Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2006

01-04-2006

The Influence of Technical Complications on Postoperative Outcome and Survival After Esophagectomy

Authors: Lorenzo E. Ferri, MD, FRCS (C), Simon Law, MS, MA (Cantab), MBBChir, FRCS (Edin), FACS, Kam-Ho Wong, MBBS, FRCS (Edin), Ka-Fai Kwok, MBBS, FRCS (Edin), John Wong, MD, PhD, FRACS, FACS (Hon)

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The dismal survival associated with esophagectomy for cancer has led to the search for potentially correctable factors responsible for this poor prognosis. Although it is intuitive that technical complications could increase postoperative mortality, the effect on long-term survival is controversial.

Methods

From 1990 to 2002, 434 patients underwent resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus. Prospectively collected data were reviewed for the presence of technical complications. Patient, tumor, and operative variables, postoperative outcome, and survival were compared between patients with technical complications and those without. Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis.

Results

Technical complications occurred in 98 (22.6%) patients. Patients with technical complications had a higher prevalence of cardiac disease, more proximal tumors, and more cervical anastomoses. Technical complications were associated with an increased rate of pulmonary complications (37.8% vs. 10.7%; P < .001) and increased hospital mortality (9.2% vs. 3.3%; P = .025), but no difference in 30-day mortality (2% vs. 1.2%; P = .6). Poor-prognostic factors for survival included male sex, stage III/IV disease, cirrhosis, proximal tumors, and R1/R2 resection, but not technical complications.

Conclusions

Although immediate postoperative outcome and hospital mortality rates were increased, no effect on long-term survival was seen in patients with complications related to errors in surgical technique.
Literature
1.
Millikan KW, Silverstein J, Hart V, et al. A 15-year review of esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia. Arch Surg 1995;130:617–24PubMed
2.
Ellis FH Jr, Heatley GJ, Krasna MJ, Williamson WA, Balogh K. Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteria. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:836–46; discussion 846–8PubMed
3.
Thomas P, Doddoli C, Lienne P, et al. Changing patterns and surgical results in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 1997;84:119–25CrossRefPubMed
4.
Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR. Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Ann Surg 2001;234:520–30; discussion 530–1CrossRefPubMed
5.
Law S, Kwong DL, Kwok KF, et al. Improvement in treatment results and long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer: impact of chemoradiation and change in treatment strategy. Ann Surg 2003;238:339–47; discussion 347–8PubMed
6.
Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 2000;232:225–32PubMed
7.
Martin RK, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002;235:803–13CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:840–4PubMed
9.
Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, Alexandrou A, Wong J. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg 2001;233:338–44PubMed
10.
Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, et al. The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:42–50CrossRefPubMed
11.
Hirai T, Yamashita Y, Mukaida H, Kuwahara M, Inoue H, Toge T. Poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients with postoperative complications. Surg Today 1998;28:576–9CrossRefPubMed
12.
Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Bartels H, Fink U. Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world. Ann Surg 2001;234:360–7; discussion 368–9CrossRefPubMed
13.
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392–400; discussion 400–3CrossRefPubMed
14.
Law S, Wong J. Two-field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2001; 14:98–103CrossRefPubMed
15.
Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M, Wong J. A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1997;174:320–4CrossRefPubMed
16.
Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery 1997;122:8–14CrossRefPubMed
17.
Law SY, Fok M, Wei WI, et al. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:418–22CrossRefPubMed
18.
Law SY, Fok M, Wong J. Pattern of recurrence after oesophageal resection for cancer: clinical implications. Br J Surg 1996;83:107–11PubMed
19.
Law S, Wong J. Does lymphadenectomy add anything to the treatment of esophageal cancer? Adv Surg 1999;33:311–27PubMed
20.
Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 1997;226:169–73CrossRefPubMed
21.
Law S, Fok M, Chow S, Chu KM, Wong J. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:210–7PubMed
22.
van Sandick JW, van Lanschot JJ, ten Kate FJ, Tijssen JG, Obertop H. Indicators of prognosis after transhiatal esophageal resection without thoracotomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:28–36PubMed
23.
Fok M, Law S, Stipa F, Cheng S, Wong J. A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy 1993;25:660–3PubMed
24.
Johnson PR, Kanegoanker GS, Bates T. Indirect laryngoscopic evaluation of vocal cord function in patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:605–8PubMed
25.
Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM, et al. Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2002;236:376–84; discussion 384–5CrossRefPubMed
26.
Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, Baker S, Coppola D. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:635–43CrossRefPubMed
27.
Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak—a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 1992;49:163–7PubMed
28.
Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, Von Holstein CS, Zilling T. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg 2003;238:803–12; discussion 812–4PubMed
29.
Imdahl A, Schoffel U, Ruf G. Impact of neoadjuvant therapy of perioperative morbidity in patients with esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 2004;187:64–8CrossRefPubMed
30.
Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1997;337:161–7CrossRefPubMed
31.
Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, Devriese PP, van Lanschot JJ, Obertop H. Vocal cord paralysis after subtotal oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1999;86:1583–7CrossRefPubMed
32.
Vigneswaran WT, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Deschamps C, Daly RC, Allen MS. Extended esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma of the upper thoracic esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:901–6; discussion 906–7PubMed
33.
Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, Yamaguchi H, Ishikawa T, Kagami Y. Thoracic esophageal carcinoma above the carina: a more formidable adversary? J Surg Oncol 1997;65:28–33CrossRefPubMed
34.
Wichmann MW, Muller C, Hornung HM, Lau-Werner U, Schildberg FW. Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88:1092–8CrossRefPubMed
35.
McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Male gender adversely affects survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2003;90:711–5CrossRefPubMed
36.
Alexiou C, Onyeaka CV, Beggs D, et al. Do women live longer following lung resection for carcinoma? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:319–25CrossRefPubMed
37.
Micheli A, Mariotto A, Giorgi Rossi A, Gatta G, Muti P. The prognostic role of gender in survival of adult cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:2271–8CrossRef
38.
Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Holmberg L, Klareskog L, Persson I, Ponten J. The effect of female sex hormones on cancer survival. A register-based study in patients younger than 20 years at diagnosis. JAMA 1990;263:2189–93CrossRefPubMed
39.
Badwe RA, Patil PK, Bhansali MS, Mistry RC, Juvekar RR, Desai PB. Impact of age and sex on survival after curative resection for carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 1994;74:2425–9PubMed
40.
Laurent C, Sa Cunha A, Couderc P, Rullier E, Saric J. Influence of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 2003;90:1131–6CrossRefPubMed
41.
Fujita S, Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kodaira S, Kitajima M. Anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence and poor prognosis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1993;23:299–302PubMed
42.
de Melo GM, Ribeiro KC, Kowalski LP, Deheinzelin D. Risk factors for postoperative complications in oral cancer and their prognostic implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:828–33PubMed
43.
Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:181–8CrossRefPubMed
44.
Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw AL, Finlayson SR, Grove MR, Tosteson AN. Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;126:178–83PubMed
45.
Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117–27CrossRefPubMed
46.
Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747–51CrossRefPubMed
47.
van Lanschot JJ, Hulscher JB, Buskens CJ, Tilanus HW, ten Kate FJ, Obertop H. Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy. Cancer 2001;91:1574–8PubMed
Metadata
Title
The Influence of Technical Complications on Postoperative Outcome and Survival After Esophagectomy
Authors
Lorenzo E. Ferri, MD, FRCS (C)
Simon Law, MS, MA (Cantab), MBBChir, FRCS (Edin), FACS
Kam-Ho Wong, MBBS, FRCS (Edin)
Ka-Fai Kwok, MBBS, FRCS (Edin)
John Wong, MD, PhD, FRACS, FACS (Hon)
Publication date
01-04-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.04.040

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2006 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Axillary Ultrasonography to Detect Recurrence After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

OriginalPaper

The Prognostic Effect of the Number of Histologically Examined Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Stage Migration or Age Association?

Educational Review

Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Biology, Pathogenesis, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment Approaches

OriginalPaper

Accuracy of Preoperative Imaging of Hepatic Tumors With Helical Computed Tomography

OriginalPaper

Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Determining Axillary Status and Treatment Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Editorial

Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Melanoma Staging: Refining the Indications