Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Brief Report

The impact of the desktop computer on rheumatologist–patient consultations

Authors: Anna Booth, Amanda LeCouteur, Anna Chur-Hansen

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

This study examined the impact of computers on rheumatologist–patient communication. Fifteen rheumatologist–patient consultations were videotaped and analysed qualitatively. Patients routinely ceased their reporting on a particular topic when the rheumatologist's body and gaze were reoriented toward the computer. Rheumatologists employed the computer to direct the consultation, whilst patients took advantage of spaces in the consultation created by the physician's use of the computer to continue talking, often involving extended pain reporting. These findings are discussed in relation to the potential impact of the computer in the consultation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rosen P, Spalding SJ, Hannon MJ, Boudreau RM, Kwoh CK (2011) Parent satisfaction with the electronic medical record in an academic pediatric rheumatology practice. J Med Internet Res 13:e40PubMedCrossRef Rosen P, Spalding SJ, Hannon MJ, Boudreau RM, Kwoh CK (2011) Parent satisfaction with the electronic medical record in an academic pediatric rheumatology practice. J Med Internet Res 13:e40PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S, Reis S (2006) Electronic medical record use and physician–patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Pt Ed Couns 61:134–141CrossRef Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S, Reis S (2006) Electronic medical record use and physician–patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Pt Ed Couns 61:134–141CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Greatbatch D, Heath C, Campion P, Luff P (1995) How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction. Fam Pract 12:32–36PubMedCrossRef Greatbatch D, Heath C, Campion P, Luff P (1995) How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction. Fam Pract 12:32–36PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Newman W, Button G, Cairns P (2010) Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: the design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes. Int J Hum-Comp Stud 68:398–409CrossRef Newman W, Button G, Cairns P (2010) Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: the design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes. Int J Hum-Comp Stud 68:398–409CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Atkinson JM, Heritage J (1984) Structure of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Atkinson JM, Heritage J (1984) Structure of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7.
go back to reference Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Lang 50:696–735CrossRef Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Lang 50:696–735CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heath C (1989) Pain talk: the expression of suffering in the medical consultation. SPQ 52:113–125CrossRef Heath C (1989) Pain talk: the expression of suffering in the medical consultation. SPQ 52:113–125CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Als AB (2007) The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer; GPs' and patients' perceptions. Fam Pract 14:17–23CrossRef Als AB (2007) The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer; GPs' and patients' perceptions. Fam Pract 14:17–23CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Crane J, Crane F (2010) Optimal nonverbal communication strategies physicians should engage in to promote positive clinical outcomes. Hlth Mark Q 27:262–274CrossRef Crane J, Crane F (2010) Optimal nonverbal communication strategies physicians should engage in to promote positive clinical outcomes. Hlth Mark Q 27:262–274CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pearce C, Arnold M, Phillips C, Trumble C, Dwan K (2011) The patient and the computer in the primary care consultation. J Am Med Infor Ass 18:138–142CrossRef Pearce C, Arnold M, Phillips C, Trumble C, Dwan K (2011) The patient and the computer in the primary care consultation. J Am Med Infor Ass 18:138–142CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V (2006) Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med 4:124–131PubMedCrossRef Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V (2006) Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med 4:124–131PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weiner M, Biondich P (2005) The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships. J Gen Intern Med 21:S35–S39CrossRef Weiner M, Biondich P (2005) The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships. J Gen Intern Med 21:S35–S39CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Reich A (2012) Disciplined doctors: the electronic medical record and physicians' changing relationship to medical knowledge. Soc Sci Med 74:1021–1028PubMedCrossRef Reich A (2012) Disciplined doctors: the electronic medical record and physicians' changing relationship to medical knowledge. Soc Sci Med 74:1021–1028PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of the desktop computer on rheumatologist–patient consultations
Authors
Anna Booth
Amanda LeCouteur
Anna Chur-Hansen
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-2140-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Clinical Rheumatology 3/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine