Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 12/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Paper

The influence of cementing technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the initial stability of the femoral component

Authors: Rudi G. Bitsch, Sebastian Jäger, Marcus Lürssen, Travis Loidolt, Thomas P. Schmalzried, Stefan Weiss

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 12/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In clinical and retrieval analyses, over-penetration of cement, incomplete seating of the prosthesis with a resultant polar cement mass, or both, have been associated with early femoral failures of resurfacing arthroplasties. We used human bone specimens to experimentally compare the initial stability of different cementing techniques.

Methods

Twenty-six pairs of fresh frozen femora were prepared for resurfacing using original instruments (DePuy ASR). ASR femoral resurfacing prostheses were implanted using two different cementing techniques: (1) component filling and (2) cement applicator. Real-time measurements of pressure and temperature during implantation, analyses of cement penetration and micro motions under torque application were performed.

Results

Applicator use reduced significantly the cement penetration depth (9.2 mm vs 5.3 mm with the applicator, p = 0.001), polar mantle (8.1 mm vs 2.6 mm, p = 0.008), cement defects (3.7 mm vs 0.1 mm, p = 0.008) and interface temperatures (40.3°C vs 33.1°C, p < 0.001 ). Initial rotational stability showed statistically significant less extreme values with the cement applicator technique (range 3.4–51.7 m°/Nm, 11.0–29.7 m°/Nm, p = 0.024).

Conclusions

The cement applicator technique significantly reduces cement defects, incomplete seating, over-penetration and interface temperatures with a more consistent initial stability of the ASR femoral resurfacing prostheses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gill HS, Campbell PA, Murray DW, De Smet KA (2007) Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(1):16PubMedCrossRef Gill HS, Campbell PA, Murray DW, De Smet KA (2007) Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(1):16PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bitsch RG, Loidolt T, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP (2010) Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: in vitro study of pressure and temperature. J Arthroplasty 26(1):144–151 Bitsch RG, Loidolt T, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP (2010) Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: in vitro study of pressure and temperature. J Arthroplasty 26(1):144–151
3.
go back to reference Bitsch RG, Jager S, Lurssen M, Loidolt T, Schmalzried TP, Clarius M (2010) Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components. J Orthop Res 28(8):986–991 Bitsch RG, Jager S, Lurssen M, Loidolt T, Schmalzried TP, Clarius M (2010) Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components. J Orthop Res 28(8):986–991
4.
go back to reference Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzried TP (2007) Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 25(4):423PubMedCrossRef Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzried TP (2007) Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 25(4):423PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Little JP, Gray HA, Murray DW, Beard DJ, Gill HS (2008) Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 23(3):454PubMedCrossRef Little JP, Gray HA, Murray DW, Beard DJ, Gill HS (2008) Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 23(3):454PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Matar WY, Poitras P, Smit K, May O (2009) 2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):84PubMedCrossRef Beaule PE, Matar WY, Poitras P, Smit K, May O (2009) 2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):84PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Scheerlinck T, Delport H, Kiewitt T (2010) Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(2):375PubMedCrossRef Scheerlinck T, Delport H, Kiewitt T (2010) Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(2):375PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Falez F, Favetti F, Casella F, Papalia M, Panegrossi G (2010) Patterns of cement distribution in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(7):1162PubMedCrossRef Falez F, Favetti F, Casella F, Papalia M, Panegrossi G (2010) Patterns of cement distribution in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(7):1162PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Halawa M, Lee AJ, Ling RS, Vangala SS (1978) The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 92(1):19PubMedCrossRef Halawa M, Lee AJ, Ling RS, Vangala SS (1978) The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 92(1):19PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Albrektsson T, Linder L (1984) Bone injury caused by curing bone cement. A vital microscopic study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res(183):280 Albrektsson T, Linder L (1984) Bone injury caused by curing bone cement. A vital microscopic study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res(183):280
11.
go back to reference Sih GC, Connelly GM, Berman AT (1980) The effect of thickness and pressure on the curing of PMMA bone cement for the total hip joint replacement. J Biomech 13(4):347PubMedCrossRef Sih GC, Connelly GM, Berman AT (1980) The effect of thickness and pressure on the curing of PMMA bone cement for the total hip joint replacement. J Biomech 13(4):347PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O'Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH (1997) In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(5):707PubMed Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O'Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH (1997) In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(5):707PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res(208):108 Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res(208):108
14.
go back to reference Ducheyne P, de MP, Aernoudt E (1977) Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 11(6):811PubMedCrossRef Ducheyne P, de MP, Aernoudt E (1977) Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 11(6):811PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gortz W, Nagerl UV, Nagerl H, Thomsen M (2002) Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads. J Biomech Eng 124(6):706PubMedCrossRef Gortz W, Nagerl UV, Nagerl H, Thomsen M (2002) Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads. J Biomech Eng 124(6):706PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C (2010) Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop [Epub ahead of print] McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C (2010) Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop [Epub ahead of print]
17.
go back to reference Falez F, Favetti F, Casella F, Panegrossi G (2008) Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases. Int Orthop 32(2):209PubMedCrossRef Falez F, Favetti F, Casella F, Panegrossi G (2008) Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases. Int Orthop 32(2):209PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morlock MM, Bishop N, Zustin J, Hahn M, Ruther W, Amling M (2008) Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3:89CrossRef Morlock MM, Bishop N, Zustin J, Hahn M, Ruther W, Amling M (2008) Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3:89CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ma SM, Kabo JM, Amstutz HC (1983) Frictional torque in surface and conventional hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(3):366PubMed Ma SM, Kabo JM, Amstutz HC (1983) Frictional torque in surface and conventional hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(3):366PubMed
Metadata
Title
The influence of cementing technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the initial stability of the femoral component
Authors
Rudi G. Bitsch
Sebastian Jäger
Marcus Lürssen
Travis Loidolt
Thomas P. Schmalzried
Stefan Weiss
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1212-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2011

International Orthopaedics 12/2011 Go to the issue