Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 3/2011

01-06-2011 | Case Report

The importance of pharmacokinetic consultation of cefepime treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a case report of severe thermal burn injury

Authors: Yosuke Aoki, Toshiharu Urakami, Hiroki Magarifuchi, Zenzo Nagasawa, Masaki Nagata, Mami Fukuoka

Published in: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The patient is a 54-year-old man with severe thermal burn injury involving 45.5% of the total body-surface area, complicated with bacteremia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a cefepime MIC of 8 µg/ml. The plasma concentrations of cefepime 1 g every 6 h measured by validated high performance liquid chromatography were 25.8 µg/ml at 1 h and 6.28 µg/ml at 5 h after infusion, and 3.9 µg/ml before the infusion, when creatinine clearance was increased to 136 ml/min by vigorous fluid replacement. The pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analyses in the one-compartment model with use of the Sawchuk–Zaske method revealed marked increase in the volume of distribution (28.9 l), total clearance (10.7 l/h), and shortening of plasma half- life (1.79 h) of cefepime, with time >MIC and 24-h area under the concentration–time-curve being 58% and 358, respectively. These pharmacokinetic parameters of cefepime quantified in the patient estimated a time >MIC of 87% if administered every 4 h. P. aeruginosa, however, was successfully eradicated without revision of the dosing regimen of cefepime. Decrease in creatinine clearance by correction of the fluid imbalance and wound closure by skin graft surgery likely contributed to the restoration of fluid shift, resulting in normal disposition of cefepime and favorable clinical outcome of the patient.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1–10.PubMedCrossRef Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1–10.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Drusano GL. Prevention of resistance: a goal for dose selection for antimicrobial agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(suppl 1):S42–50.PubMedCrossRef Drusano GL. Prevention of resistance: a goal for dose selection for antimicrobial agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(suppl 1):S42–50.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Crandon JL, Bulik CC, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Clinical pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1111–6.PubMedCrossRef Crandon JL, Bulik CC, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Clinical pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1111–6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mikamo H. Investigation on optimal regimen of ceftazidime against infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa using Monte Carlo simulation. Jpn J Antibiot. 2007;60:387–93.PubMed Mikamo H. Investigation on optimal regimen of ceftazidime against infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa using Monte Carlo simulation. Jpn J Antibiot. 2007;60:387–93.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Endimiani A, Perez F, Bonomo RA. Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:805–24.PubMedCrossRef Endimiani A, Perez F, Bonomo RA. Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:805–24.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bonapace CR, White RL, Friedrich LV, Norcross ED, Bosso JA. Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with thermal burn injury. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2848–54.PubMed Bonapace CR, White RL, Friedrich LV, Norcross ED, Bosso JA. Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with thermal burn injury. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2848–54.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sampol E, Jacquet A, Viggiano M, Bernini V, Manelli JC, Lacarello B, et al. Plasma, urine and skin pharmacokinetics of cefepime in burns patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46:315–7.PubMedCrossRef Sampol E, Jacquet A, Viggiano M, Bernini V, Manelli JC, Lacarello B, et al. Plasma, urine and skin pharmacokinetics of cefepime in burns patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46:315–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Conil JM, Geroges B, Lavit M, Seguin T, Samii K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and cefepime in burn patients: the importance of age and creatinine clearance. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;45:529–38.PubMed Conil JM, Geroges B, Lavit M, Seguin T, Samii K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and cefepime in burn patients: the importance of age and creatinine clearance. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;45:529–38.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bourget P, Lesne-Hullin A, Le Reveillé R, Le Bever H, Carsin H. Clinical pharmacokinetics of piperacillin–tazobactam combination in patients with major burns and signs of infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:139–45.PubMed Bourget P, Lesne-Hullin A, Le Reveillé R, Le Bever H, Carsin H. Clinical pharmacokinetics of piperacillin–tazobactam combination in patients with major burns and signs of infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:139–45.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Boucher BA, Hickerson WL, Kuhl DA, Bombassaro AM, Jaresko GS. Imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with burns. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990;48:130–7.PubMedCrossRef Boucher BA, Hickerson WL, Kuhl DA, Bombassaro AM, Jaresko GS. Imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with burns. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990;48:130–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Friedrich LV, White RL, Kays MB, Brundage DM, Yarbrough D III. Aztreonam pharmacokinetics in burn patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:57–61.PubMed Friedrich LV, White RL, Kays MB, Brundage DM, Yarbrough D III. Aztreonam pharmacokinetics in burn patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:57–61.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Agnihotri N, Gupta V, Joshi RM. Aerobic bacterial isolates from burn wound infections and their antibiograms––a five year study. Burns. 2004;30:241–3.PubMedCrossRef Agnihotri N, Gupta V, Joshi RM. Aerobic bacterial isolates from burn wound infections and their antibiograms––a five year study. Burns. 2004;30:241–3.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Branski LK, Al-Mousawi A, Rivero H, Jeschke MG, Sanford AP, Herndon DN. Emerging infections in burns. Surg Infect. 2009;10:389–97.CrossRef Branski LK, Al-Mousawi A, Rivero H, Jeschke MG, Sanford AP, Herndon DN. Emerging infections in burns. Surg Infect. 2009;10:389–97.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.
15.
go back to reference Isla A, Arzuaga A, Maynar J, Gascón AR, Solinis MA, Corral E, et al. Determination of ceftazidime and cefepime in plasma and dialysate-ultrafiltrate from patients undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration by HPLC. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;39:996–1005.PubMedCrossRef Isla A, Arzuaga A, Maynar J, Gascón AR, Solinis MA, Corral E, et al. Determination of ceftazidime and cefepime in plasma and dialysate-ultrafiltrate from patients undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration by HPLC. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;39:996–1005.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sawchuk RJ, Zaske DE. Pharmacokinetics of dosing regimens which utilize multiple intravenous infusions: gentamicin in burn patients. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1976;4:183–95.PubMedCrossRef Sawchuk RJ, Zaske DE. Pharmacokinetics of dosing regimens which utilize multiple intravenous infusions: gentamicin in burn patients. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1976;4:183–95.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Barbhaiya RH, Forgue ST, Gleason CR, Knupp CA, Pittman KA, Weidler DJ, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefepime after administration of single intravenous doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1118–22.PubMed Barbhaiya RH, Forgue ST, Gleason CR, Knupp CA, Pittman KA, Weidler DJ, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefepime after administration of single intravenous doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1118–22.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Barbhaiya RH, Forgue ST, Gleason CR, Knupp CA, Pittman KA, Weidler DJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefepime after single and multiple intravenous administrations in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:552–7.PubMed Barbhaiya RH, Forgue ST, Gleason CR, Knupp CA, Pittman KA, Weidler DJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefepime after single and multiple intravenous administrations in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:552–7.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Livornese LL, Slavin D, Benz RL, Ingerman MJ, Santoro J. Use of antibacterial agents in renal failure. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2001;15:983–1002.PubMedCrossRef Livornese LL, Slavin D, Benz RL, Ingerman MJ, Santoro J. Use of antibacterial agents in renal failure. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2001;15:983–1002.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Andes DR, Craig WA. Cephalosporins. In: Mandell GR, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 323–39. Andes DR, Craig WA. Cephalosporins. In: Mandell GR, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 323–39.
21.
go back to reference Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.PubMedCrossRef Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ryback M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R, Craig W, Billeter M, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.CrossRef Ryback M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R, Craig W, Billeter M, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sharma BR. Infections in patients with severe burns: causes and prevention thereof. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2007;21:745–59.PubMedCrossRef Sharma BR. Infections in patients with severe burns: causes and prevention thereof. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2007;21:745–59.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–929.PubMedCrossRef Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–929.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bhat SV, Peleg AY, Lodise TP, Shutt KA, Capitano B, Potoski BA, et al. Failure of current cefepime breakpoints to predict clinical outcomes of bacteremia caused by gram-negative organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:4390–5.PubMedCrossRef Bhat SV, Peleg AY, Lodise TP, Shutt KA, Capitano B, Potoski BA, et al. Failure of current cefepime breakpoints to predict clinical outcomes of bacteremia caused by gram-negative organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:4390–5.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference McKinnon PS, Paladino JA, Schentag JJ. Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31:345–51.PubMedCrossRef McKinnon PS, Paladino JA, Schentag JJ. Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31:345–51.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Roos JF, Bulitta J, Lipman J, Kirkpatrick CMJ. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic rationale for cefepime dosing regimens in intensive care units. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58:987–93.PubMedCrossRef Roos JF, Bulitta J, Lipman J, Kirkpatrick CMJ. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic rationale for cefepime dosing regimens in intensive care units. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58:987–93.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The importance of pharmacokinetic consultation of cefepime treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a case report of severe thermal burn injury
Authors
Yosuke Aoki
Toshiharu Urakami
Hiroki Magarifuchi
Zenzo Nagasawa
Masaki Nagata
Mami Fukuoka
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1341-321X
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7780
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-010-0119-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 3/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine