef Shah DC, Takahashi A, Jais P, Hocini M, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M. Local electrogram-based criteria of cavotricuspid isthmus block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:662–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The relationship between the P wave and local atrial electrogram in predicting conduction block during catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter
Authors
Miki Yokokawa
Mohamad C. Sinno
Mohammed Saeed
Rakesh Latchamsetty
Hamid Ghanbari
Thomas Crawford
Krit Jongnarangsin
Ryan Cunnane
Frank Pelosi Jr
Frank Bogun
Aman Chugh
Fred Morady
Hakan Oral
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0378-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2018 Go to the issue