Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2015

01-12-2015 | Oncology

The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?

Authors: Ravivarma Balasubramaniam, Manil Subesinghe, Jonathan T. Smith

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify the changes in multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) workload for consultant radiologists working in a single UK tertiary referral cancer institution, assess its impact and suggest solutions to these challenges.

Methods

The annual number of MDTM cases was collated over a 5-year period (2009 − 2013). Qualitative information was obtained through questionnaire-based interviews of 47 consultant radiologists. Data analysed included number of MDTMs involved with, type of MDTM (oncological or non-oncological), time allocation for preparation and perceived deficiencies in the current MDTM.

Results

Thirteen thousand and forty-nine cases were discussed in MDTMs in 2009 with a continued yearly increase over the 5-year period. Fifty-five percent of MDTM attendances were at oncological MDTMs. Consultant radiologists attended a median of two MDTMs per week, each requiring 4 hours time commitment; 60 % used out-of-hours time for MDTM preparation. The most frequently cited MDTM deficiency was lack of sufficient clinical input.

Conclusions

The MDTM is a challenging but worthwhile demand on the modern radiologist’s time. Solutions to the increasing MDTM workload include demonstration of the benefits of MDTMs to hospital administrators to justify additional resources required, improving MDTM efficiency and ensuring this increased workload is accurately represented and remunerated in individual job plans.

Key Points

MDTMs improve cancer outcomes and are being recommended for non-oncological conditions.
MDTM cases have more than doubled over 5 years at our institution.
Incorporating MDTM workload into current consultant radiologist job plans is difficult.
Solutions include demonstrating MDTM related benefits, improved efficiency, and accurate job planning.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L et al (1995) Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 345:1265–1270CrossRefPubMed Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L et al (1995) Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 345:1265–1270CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Birkmeyer NJO, Goodney PP, Stukel TA et al (2005) Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer 103:435–441CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer NJO, Goodney PP, Stukel TA et al (2005) Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer 103:435–441CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Griffith C, Turner J (2004) United Kingdom National Health Service, Cancer Services Collaborative "Improvement Partnership”, Redesign of Cancer Services. A National Approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(Suppl 1):1–86PubMed Griffith C, Turner J (2004) United Kingdom National Health Service, Cancer Services Collaborative "Improvement Partnership”, Redesign of Cancer Services. A National Approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(Suppl 1):1–86PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George DW et al (2012) Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13722 women. BMJ 344, e2718PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George DW et al (2012) Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13722 women. BMJ 344, e2718PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD (1997) Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work? Cancer 79:2380–2384CrossRefPubMed Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD (1997) Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work? Cancer 79:2380–2384CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H et al (2001) The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 91:1231–1237CrossRefPubMed Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H et al (2001) The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 91:1231–1237CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kurpad R, Kim W, Rathmell WK et al (2011) A multidisciplinary approach to the management of urologic malignancies: does it influence diagnostic and treatment decisions? Urol Oncol 29:378–382CrossRefPubMed Kurpad R, Kim W, Rathmell WK et al (2011) A multidisciplinary approach to the management of urologic malignancies: does it influence diagnostic and treatment decisions? Urol Oncol 29:378–382CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Crawford R, Greenberg D (2012) Improvements in survival of gynaecological cancer in the Anglia region of England: are these an effect of centralisation of care and use of multidisciplinary management? BJOG 119:160–165CrossRefPubMed Crawford R, Greenberg D (2012) Improvements in survival of gynaecological cancer in the Anglia region of England: are these an effect of centralisation of care and use of multidisciplinary management? BJOG 119:160–165CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS et al (2005) An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 93:977–978PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS et al (2005) An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 93:977–978PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bydder S, Nowak A, Marion K et al (2009) The impact of case discussion at a multidisciplinary team meeting on the treatment and survival of patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Intern Med J 39:838–841CrossRefPubMed Bydder S, Nowak A, Marion K et al (2009) The impact of case discussion at a multidisciplinary team meeting on the treatment and survival of patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Intern Med J 39:838–841CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR et al (2006) MRI directed multidisciplinary team pre-operative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? Br J Cancer 94:351–357PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR et al (2006) MRI directed multidisciplinary team pre-operative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? Br J Cancer 94:351–357PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS et al (2006) The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 95:979–985PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS et al (2006) The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 95:979–985PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009) Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Color Dis 11:291–295CrossRef MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009) Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Color Dis 11:291–295CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG et al (2008) Colorectal MDTs: the team's perspective. Color Dis 10:63–68CrossRef Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG et al (2008) Colorectal MDTs: the team's perspective. Color Dis 10:63–68CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jalil R, Ahmed M, Green JSA et al (2013) Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Int J Surg 11:389–394CrossRefPubMed Jalil R, Ahmed M, Green JSA et al (2013) Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Int J Surg 11:389–394CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sidham MA, Poulsen MG (2006) Multidisciplinary care in oncology; medicolegal implications of group decisions. Lancet Oncol 7:951–954CrossRef Sidham MA, Poulsen MG (2006) Multidisciplinary care in oncology; medicolegal implications of group decisions. Lancet Oncol 7:951–954CrossRef
24.
Metadata
Title
The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?
Authors
Ravivarma Balasubramaniam
Manil Subesinghe
Jonathan T. Smith
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3760-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

European Radiology 12/2015 Go to the issue