Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 2/2008

01-06-2008 | Original Article

The outcome of computed tomography in patients with acute renal colic from a low-volume hospital

Authors: L. Lund, U. L. Larsen, E. Andersen, N. T. Mikkelsen, G. Holt

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the interobserver variability of unenhanced helical computed tomography (UHCT) in patients with acute renal colic admitted into a low-volume hospital.

Materials and methods

All admissions with acute renal colic between August 2002 and February 2004 (18 months) were registered. A total of 133 CT scans were performed on patients suspected of having a stone in the urinary tract (<24 h after admission). All records were subsequently evaluated, the acute CT scans were re-evaluated by a radiological specialist. Interobserver agreements were assessed by means of Kappa analysis.

Results

A total of 133 consecutive patients met the criteria for inclusion, of whom 62 were women and 71 were men. A total of 67 stones in 53 patients were identified. The variability of the radiological diagnosis (doctors under training and one consultant) was calculated, and the Kappa values were +0.66 and +0.69 for stones on the right and left side, respectively. The Kappa values for stones in ureter and the kidney were +0.79 and +0.52, respectively. In addition to stone disease, there were additional diagnoses in 30 patients (23%), out of whom seven had a malignant tumor.

Conclusion

In a low-volume hospital with fewer than 100 procedures a year, we found the UHCT method to be safe and reliable with a good interobserver agreement and Kappa value.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lindqvist K (2004) On the diagnosis and treatment of upper urinary tract stones. PhD thesis, Gothenburg Lindqvist K (2004) On the diagnosis and treatment of upper urinary tract stones. PhD thesis, Gothenburg
2.
go back to reference Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, Essenmacher KR, Verga M, Glickman MG, Lange RC (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 195:789–794 Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, Essenmacher KR, Verga M, Glickman MG, Lange RC (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 195:789–794
3.
go back to reference Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioglu A, Luleci E (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8:212–217PubMedCrossRef Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioglu A, Luleci E (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8:212–217PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Incidental diagnosis of diseases on un-enhanced helical computed tomography performed for ureteric colic. BMC Urol 3:2–8PubMedCrossRef Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Incidental diagnosis of diseases on un-enhanced helical computed tomography performed for ureteric colic. BMC Urol 3:2–8PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Int J Urol 10:287–292PubMedCrossRef Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Int J Urol 10:287–292PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ha M, MacDonald RD (2004) Impact of CT scan in patients with first episode of suspected nephrolithiasis. J Emerg Med 27:225–231PubMedCrossRef Ha M, MacDonald RD (2004) Impact of CT scan in patients with first episode of suspected nephrolithiasis. J Emerg Med 27:225–231PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Katz DS, Scheer M, Lumerman JM, Mellinger BC, Stillman CA, Lane MJ (2000) Alternative or additional diagnosis on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations. Urology 56:53–57PubMedCrossRef Katz DS, Scheer M, Lumerman JM, Mellinger BC, Stillman CA, Lane MJ (2000) Alternative or additional diagnosis on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations. Urology 56:53–57PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW, Namkung S, Kim HC, Hwang WC, Choi KM, Park JK, Han TI, Kang W (2005) Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal coilc: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 7:756–763CrossRef Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW, Namkung S, Kim HC, Hwang WC, Choi KM, Park JK, Han TI, Kang W (2005) Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal coilc: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 7:756–763CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan MS, Graham IR, Goff WB, Kane CJ (1998) Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of the acute flank pain. Urology 52:982–987PubMedCrossRef Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan MS, Graham IR, Goff WB, Kane CJ (1998) Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of the acute flank pain. Urology 52:982–987PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vieweg J, The C, Freed K, Leder RA, Smith RH, Nelson RH, Preminger GM (1998) Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. J Urol 160:679–684PubMedCrossRef Vieweg J, The C, Freed K, Leder RA, Smith RH, Nelson RH, Preminger GM (1998) Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. J Urol 160:679–684PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Memarsadeghi M, Heinz-Peer G, Helbich TH, Schaefer-Prokop C, Kramer G, Scharitzer M, Prokop M (2005) Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology 235:530–536PubMedCrossRef Memarsadeghi M, Heinz-Peer G, Helbich TH, Schaefer-Prokop C, Kramer G, Scharitzer M, Prokop M (2005) Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology 235:530–536PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Longo J, Akbar SA, Schaff T, Jafri ZH, Jackson RF (2001) A prospective comparative study of non-contrast helical computed tomography and intravenous urogram fort the assessment of renal colic. Emerg Radiol 8:285–292CrossRef Longo J, Akbar SA, Schaff T, Jafri ZH, Jackson RF (2001) A prospective comparative study of non-contrast helical computed tomography and intravenous urogram fort the assessment of renal colic. Emerg Radiol 8:285–292CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lindqvist K, Berntsson A, Grenabo KGL, et al. (2007) Computed tomography versus urography in patients with renal colic. Scand J Urol (in press) Lindqvist K, Berntsson A, Grenabo KGL, et al. (2007) Computed tomography versus urography in patients with renal colic. Scand J Urol (in press)
14.
go back to reference Bird VG, Gomez-Marin O, Leveillee RJ, Sfakianakis GN, Rivas LA, Amendola MA (2002) A comparison of unenhanced helical computerized tomography findings and renal obstruction determined by furosemid 99 m technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic scintirenography for patients with acute renal colic. J Urol 167:1597–1603PubMedCrossRef Bird VG, Gomez-Marin O, Leveillee RJ, Sfakianakis GN, Rivas LA, Amendola MA (2002) A comparison of unenhanced helical computerized tomography findings and renal obstruction determined by furosemid 99 m technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic scintirenography for patients with acute renal colic. J Urol 167:1597–1603PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Niall O, Russell J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J (1999) A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol 161:534–537PubMedCrossRef Niall O, Russell J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J (1999) A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol 161:534–537PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Denton ER, Mackenzie A, Greenwell T, Popert R, Rankin SC (1999) Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic-is the radiation dose justifiable? Clin Radiol 54:444–447PubMedCrossRef Denton ER, Mackenzie A, Greenwell T, Popert R, Rankin SC (1999) Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic-is the radiation dose justifiable? Clin Radiol 54:444–447PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Connolly SS, Younis C, Meade W, Gallagher R, Lovett R, Brady A, Fitzgerald E, Rogers E, Sweeney P (2004) Can computed tomography in the protocol for renal colic be interpreted by Urologists? Br J Urol Int 94:1332–1335 Connolly SS, Younis C, Meade W, Gallagher R, Lovett R, Brady A, Fitzgerald E, Rogers E, Sweeney P (2004) Can computed tomography in the protocol for renal colic be interpreted by Urologists? Br J Urol Int 94:1332–1335
Metadata
Title
The outcome of computed tomography in patients with acute renal colic from a low-volume hospital
Authors
L. Lund
U. L. Larsen
E. Andersen
N. T. Mikkelsen
G. Holt
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-007-9264-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

International Urology and Nephrology 2/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine