Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2017

Open Access 01-11-2017 | Original Article

The impact of the national bowel screening program in the Netherlands on detection and treatment of endoscopically unresectable benign polyps

Authors: C. C. M. Marres, C. J. Buskens, E. Schriever, P. C. M. Verbeek, M. W. Mundt, W. A. Bemelman, A. W. H. van de Ven

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In January 2014, a national bowel cancer screening program started in the Netherlands. The program is being implemented in phases until 2019. Due to this program, an increase in patients referred for a colorectal resection for benign, but endoscopically unresectable polyps, is expected. So far, most resections are performed according to oncological principles despite no pre-operative histological diagnosis of malignancy. The aim of this study was to analyze the increase in referred patients during the first year of the screening program and to compare pathological results and clinical outcome of resections of patients undergoing resection for benign polyps before and after implementation of screening.

Methods

Patients referred for colorectal resection without biopsy-proven cancer between January 2009 and January December 2014 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with endoscopically macroscopic features of carcinoma were excluded.

Results

Seventy-six patients were included. Forty-seven patients (61.8%) were operated on in the 5 years prior to implementation of the screening program, and 29 patients (38.2%) were operated during the first year of implementation of the screening program. The overall malignancy rate before the introduction of the program was 14.1 and 6.6% after it had started (p = .469). All resections were performed laparoscopically; the conversion rate was 3.9% (n = 3). The overall mortality rate was 2.7% (n = 2), major complications (Clavien–Dindo > 3b) occurred in 11.8% (n = 9) of patients. The anastomotic leakage rate was 3.9% (n = 3).

Conclusions

The number of patients referred for benign polyps tripled after introduction of the screening program. With an overall major morbidity and mortality rate of 11.8%, it seems valid to discuss whether an endoscopic excision with advanced techniques with or without laparoscopic assistance would be preferable in this patient group, accepting a 6.6% reoperation rate for additional oncological resection with lymph node sampling in patients in whom a malignancy is found on histological analysis of the complete polyp.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The national polyp study workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The national polyp study workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Logan RFA, Patnick J, Nickerson C et al (2012) Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut 61(10):1439–1446CrossRefPubMed Logan RFA, Patnick J, Nickerson C et al (2012) Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut 61(10):1439–1446CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Longo WE, Vorgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91CrossRefPubMed Longo WE, Vorgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Brigic A, Cahill RA, Bassett P, Clark SK, Kennedy RH (2014) A prospective case controlled study of the short term outcome following hemicolectomy for benign compared with malignant colonic polyps. Colorectal Dis 16(3):179–185CrossRefPubMed Brigic A, Cahill RA, Bassett P, Clark SK, Kennedy RH (2014) A prospective case controlled study of the short term outcome following hemicolectomy for benign compared with malignant colonic polyps. Colorectal Dis 16(3):179–185CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Lee TJ, Pascall G, Wood T et al (2009) Colonic polyps are different in the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme population compared to the symptomatic population. Gastrointest Endosc 69(AB290–1):3 Lee TJ, Pascall G, Wood T et al (2009) Colonic polyps are different in the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme population compared to the symptomatic population. Gastrointest Endosc 69(AB290–1):3
10.
go back to reference Harrow P, Nayagam S, Stafford N et al (2001) A comparison of incidence of colorectal cancer and polyps in Bowel Cancer Screening Programme patients with symptomatic patients referred under 2 week wait in a demographically matched population. Gut 60:A114CrossRef Harrow P, Nayagam S, Stafford N et al (2001) A comparison of incidence of colorectal cancer and polyps in Bowel Cancer Screening Programme patients with symptomatic patients referred under 2 week wait in a demographically matched population. Gut 60:A114CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, Yamano H, Kusaka H, Watanabe H (1996) Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44:8–14CrossRefPubMed Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, Yamano H, Kusaka H, Watanabe H (1996) Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44:8–14CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H et al (2016) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 4(10):E1030–E1044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H et al (2016) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 4(10):E1030–E1044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bertelson NL, Kalkbrenner KA, Merchea A et al (2012) Colectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: how often is it cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 55(11):1111–1116CrossRefPubMed Bertelson NL, Kalkbrenner KA, Merchea A et al (2012) Colectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: how often is it cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 55(11):1111–1116CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Loungnarath R, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Fleshman JW (2010) laparoscopic colectomy using cancer principles is appropriate for colonoscopically unresectable adenomas of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1017–1022CrossRefPubMed Loungnarath R, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Fleshman JW (2010) laparoscopic colectomy using cancer principles is appropriate for colonoscopically unresectable adenomas of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1017–1022CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hauenschild L, Bader FG, Laubert T et al (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(7):755–759CrossRefPubMed Hauenschild L, Bader FG, Laubert T et al (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(7):755–759CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Benedix F, Köckerling F, Lippert H, Scheidbach H (2008) Laparoscopic resection for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps: analysis of 525 patients. Surg Endosc 22(12):2576–2582CrossRefPubMed Benedix F, Köckerling F, Lippert H, Scheidbach H (2008) Laparoscopic resection for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps: analysis of 525 patients. Surg Endosc 22(12):2576–2582CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Zmora O, Benjamin B, Reshef A et al (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy for colonic polyps. Surg Endosc 23(3):629–632CrossRefPubMed Zmora O, Benjamin B, Reshef A et al (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy for colonic polyps. Surg Endosc 23(3):629–632CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brozovich M, Read TE, Salgado J, Akbari RP, McCormick JT, Caushaj PF (2008) Laparoscopic colectomy for apparently benign colorectal neoplasia: a word of caution. Surg Endosc 22(2):506–509CrossRefPubMed Brozovich M, Read TE, Salgado J, Akbari RP, McCormick JT, Caushaj PF (2008) Laparoscopic colectomy for apparently benign colorectal neoplasia: a word of caution. Surg Endosc 22(2):506–509CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Alder AC, Hamilton EC, Anthony T, Sarosi GA Jr (2006) Cancer risk in endoscopically unresectable colon polyps. Am J Surg 192(5):644–648CrossRefPubMed Alder AC, Hamilton EC, Anthony T, Sarosi GA Jr (2006) Cancer risk in endoscopically unresectable colon polyps. Am J Surg 192(5):644–648CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D et al (2013) The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(10):1063–1070CrossRefPubMed Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D et al (2013) The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(10):1063–1070CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nakajima K, Sharma SK, Lee SW, Milsom JW (2016) Avoiding colorectal resection for polyps: is CELS the best method? Surg Endosc 30(3):807–818CrossRefPubMed Nakajima K, Sharma SK, Lee SW, Milsom JW (2016) Avoiding colorectal resection for polyps: is CELS the best method? Surg Endosc 30(3):807–818CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wdinter H, Lang RA, Spelsberg FW, Jauch KW, Hüttl TP (2007) Laparoscopic colonoscopic rendezvous procedures for the treatment of polyps and early stage carcinomas of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(11):1377–1381CrossRef Wdinter H, Lang RA, Spelsberg FW, Jauch KW, Hüttl TP (2007) Laparoscopic colonoscopic rendezvous procedures for the treatment of polyps and early stage carcinomas of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(11):1377–1381CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jang JH, Kirchoff D, Holzman K et al (2013) Laparoscopic-facilitated endoscopic submucosal dissection, mucosal resection, and partial circumferential (“wedge”) colon wall resection for benign colorectal neoplasms that come to surgery. Surg Innov 20(3):234–240CrossRefPubMed Jang JH, Kirchoff D, Holzman K et al (2013) Laparoscopic-facilitated endoscopic submucosal dissection, mucosal resection, and partial circumferential (“wedge”) colon wall resection for benign colorectal neoplasms that come to surgery. Surg Innov 20(3):234–240CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The impact of the national bowel screening program in the Netherlands on detection and treatment of endoscopically unresectable benign polyps
Authors
C. C. M. Marres
C. J. Buskens
E. Schriever
P. C. M. Verbeek
M. W. Mundt
W. A. Bemelman
A. W. H. van de Ven
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1705-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2017 Go to the issue