Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 8/2013

01-10-2013 | Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques

The little finger ulnar palmar digital artery perforator flap: anatomical basis

Authors: Francesca Toia, Marcella Marchese, Barbara Boniforti, Pierluigi Tos, Luca Delcroix

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore the cutaneous vascularization of the hypothenar region and investigate the anatomical basis for perforator propeller flaps for coverage of the flexor aspect of the little finger.

Methods

The area between the pisiform and the base of the little finger was studied in 14 hands of fresh cadavers injected with red latex. An oval flap 1.5 cm large was raised along the axis between these two points. Perforators going into the flap were dissected up to their origin from the ulnar palmar digital artery of the little finger, and their distance from the proximal edge of the A1 pulley was recorded.

Results

The mean number of perforator arteries entering the flap was 5.8 (range 4–8). A constant sizeable perforator was identified within 0.7 cm from the proximal margin of the A1 pulley in all 14 specimens. In the majority of cases (64 %), the most distal perforator was located at this level. Dissection of the flap was carried out suprafascially on the most distal perforator and 180° rotation allowed the flap to reach the flexor surface of the fifth finger. The donor site was closed primarily.

Conclusion

Distal perforators of the ulnar palmar digital artery of the little finger are constantly found. Our anatomical findings support the possibility of raising a propeller perforator flap from the hypothenar region for coverage of the flexor aspect of the little finger. Its clinical application could provide a quick and straightforward single-stage option with a negligible donor-site morbidity for reconstruction of such defects.
Literature
1.
Casoli V, Vérolino P, Pélissier P, Kostopoulos E, Caix P, Delmas V, Martin D, Baudet J (2004) The retrograde neurocutaneous island flap of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve: anatomical basis and clinical application. Surg Radiol Anat 26(1):8–13PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hwang K, Han JY, Chung IH (2005) Hypothenar flap based on a cutaneous perforator branch of the ulnar artery: an anatomic study. J Reconstr Microsurg 21(5):297–301PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kinoshita Y, Kojima T, Hirase Y, Kim H, Endo T (1991) Subcutaneous pedicle hypothenar island flap. Ann Plast Surg 27(6):519–526PubMedCrossRef
7.
Kojima T, Endo T, Fukumoto K (1990) Reverse vascular pedicle hypothenar island flap. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 22(3):137–144PubMed
8.
Morris SF, Miller BJ, Taylor GI (2006) Vascular anatomy of the integument. In: Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC (eds) Perforators flaps anatomy, technique and clinical applications, vol I. Quality Medical Publishing Inc., St. Louis, pp 11–36
9.
Nagoshi M, Hashizume H, Nishida K, Takagoshi H, Pu J, Inoue H (1997) Percutaneous release for trigger finger in idiopathic and hemodialysis patients. Acta Med Okayama 51:155–158PubMed
10.
Novelino F, Goncalves J, de l’Aulnoit SH, Schoofs M (2002) The fasciocutaneous hypothenar flap: preliminary anatomical and clinical study. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 47(1):9–11PubMedCrossRef
11.
Omokawa S, Yajima H, Inada Y, Fukui A, Tamai S (2010) A reverse ulnar hypothenar flap for finger reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(4):828–833
12.
Omokawa S, Ryu J, Tang JB, Han JS (1996) Anatomical basis for a fasciocutaneous flap from the hypothenar eminence of the hand. Br J Plast Surg 49(8):559–563PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
15.
Plancher KD, Idler RS, Lourie GM, Strickland JW (1996) Recalcitrant carpal tunnel. The hypothenar fat pad flap. Hand Clin 12(2):337–349PubMed
16.
Uchida R, Matsumura H, Imai R, Tanaka K, Watanabe K (2009) Anatomical study of the perforators from the ulnar palmar digital artery of the little finger and clinical uses of digital artery perforator flaps. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43(2):90–93. doi:10.​1080/​0284431080255697​6 PubMedCrossRef
17.
Wilhelmi BJ, Snyder N, Verbesey JE, Ganchi PA, Lee WPA (2001) Trigger finger release with hand surface landmark ratios: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:908–915PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The little finger ulnar palmar digital artery perforator flap: anatomical basis
Authors
Francesca Toia
Marcella Marchese
Barbara Boniforti
Pierluigi Tos
Luca Delcroix
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1091-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 8/2013 Go to the issue

Anatomic Variations

Duplicate origin of the posterior communicating artery diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography

Review

Poland syndrome: from embryological basis to plastic surgery

Original Article

Variations of the radial recurrent artery of clinical interest

Book Review

Part of abstracts of communications presented during the European Joint Congress of Clinical Anatomy in Lisbon, 26th–29th June 2013

Anatomic Variations

Horseshoe adrenal gland: a rare congenital anomaly

Original Article

Cross-sectional study of the neural ossification centers of vertebrae C1–S5 in the human fetus