Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2011

01-01-2011 | Breast Oncology

The Number of Axillary Lymph Nodes Involved with Metastatic Breast Cancer Does not Affect Outcome as Long as All Disease is Confined to the Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Authors: James W. Jakub, MD, Kanesha Bryant, MD, Marianne Huebner, PhD, Tanya Hoskin, MS, Judy C. Boughey, MD, Carol Reynolds, MD, Amy C. Degnim, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In breast cancer, a direct relationship exists between prognosis and the number of lymph nodes involved with metastatic disease. This study was undertaken to determine whether metastatic disease confined to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) has better prognosis than metastatic disease spread to non-SLNs, regardless of the number of nodes involved.

Methods

The study group consisted of 449 breast cancer patients with positive axillary SLN who underwent regional nodal dissection. Cox proportional-hazard regression models were used to assess the association of the number of positive SLNs and non-SLNs with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

In patients with disease confined to the SLNs, as the number of positive SLNs increased the OS and DFS remained the same. Once disease was present beyond the SLN, both DFS and OS were negatively impacted. On multivariate analysis non-SLN status remained an independent predictor of OS. A direct comparison was performed on the subset of patients with two positive lymph nodes. Group 1 had all disease confined to the SLNs (two positive SLNs), and group 2 had non-SLN disease (one positive SLN and one positive non-SLN). Despite an identical number of positive nodes, the OS rates were significantly worse in the group with disease present in a non-SLN (P = 0.004).

