Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Neurophthalmology

The interaction of pupil response with the vergence system

Authors: Moritz Feil, Barbara Moser, Mathias Abegg

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

A gaze shift from a target at distance to a target at near leads to pupillary constriction. The regulation of this pupillary near response is ill known. We investigated the impact of accommodation, convergence, and proximity on the pupillary diameter.

Methods

We recorded pupil size and vergence eye movements with the use of an infrared eye tracker. We determined the pupillary response in four conditions: (1) after a gaze shift from far to near without accommodation, (2) after a gaze shift from far to near with neither accommodation nor convergence, (3) after accommodation alone, and (4) after accommodation with convergence without a gaze shift to near. These responses were compared to the pupil response of a full near response and to a gaze shift from one far target to another.

Results

We found a reliable pupillary near response. The removal of both accommodation and convergence in gaze shift from far to near abolished the pupillary near response. Accommodation alone did not induce pupillary constriction, while convergence and accommodation together induced a pupil response similar to the full near response.

Conclusions

The main trigger for the pupillary response seems to be convergence. Neither accommodation nor proximity alone induce a significant pupillary constriction. This suggests that the miosis of the near triad is closely coupled to the vergence system rather than being independently regulated.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Semmlow J, Wetzel P (1979) Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence. J Opt Soc Am 69:639–645CrossRefPubMed Semmlow J, Wetzel P (1979) Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence. J Opt Soc Am 69:639–645CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Phillips S, Stark L (1977) Blur: a sufficient accommodative stimulus. Doc Ophthalmol Adv Ophthalmol 43:65–89CrossRef Phillips S, Stark L (1977) Blur: a sufficient accommodative stimulus. Doc Ophthalmol Adv Ophthalmol 43:65–89CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hess EH, Polt JM (1960) Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 132:349–350CrossRefPubMed Hess EH, Polt JM (1960) Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 132:349–350CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Marg E, Morgan MW (1949) The pupillary near reflex; the relation of pupillary diameter to accommodation and the various components of convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 26:183–198CrossRefPubMed Marg E, Morgan MW (1949) The pupillary near reflex; the relation of pupillary diameter to accommodation and the various components of convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 26:183–198CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marg E, Morgan MW (1950) Further investigation of the pupillary near reflex; the effect of accommodation, fusional convergence and the proximity factor on pupillary diameter. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 27:217–225CrossRefPubMed Marg E, Morgan MW (1950) Further investigation of the pupillary near reflex; the effect of accommodation, fusional convergence and the proximity factor on pupillary diameter. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 27:217–225CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Phillips NJ, Winn B, Gilmartin B (1992) Absence of pupil response to blur-driven accommodation. Vis Res 32:1775–1779CrossRefPubMed Phillips NJ, Winn B, Gilmartin B (1992) Absence of pupil response to blur-driven accommodation. Vis Res 32:1775–1779CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Backer WD, Ogle KN (1964) Pupillary response to fusional eye movements. Am J Ophthalmol 58:743–756CrossRefPubMed Backer WD, Ogle KN (1964) Pupillary response to fusional eye movements. Am J Ophthalmol 58:743–756CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wilhelm H (2011) Chapter 16 - Disorders of the pupil. In: Leigh CK and RJ (ed) Handb. Clin. Neurol. Elsevier, pp 427–466 Wilhelm H (2011) Chapter 16 - Disorders of the pupil. In: Leigh CK and RJ (ed) Handb. Clin. Neurol. Elsevier, pp 427–466
13.
go back to reference Knoll HA (1949) Pupillary changes associated with accommodation and convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 26:346–357CrossRefPubMed Knoll HA (1949) Pupillary changes associated with accommodation and convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 26:346–357CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Myers GA, Stark L (1990) Topology of the near response triad. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 10:175–181CrossRef Myers GA, Stark L (1990) Topology of the near response triad. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 10:175–181CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Renard G, Massonnet-Naux (1951) Pupillary synergy to convergence. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Générale Ophtalmol 11:137–145 Renard G, Massonnet-Naux (1951) Pupillary synergy to convergence. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Générale Ophtalmol 11:137–145
16.
go back to reference Tsuchiya K, Ukai K, Ishikawa S (1988) Concurrent recording of accommodative and pupillary responses elicited by quasi-static accommodative stimulation. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 92:336–343PubMed Tsuchiya K, Ukai K, Ishikawa S (1988) Concurrent recording of accommodative and pupillary responses elicited by quasi-static accommodative stimulation. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 92:336–343PubMed
17.
go back to reference Schor CM, Alexander J, Cormack L, Stevenson S (1992) Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 12:307–318CrossRef Schor CM, Alexander J, Cormack L, Stevenson S (1992) Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 12:307–318CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Horn AK, Eberhorn A, Härtig W et al (2008) Perioculomotor cell groups in monkey and man defined by their histochemical and functional properties: reappraisal of the Edinger–Westphal nucleus. J Comp Neurol 507:1317–1335. doi:10.1002/cne.21598 CrossRefPubMed Horn AK, Eberhorn A, Härtig W et al (2008) Perioculomotor cell groups in monkey and man defined by their histochemical and functional properties: reappraisal of the Edinger–Westphal nucleus. J Comp Neurol 507:1317–1335. doi:10.​1002/​cne.​21598 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Büttner-Ennever JA, Horn AK, Scherberger H, D’Ascanio P (2001) Motoneurons of twitch and nontwitch extraocular muscle fibers in the abducens, trochlear, and oculomotor nuclei of monkeys. J Comp Neurol 438:318–335CrossRefPubMed Büttner-Ennever JA, Horn AK, Scherberger H, D’Ascanio P (2001) Motoneurons of twitch and nontwitch extraocular muscle fibers in the abducens, trochlear, and oculomotor nuclei of monkeys. J Comp Neurol 438:318–335CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The interaction of pupil response with the vergence system
Authors
Moritz Feil
Barbara Moser
Mathias Abegg
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3770-2

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2017 Go to the issue