Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2002

01-03-2002 | Leading Article

The Product Label

How Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Reach the Prescriber

Authors: Dr Patrick J. Marroum, Jogarao Gobburu

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 3/2002

Login to get access

Abstract

The product label, or package insert, is the ‘manual’ for the safe and effective use of a drug. Important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a drug product should appear in the label under specific sections, as required in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), using a format and language recommended by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in various guidances to the industry. The relevant regulations and guidance documents impacting on how this information is conveyed to the healthcare professional are discussed, with special emphasis on how the new proposed rule will impact upon how information is to be conveyed. With the availability of new clinical pharmacology information not available at the time of approval, package inserts for older drugs should be updated to reflect the new data and recommend the proper dosage regimen, enabling prescribers to optimise drug therapy and minimise possible adverse events.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peck CC, Barr WH, Benet LZ, et al. Opportunities for integration of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicokinetics in rational drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992 Apr; 51(4): 465–73PubMedCrossRef Peck CC, Barr WH, Benet LZ, et al. Opportunities for integration of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicokinetics in rational drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992 Apr; 51(4): 465–73PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference General requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs, Code of Federal Regulations, 21 Part 201.56. Revised as of 1 April 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000 General requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs, Code of Federal Regulations, 21 Part 201.56. Revised as of 1 April 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000
3.
go back to reference Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs, Code of Federal Regulations, 21 Part 201.57. Revised as of 1 April 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000 Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs, Code of Federal Regulations, 21 Part 201.57. Revised as of 1 April 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000
4.
go back to reference FDA Guidance for Industry. Providing clinical evidence of effectiveness for human drug and biological drugs. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1998 May FDA Guidance for Industry. Providing clinical evidence of effectiveness for human drug and biological drugs. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1998 May
5.
go back to reference FDA Draft Guidance for Industry. General considerations for pediatric pharmacokinetic studies for drugs and biological products. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1998 Nov FDA Draft Guidance for Industry. General considerations for pediatric pharmacokinetic studies for drugs and biological products. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1998 Nov
6.
go back to reference Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs, Code of Federal Regulations, 21 Part 201.57 (f)(10). Revised as of 1 April 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs, Code of Federal Regulations, 21 Part 201.57 (f)(10). Revised as of 1 April 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office
7.
go back to reference Viagra® (sildenafil citrate) [package insert]. Groton (CT): Pfizer, 2001 Viagra® (sildenafil citrate) [package insert]. Groton (CT): Pfizer, 2001
8.
go back to reference FDA guidance for industry. Pharmacokinetics in patients with renal function — study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1998 May FDA guidance for industry. Pharmacokinetics in patients with renal function — study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1998 May
9.
go back to reference Draft FDA guidance for industry. Pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired hepatic function: study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1999 Nov Draft FDA guidance for industry. Pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired hepatic function: study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1999 Nov
10.
go back to reference FDA guidance for industry. Drug metabolism/drug interaction studies in the drug development process: studies in vitro. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1997 Apr FDA guidance for industry. Drug metabolism/drug interaction studies in the drug development process: studies in vitro. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1997 Apr
11.
go back to reference FDA guidance for industry. In vivo drug metabolism/drug interaction studies-study design, data analysis, and recommendations for dosing and labeling. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1999 Nov FDA guidance for industry. In vivo drug metabolism/drug interaction studies-study design, data analysis, and recommendations for dosing and labeling. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1999 Nov
12.
go back to reference Yuan R, Parmelee T, Balian J, et al. In vitro metabolic interaction studies: experience of the Food and Drug Administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66: 9–15PubMedCrossRef Yuan R, Parmelee T, Balian J, et al. In vitro metabolic interaction studies: experience of the Food and Drug Administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66: 9–15PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference FDA guidance for industry. Population pharmacokinetics. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1999 Feb FDA guidance for industry. Population pharmacokinetics. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1999 Feb
14.
go back to reference Draft FDA guidance for industry. Food effect bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1997 Oct Draft FDA guidance for industry. Food effect bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1997 Oct
15.
go back to reference Requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs and biologics, requirements for prescription drug products labels, proposed rule. Fed Regist, 2000 Dec 22; 65: 247 Requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs and biologics, requirements for prescription drug products labels, proposed rule. Fed Regist, 2000 Dec 22; 65: 247
16.
go back to reference National Biosystems Inc. Focus Group Report. Physician’s perceptions of prescription drug labeling information. Contract No. 223-91-3501, 1992 Feb National Biosystems Inc. Focus Group Report. Physician’s perceptions of prescription drug labeling information. Contract No. 223-91-3501, 1992 Feb
17.
go back to reference Spyker D, Harvey E, Harvey B, et al. Assessment and reporting of clinical pharmacology information in drug labeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000 Mar; 67(3): 196–200PubMedCrossRef Spyker D, Harvey E, Harvey B, et al. Assessment and reporting of clinical pharmacology information in drug labeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000 Mar; 67(3): 196–200PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Avapro® (irbesartan) [package insert]. Princeton (NJ): Bristol Myers Squibb, 2001 Avapro® (irbesartan) [package insert]. Princeton (NJ): Bristol Myers Squibb, 2001
19.
go back to reference Toprol XL® (metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets) [package insert]. Westborough (MA): AstraZeneca, 2001 Toprol XL® (metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets) [package insert]. Westborough (MA): AstraZeneca, 2001
Metadata
Title
The Product Label
How Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Reach the Prescriber
Authors
Dr Patrick J. Marroum
Jogarao Gobburu
Publication date
01-03-2002
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 3/2002
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200241030-00001

Other articles of this Issue 3/2002

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2002 Go to the issue