Conclusion

The number of nodes involved with metastatic disease does not impact OS and DFS if all disease is confined to the SLNs. Non-SLN involvement negatively influences OS and DFS independent of the number of positive nodes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer. 1989;63(1):181–7.CrossRefPubMed Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer. 1989;63(1):181–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nemoto T, et al. Management and survival of female breast cancer: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons. Cancer. 1980;45(12):2917–24.CrossRefPubMed Nemoto T, et al. Management and survival of female breast cancer: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons. Cancer. 1980;45(12):2917–24.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Green FL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M (eds). Breast, in AJCC Cancer Staging Manual VII. New York: Springer; 2002, Green FL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M (eds). Breast, in AJCC Cancer Staging Manual VII. New York: Springer; 2002,
4.
go back to reference Degnim AC, et al. Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg. 2005;190(4):543–50.CrossRefPubMed Degnim AC, et al. Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg. 2005;190(4):543–50.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ishwaran H, et al. A novel approach to cancer staging: application to esophageal cancer. Biostatistics. 2009;10(4):603–20.CrossRefPubMed Ishwaran H, et al. A novel approach to cancer staging: application to esophageal cancer. Biostatistics. 2009;10(4):603–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Van Zee KJ, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(10):1140–51.CrossRefPubMed Van Zee KJ, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(10):1140–51.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, et al. Prediction of sentinel lymph node-only disease in women with invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):882–7.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar AB, et al. Prediction of sentinel lymph node-only disease in women with invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):882–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Scow JS, et al. Simple prediction models for breast cancer patients with solitary positive sentinel nodes—are they valid? Breast J. 2009;15(6):610–614.CrossRefPubMed Scow JS, et al. Simple prediction models for breast cancer patients with solitary positive sentinel nodes—are they valid? Breast J. 2009;15(6):610–614.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gur AS, et al. Predictive probability of four different breast cancer nomograms for nonsentinel axillary lymph node metastasis in positive sentinel node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(2):229–35.CrossRefPubMed Gur AS, et al. Predictive probability of four different breast cancer nomograms for nonsentinel axillary lymph node metastasis in positive sentinel node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(2):229–35.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Alran S, et al. Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(8):2195–201.CrossRefPubMed Alran S, et al. Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(8):2195–201.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Scow JS, et al. Assessment of the performance of the Stanford Online Calculator for the prediction of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2009;115(18):4064–70.CrossRefPubMed Scow JS, et al. Assessment of the performance of the Stanford Online Calculator for the prediction of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2009;115(18):4064–70.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Takeuchi H, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y. Sentinel lymph node as a target of molecular diagnosis of lymphatic micrometastasis and local immunoresponse to malignant cells. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(3):441–50.CrossRefPubMed Takeuchi H, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y. Sentinel lymph node as a target of molecular diagnosis of lymphatic micrometastasis and local immunoresponse to malignant cells. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(3):441–50.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rinderknecht M, Detmar M. Tumor lymphangiogenesis and melanoma metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2008;216(2):347–54.CrossRefPubMed Rinderknecht M, Detmar M. Tumor lymphangiogenesis and melanoma metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2008;216(2):347–54.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gajewski TF, et al. Immune resistance orchestrated by the tumor microenvironment. Immunol Rev. 2006;213:131–45.CrossRefPubMed Gajewski TF, et al. Immune resistance orchestrated by the tumor microenvironment. Immunol Rev. 2006;213:131–45.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Allavena P, et al. The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: the role of tumor-associated macrophages. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;66(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed Allavena P, et al. The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: the role of tumor-associated macrophages. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;66(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nevala WK, et al. Evidence of systemic Th2-driven chronic inflammation in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(6):1931–9.CrossRefPubMed Nevala WK, et al. Evidence of systemic Th2-driven chronic inflammation in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(6):1931–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ehi K, et al. Analysis of T-helper type 1 and 2 cells and T-cytotoxic type 1 and 2 cells of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2008;19(3):601–7.PubMed Ehi K, et al. Analysis of T-helper type 1 and 2 cells and T-cytotoxic type 1 and 2 cells of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2008;19(3):601–7.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Jakub JW, et al. The number of lymph nodes involved with metastatic disease does not affect outcome in melanoma patients as long as all disease is confined to the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(8):2245–51.CrossRefPubMed Jakub JW, et al. The number of lymph nodes involved with metastatic disease does not affect outcome in melanoma patients as long as all disease is confined to the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(8):2245–51.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ariyan C, et al. Positive nonsentinel node status predicts mortality in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(1):186–90.CrossRefPubMed Ariyan C, et al. Positive nonsentinel node status predicts mortality in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(1):186–90.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ghaferi AA, et al. Prognostic significance of a positive nonsentinel lymph node in cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):2978–84.CrossRefPubMed Ghaferi AA, et al. Prognostic significance of a positive nonsentinel lymph node in cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):2978–84.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Cox C, et al. The clinical relevance of positive sentinel nodes only versus positive nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2003;186(4):333–6.CrossRefPubMed Cox C, et al. The clinical relevance of positive sentinel nodes only versus positive nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2003;186(4):333–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Reynolds C, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with metastasis: can axillary dissection be avoided in some patients with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(6):1720–6.PubMed Reynolds C, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with metastasis: can axillary dissection be avoided in some patients with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(6):1720–6.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Sabel MS, et al. Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in predicting nodal status in patients with breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2001;77(4):243–6.CrossRefPubMed Sabel MS, et al. Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in predicting nodal status in patients with breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2001;77(4):243–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chu KU, et al. Sentinel node metastasis in patients with breast carcinoma accurately predicts immunohistochemically detectable nonsentinel node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(8):756–61.CrossRefPubMed Chu KU, et al. Sentinel node metastasis in patients with breast carcinoma accurately predicts immunohistochemically detectable nonsentinel node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(8):756–61.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Czerniecki BJ, et al. Immunohistochemistry with pancytokeratins improves the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;85(5):1098–103.CrossRefPubMed Czerniecki BJ, et al. Immunohistochemistry with pancytokeratins improves the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;85(5):1098–103.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Number of Axillary Lymph Nodes Involved with Metastatic Breast Cancer Does not Affect Outcome as Long as All Disease is Confined to the Sentinel Lymph Nodes
Authors
James W. Jakub, MD
Kanesha Bryant, MD
Marianne Huebner, PhD
Tanya Hoskin, MS
Judy C. Boughey, MD
Carol Reynolds, MD
Amy C. Degnim, MD
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1202-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2011 Go to the issue