Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Opinion

The new field of ‘precision psychiatry’

Authors: Brisa S. Fernandes, Leanne M. Williams, Johann Steiner, Marion Leboyer, André F. Carvalho, Michael Berk

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Precision medicine is a new and important topic in psychiatry. Psychiatry has not yet benefited from the advanced diagnostic and therapeutic technologies that form an integral part of other clinical specialties. Thus, the vision of precision medicine as applied to psychiatry – ‘precision psychiatry’ – promises to be even more transformative than in other fields of medicine, which have already lessened the translational gap.

Discussion

Herein, we describe ‘precision psychiatry’ and how its several implications promise to transform the psychiatric landscape. We pay particular attention to biomarkers and to how the development of new technologies now makes their discovery possible and timely. The adoption of the term ‘precision psychiatry’ will help propel the field, since the current term ‘precision medicine’, as applied to psychiatry, is impractical and does not appropriately distinguish the field. Naming the field ‘precision psychiatry’ will help establish a stronger, unique identity to what promises to be the most important area in psychiatry in years to come.

Conclusion

In summary, we provide a wide-angle lens overview of what this new field is, suggest how to propel the field forward, and provide a vision of the near future, with ‘precision psychiatry’ representing a paradigm shift that promises to change the landscape of how psychiatry is currently conceived.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Toward Precision Medicine. Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. National Research Council Committee on a Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. Toward Precision Medicine. Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. National Research Council Committee on a Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
4.
go back to reference Vieta E. Personalised medicine applied to mental health: Precision psychiatry. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2015;8(3):117–8.CrossRefPubMed Vieta E. Personalised medicine applied to mental health: Precision psychiatry. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2015;8(3):117–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bernard C. Introduction to Experimental Medicine. Chicago: McMillan and Co., Ltd.; 1827. Bernard C. Introduction to Experimental Medicine. Chicago: McMillan and Co., Ltd.; 1827.
7.
go back to reference Perlman RL, Govindaraju DR, Archibald E. Garrod: the father of precision medicine. Genet Med. 2016;18(11):1088–9.CrossRefPubMed Perlman RL, Govindaraju DR, Archibald E. Garrod: the father of precision medicine. Genet Med. 2016;18(11):1088–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Garrod AE. The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. 1902 [classical article]. Yale J Biol Med. 2002;75(4):221–31.PubMedPubMedCentral Garrod AE. The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. 1902 [classical article]. Yale J Biol Med. 2002;75(4):221–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th. Editionth ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1962. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th. Editionth ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1962.
10.
go back to reference Stephan KE, Bach DR, Fletcher PC, Flint J, Frank MJ, Friston KJ, Heinz A, Huys QJ, Owen MJ, Binder EB, et al. Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: classification and diagnosis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(1):77–83.CrossRefPubMed Stephan KE, Bach DR, Fletcher PC, Flint J, Frank MJ, Friston KJ, Heinz A, Huys QJ, Owen MJ, Binder EB, et al. Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: classification and diagnosis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(1):77–83.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fernandes BS, Gama CS, Kauer-Sant’Anna M, Lobato MI, Belmonte-de-Abreu P, Kapczinski F. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in bipolar and unipolar depression: a potential adjunctive tool for differential diagnosis. J Psychiatr Res. 2009;43(15):1200–4.CrossRefPubMed Fernandes BS, Gama CS, Kauer-Sant’Anna M, Lobato MI, Belmonte-de-Abreu P, Kapczinski F. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in bipolar and unipolar depression: a potential adjunctive tool for differential diagnosis. J Psychiatr Res. 2009;43(15):1200–4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Insel TR. The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: precision medicine for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(4):395–7.CrossRefPubMed Insel TR. The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: precision medicine for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(4):395–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Williams LM, Goldstein-Piekarski AN, Chowdhry N, Grisanzio KA, Haug NA, Samara Z, Etkin A, O’Hara R, Schatzberg AF, Suppes T, et al. Developing a clinical translational neuroscience taxonomy for anxiety and mood disorder: protocol for the baseline-follow up Research domain criteria Anxiety and Depression (“RAD”) project. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Williams LM, Goldstein-Piekarski AN, Chowdhry N, Grisanzio KA, Haug NA, Samara Z, Etkin A, O’Hara R, Schatzberg AF, Suppes T, et al. Developing a clinical translational neuroscience taxonomy for anxiety and mood disorder: protocol for the baseline-follow up Research domain criteria Anxiety and Depression (“RAD”) project. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
go back to reference Tretter F, Gebicke-Haerter PJ. Systems biology in psychiatric research: from complex data sets over wiring diagrams to computer simulations. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;829:567–92.CrossRefPubMed Tretter F, Gebicke-Haerter PJ. Systems biology in psychiatric research: from complex data sets over wiring diagrams to computer simulations. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;829:567–92.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(3):89–95.CrossRef Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(3):89–95.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Carvalho AF, Kohler CA, Brunoni AR, Miskowiak KW, Herrmann N, Lanctot KL, Hyphantis TN, Quevedo J, Fernandes BS, Berk M. Bias in peripheral depression biomarkers. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(2):81–90.CrossRefPubMed Carvalho AF, Kohler CA, Brunoni AR, Miskowiak KW, Herrmann N, Lanctot KL, Hyphantis TN, Quevedo J, Fernandes BS, Berk M. Bias in peripheral depression biomarkers. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(2):81–90.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Carvalho AF, Kohler CA, Fernandes BS, Quevedo J, Miskowiak KW, Brunoni AR, Machado-Vieira R, Maes M, Vieta E, Berk M. Bias in emerging biomarkers for bipolar disorder. Psychol Med. 2016;46(11):2287–97.CrossRefPubMed Carvalho AF, Kohler CA, Fernandes BS, Quevedo J, Miskowiak KW, Brunoni AR, Machado-Vieira R, Maes M, Vieta E, Berk M. Bias in emerging biomarkers for bipolar disorder. Psychol Med. 2016;46(11):2287–97.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Marzano L, Bardill A, Fields B, Herd K, Veale D, Grey N, Moran P. The application of mHealth to mental health: opportunities and challenges. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(10):942–8.CrossRefPubMed Marzano L, Bardill A, Fields B, Herd K, Veale D, Grey N, Moran P. The application of mHealth to mental health: opportunities and challenges. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(10):942–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Uher R, Tansey KE, Dew T, Maier W, Mors O, Hauser J, Dernovsek MZ, Henigsberg N, Souery D, Farmer A, et al. An inflammatory biomarker as a differential predictor of outcome of depression treatment with escitalopram and nortriptyline. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(12):1278–86.CrossRefPubMed Uher R, Tansey KE, Dew T, Maier W, Mors O, Hauser J, Dernovsek MZ, Henigsberg N, Souery D, Farmer A, et al. An inflammatory biomarker as a differential predictor of outcome of depression treatment with escitalopram and nortriptyline. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(12):1278–86.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Korgaonkar MS, Rekshan W, Gordon E, Rush AJ, Williams LM, Blasey C, Grieve SM. Magnetic resonance imaging measures of brain structure to predict antidepressant treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. EBioMed. 2015;2(1):37–45.CrossRef Korgaonkar MS, Rekshan W, Gordon E, Rush AJ, Williams LM, Blasey C, Grieve SM. Magnetic resonance imaging measures of brain structure to predict antidepressant treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. EBioMed. 2015;2(1):37–45.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miller S, McTeague LM, Gyurak A, Patenaude B, Williams LM, Grieve SM, Korgaonkar MS, Etkin A. Cognition-childhood maltreatment interactions in the prediction of antidepressant outcomes in major depressive disorder patients: results from the iSPOT-D trial. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32(8):594–604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller S, McTeague LM, Gyurak A, Patenaude B, Williams LM, Grieve SM, Korgaonkar MS, Etkin A. Cognition-childhood maltreatment interactions in the prediction of antidepressant outcomes in major depressive disorder patients: results from the iSPOT-D trial. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32(8):594–604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Cohen WA. Drucker on Leadership: New Lessons from the Father of Modern Management. New York: Wiley; 2009. Cohen WA. Drucker on Leadership: New Lessons from the Father of Modern Management. New York: Wiley; 2009.
29.
go back to reference Garraway LA, Verweij J, Ballman KV. Precision oncology: an overview. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15):1803–5.CrossRefPubMed Garraway LA, Verweij J, Ballman KV. Precision oncology: an overview. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15):1803–5.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Hood L, Friend SH. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(3):184–7.CrossRefPubMed Hood L, Friend SH. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(3):184–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Biomarkers on a roll. Nature Biotechnology. 2010;28(5):431. Biomarkers on a roll. Nature Biotechnology. 2010;28(5):431.
33.
go back to reference Goossens N, Nakagawa S, Sun X, Hoshida Y. Cancer biomarker discovery and validation. Transl Cancer Res. 2015;4(3):256–69.PubMedPubMedCentral Goossens N, Nakagawa S, Sun X, Hoshida Y. Cancer biomarker discovery and validation. Transl Cancer Res. 2015;4(3):256–69.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Chambers DA, Feero WG, Khoury MJ. Convergence of implementation science, precision medicine, and the learning health care system: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA. 2016;315(18):1941–2.CrossRefPubMed Chambers DA, Feero WG, Khoury MJ. Convergence of implementation science, precision medicine, and the learning health care system: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA. 2016;315(18):1941–2.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Fisher ES, Shortell SM, Savitz LA. Implementation science: a potential catalyst for delivery system reform. JAMA. 2016;315(4):339–40.CrossRefPubMed Fisher ES, Shortell SM, Savitz LA. Implementation science: a potential catalyst for delivery system reform. JAMA. 2016;315(4):339–40.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The new field of ‘precision psychiatry’
Authors
Brisa S. Fernandes
Leanne M. Williams
Johann Steiner
Marion Leboyer
André F. Carvalho
Michael Berk
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0849-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medicine 1/2017 Go to the issue