Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Protocol

The neuroscience of human empathy for pleasure: protocol for a scoping review

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Objective

The neuroscience of human empathy for pleasure and positive affect is an emergent, scarcely addressed topic. The main aim of this scoping review is to map the impact of this new research domain on the field of social and affective neuroscience.

Introduction

Most of the literature on empathy and affect sharing has hitherto focused on negative emotions, with a special focus on pain. However, understanding, sharing, and reacting to others’ pleasures is an evolutionarily and socially important function. Our scoping review addresses this gap in the literature and tries to unify the available information under the empathy for pleasure umbrella.

Inclusion criteria

This scoping review is intended to cover studies on empathy for positive emotions, pleasant sensory outcomes, and other rewards in healthy individuals and neurological/neuropsychiatric/neurodevelopmental disorders populations.

Methods

We will perform a systematic search in the Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases. Two authors will independently screen all titles, abstracts, and then full-text articles that meet the inclusion criteria. The year range of interest will be 2000–2022, and only journal articles published in English will be assessed. Data will be extracted and presented in tables and/or graphical representations to synthesize and describe the results. The extracted data will be reported in a comprehensive summary.

Results

The final manuscript is intended for submission to an indexed journal in late 2023/beginning 2024.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, the present scoping review will be the first to address the variety and heterogeneity of available evidence on human empathy for pleasure. We ultimately aim at perusing the growing literature on this far-reaching field of study and informing future research.

Systematic review registration

The neuroscience of human empathy for pleasure: Protocol for a scoping review. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W7H6J. (December 27, 2022).

Available only for authorised users

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef

Balconi M, Vanutelli ME. Competition in the brain. The contribution of EEG and fNIRS modulation and personality effects in social ranking. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1587.

Batson CD, Batson JG, Slingsby JK, Harrell KL, Peekna HM, Todd RM. Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(3):413.CrossRefPubMed

Betti V, Aglioti SM. Dynamic construction of the neural networks underpinning empathy for pain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;63:191–206.CrossRefPubMed

De Vignemont F, Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10(10):435–41.CrossRefPubMed

Decety J, Ickes W. The social neuroscience of empathy. Mit press; 2011.

Fallon N, Roberts C, Stancak A. Shared and distinct functional networks for empathy and pain processing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020;15(7):709–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lamm C, Silani G, Singer T. Distinct neural networks underlying empathy for pleasant and unpleasant touch. Cortex. 2015;70:79–89.CrossRefPubMed

Light SN, Coan JA, Zahn-Waxler C, Frye C, Goldsmith HH, Davidson RJ. Empathy is associated with dynamic change in prefrontal brain electrical activity during positive emotion in children. Child Dev. 2009;80(4):1210–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Light SN, Moran ZD, Swander L, Le V, Cage B, Burghy C, et al. Electromyographically assessed empathic concern and empathic happiness predict increased prosocial behavior in adults. Biol Psychol. 2015;104:116–29.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Mobbs D, Yu R, Meyer M, Passamonti L, Seymour B, Calder AJ, et al. A key role for similarity in vicarious reward. Science. 2009;324(5929):900–900.ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Morelli SA, Knutson B, Zaki J. Neural sensitivity to personal and vicarious reward differentially relate to prosociality and well-being. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018;13(8):831–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Morelli SA, Lieberman MD, Zaki J. The emerging study of positive empathy. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2015;9(2):57–68.CrossRef

14.

Morelli SA, Sacchet MD, Zaki J. Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: a quantitative meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2015;112:244–53.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Paradiso E, Gazzola V, Keysers C. Neural mechanisms necessary for empathy-related phenomena across species. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2021;68:107–15.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Peters MD, Marnie C, Colquhoun H, Garritty CM, Hempel S, Horsley T, et al. Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):1–6.CrossRef

17.

Peters MD, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–26.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Preston SD, De Waal FB. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci. 2002;25(1):1–20.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Rameson LT, Lieberman MD. Empathy: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2009;3(1):94–110.CrossRef

20.

Shu J, Hassell S, Weber J, Ochsner KN, Mobbs D. The role of empathy in experiencing vicarious anxiety. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017;146(8):1164.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Taiwo Z, Bezdek M, Mirabito G, Light SN. Empathy for joy recruits a broader prefrontal network than empathy for sadness and is predicted by executive functioning. Neuropsychology. 2021;35(1):90.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Telle NT, Pfister HR. Positive empathy and prosocial behavior: a neglected link. Emot Rev. 2016;8(2):154–63.CrossRef

23.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):1–10.CrossRef

Title: The neuroscience of human empathy for pleasure: protocol for a scoping review
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Published in: Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02481-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The neuroscience of human empathy for pleasure: protocol for a scoping review

Abstract

Objective

Introduction

Inclusion criteria

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Systematic review registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Introduction

Inclusion criteria

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Systematic review registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Searching for the social determinants of health: observations from evidence synthesis publications

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of ill health and health shocks on labour supply

Correction: Advancements in additive manufacturing for video laryngoscopes: a comprehensive scoping and technological review

Community mobilisation approaches to preventing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review

Catalysing global surgery: a meta-research study on factors affecting surgical research collaborations with Africa

Comparison of fish oil supplements and corn oil effects on serum lipid profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials