Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 3/2018

01-06-2018

The Quality of Romanian Breast Cancer Websites: a Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment

Authors: Valentin Nădăşan, Anca Noela Roşca, Monica Tarcea, Zoltán Ábrám, Marius Măruşteri

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The Internet has become an important source of overall health information and seems to be the second common source of information used by patients in the process of decision-making before breast surgery. The goal of this study was to monitor Romanian breast cancer websites and their quality over a period of 5 years. We evaluated a sample of 20 websites selected from Google’s first search results pages using specific rating scores for e-health quality, completeness, accuracy, and potential risk, in 2011 and 2016, respectively. Only 15 (75%) of the websites in the 2011 sample were accessible in 2016 and only two (10%) retained real-life visibility (Google PageRank < 20). The mean quality scores at baseline (2011) and follow-up (2016), respectively, were as follows: e-health quality 3.80 vs. 4.05; completeness 4.23 vs. 5.43; accuracy 5.74 vs. 6.35; and potential risk score 7.60 vs. 7.30. All quality scores were low or, at best, modest and did not improve significantly over the 5-year period. The results of the study draw attention to the need for programs aiming to improve the ability of breast cancer patients to screen the online health resources and to better regulate the medical Internet to safeguard the best interest of health information seekers.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Schmidt H, Cohen A, Mandeli J, Weltz C, Port ER (2016) Decision-making in breast cancer surgery: where do patients go for information? Am Surg 82:397–402PubMed Schmidt H, Cohen A, Mandeli J, Weltz C, Port ER (2016) Decision-making in breast cancer surgery: where do patients go for information? Am Surg 82:397–402PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kowalski C, Kahana E, Kuhr K, Ansmann L, Pfaff H (2014) Changes over time in the utilization of disease-related Internet information in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients 2007 to 2013. J Med Internet Res 16:e195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kowalski C, Kahana E, Kuhr K, Ansmann L, Pfaff H (2014) Changes over time in the utilization of disease-related Internet information in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients 2007 to 2013. J Med Internet Res 16:e195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Weaver JB III, Thompson NJ, Weaver SS, Hopkins GL (2009) Healthcare non-adherence decisions and internet health information. Comput Hum Behav 25:1373–1380CrossRef Weaver JB III, Thompson NJ, Weaver SS, Hopkins GL (2009) Healthcare non-adherence decisions and internet health information. Comput Hum Behav 25:1373–1380CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Autier P, Boniol M, La Vecchia C, Vatten L, Gavin A, Héry C, Heanue M (2010) Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database. BMJ 341:c3620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Autier P, Boniol M, La Vecchia C, Vatten L, Gavin A, Héry C, Heanue M (2010) Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database. BMJ 341:c3620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Schwartz KL, Roe T, Northrup J, Meza J, Seifeldin R, Neale AV (2006) Family medicine patients’ use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Med 19:39–45CrossRefPubMed Schwartz KL, Roe T, Northrup J, Meza J, Seifeldin R, Neale AV (2006) Family medicine patients’ use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Med 19:39–45CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Walji M, Sagaram S, Sagaram D, Meric-Bernstam F, Johnson C, Mirza NQ, Bernstam EV (2004) Efficacy of quality criteria to identify potentially harmful information: a cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine web sites. J Med Internet Res 6:e21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walji M, Sagaram S, Sagaram D, Meric-Bernstam F, Johnson C, Mirza NQ, Bernstam EV (2004) Efficacy of quality criteria to identify potentially harmful information: a cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine web sites. J Med Internet Res 6:e21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Markman M (2002) Safety issues in using complementary and alternative medicine. J Clin Oncol 20(18 Suppl):39S–41SPubMed Markman M (2002) Safety issues in using complementary and alternative medicine. J Clin Oncol 20(18 Suppl):39S–41SPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, Sood V, Kubeck J, Paulino C, Merola AA (2005) Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet. Spine 30:2695–2700CrossRefPubMed Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, Sood V, Kubeck J, Paulino C, Merola AA (2005) Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet. Spine 30:2695–2700CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, Kubeck J, Gerling MC (2010) Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J 10:350–354CrossRefPubMed Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, Kubeck J, Gerling MC (2010) Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J 10:350–354CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bedell SE, Agrawal A, Petersen LE (2004) A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians. Int J Med Inform 73:687–694CrossRefPubMed Bedell SE, Agrawal A, Petersen LE (2004) A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians. Int J Med Inform 73:687–694CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sutherland LA, Wildemuth B, Campbell MK, Haines PS (2005) Unraveling the web: an evaluation of the content quality, usability, and readability of nutrition web sites. J Nutr Educ Behav 37:300–305CrossRefPubMed Sutherland LA, Wildemuth B, Campbell MK, Haines PS (2005) Unraveling the web: an evaluation of the content quality, usability, and readability of nutrition web sites. J Nutr Educ Behav 37:300–305CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nădăşan V, Voidăzan S, Tarcea M, Ureche R (2011) The quality of information about influenza on the Romanian Internet. Acta Medica Transilvanica 2:312–314 Nădăşan V, Voidăzan S, Tarcea M, Ureche R (2011) The quality of information about influenza on the Romanian Internet. Acta Medica Transilvanica 2:312–314
19.
go back to reference Nădăşan V, Vancea G, Georgescu PA, Tarcea M, Abram Z (2011) The credibility, completeness and accuracy of information about first aid in case of choking on the Romanian websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods 6:18–26 Nădăşan V, Vancea G, Georgescu PA, Tarcea M, Abram Z (2011) The credibility, completeness and accuracy of information about first aid in case of choking on the Romanian websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods 6:18–26
20.
go back to reference Nghiem AZ, Mahmoud Y, Som R (2016) Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer. Breast 25:34–37CrossRefPubMed Nghiem AZ, Mahmoud Y, Som R (2016) Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer. Breast 25:34–37CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Muñoz JA, Puyol JA, Lara M, Watkins KE, Yang H, McGlynn EA (2001) Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 285:2612–2621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Muñoz JA, Puyol JA, Lara M, Watkins KE, Yang H, McGlynn EA (2001) Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 285:2612–2621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
23.
go back to reference Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS (2002) Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ 324:581–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS (2002) Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ 324:581–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Eysenbach G, Köhler C (2002) How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 324:573–577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eysenbach G, Köhler C (2002) How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 324:573–577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The Quality of Romanian Breast Cancer Websites: a Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment
Authors
Valentin Nădăşan
Anca Noela Roşca
Monica Tarcea
Zoltán Ábrám
Marius Măruşteri
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1145-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Cancer Education 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine