Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Commentary

The ongoing violence against women: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Authors: Jacinta K. Muteshi, Suellen Miller, José M. Belizán

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) comprises different practices involving cutting, pricking, removing and sometimes sewing up external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. The practice of FGM/C is highly concentrated in a band of African countries from the Atlantic coast to the Horn of Africa, in areas of the Middle East such as Iraq and Yemen, and in some countries in Asia like Indonesia. Girls exposed to FGM/C are at risk of immediate physical consequences such as severe pain, bleeding, and shock, difficulty in passing urine and faeces, and sepsis. Long-term consequences can include chronic pain and infections. FGM/C is a deeply entrenched social norm, perpetrated by families for a variety of reasons, but the results are harmful. FGM/C is a human rights issue that affects girls and women worldwide. The practice is decreasing, due to intensive advocacy activities of international, national, and grassroots agencies. An adolescent girl today is about a third less likely to be cut than 30 years ago. However, the rates of abandonment are not high enough, and change is not happening as rapidly as necessary. Multiple interventions have been implemented, but the evidence base on what works is lacking. We in reproductive health must work harder to find strategies to help communities and families abandon these harmful practices.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Ghadially R. All for “Izzat”. Newsl Womens Glob Netw Reprod Rights. 1992;38:7–8. Ghadially R. All for “Izzat”. Newsl Womens Glob Netw Reprod Rights. 1992;38:7–8.
5.
go back to reference Rashid AK, Patil SS, Valimalar AS. The Practice of Female Genital Mutilation among the Rural Malays in North Malaysia’. The Internet Journal of Third World Medicine. 2010;9(1):1–8. Rashid AK, Patil SS, Valimalar AS. The Practice of Female Genital Mutilation among the Rural Malays in North Malaysia’. The Internet Journal of Third World Medicine. 2010;9(1):1–8.
7.
go back to reference Alsibiani SA, Rouzi AA. Sexual Function in Women with Female Genital Mutilation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(3):722–4.CrossRefPubMed Alsibiani SA, Rouzi AA. Sexual Function in Women with Female Genital Mutilation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(3):722–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kvello A, Sayed L. ‘Omskjering av kvinner i de forente arabiske emirater—er klitoridektomi i tradisjonell praksis et overgrep mot kvinner?’ (Concerning Female Circumcision in the United Arab Emirates: Is clitoridectomy in a traditional context an assault against women?), Thesis paper. Oslo: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo; 2002. Kvello A, Sayed L. ‘Omskjering av kvinner i de forente arabiske emirater—er klitoridektomi i tradisjonell praksis et overgrep mot kvinner?’ (Concerning Female Circumcision in the United Arab Emirates: Is clitoridectomy in a traditional context an assault against women?), Thesis paper. Oslo: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo; 2002.
10.
go back to reference Al-Hussaini TK. Female genital cutting: types, motives and perineal damage in laboring Egyptian women. Med Princ Pract. 2003;12(2):123–8.CrossRefPubMed Al-Hussaini TK. Female genital cutting: types, motives and perineal damage in laboring Egyptian women. Med Princ Pract. 2003;12(2):123–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Turner D. Female genital cutting: implications for nurses. Nurs Womens Health. 2007;11(4):366–72.CrossRefPubMed Turner D. Female genital cutting: implications for nurses. Nurs Womens Health. 2007;11(4):366–72.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Banks E, Meirik O, Farley T, Akande O, Bathija H, et al. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1835–41.CrossRefPubMed Banks E, Meirik O, Farley T, Akande O, Bathija H, et al. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1835–41.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shell-Duncan B, Sherlund Y. Are there “stages of change” in the practice of female genital cutting?: Qualitative research findings from Senegal and The Gambia. Afr J Reprod Health. 2006;10(2):57–71.CrossRefPubMed Shell-Duncan B, Sherlund Y. Are there “stages of change” in the practice of female genital cutting?: Qualitative research findings from Senegal and The Gambia. Afr J Reprod Health. 2006;10(2):57–71.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Berg RC, Denison E. Effectiveness of interventions designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43(2):135–46.CrossRefPubMed Berg RC, Denison E. Effectiveness of interventions designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43(2):135–46.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The ongoing violence against women: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
Authors
Jacinta K. Muteshi
Suellen Miller
José M. Belizán
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0159-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Reproductive Health 1/2015 Go to the issue