Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Original Article

The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spinal surgery

Authors: Jason Braybrooke, Henry Ahn, Aimee Gallant, Michael Ford, Yigel Bronstein, Joel Finkelstein, Albert Yee

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. The study purpose was to evaluate the effect of wait time to surgery on patient derived generic and disease specific functional outcome following surgery. A prolonged wait to surgery may adversely affect surgical outcome. Although there is literature on the effect of wait time to surgery in surgical fields such as oncology, cardiac, opthamologic, and total joint arthroplasty, little is known regarding the effect of wait time to surgery as it pertains to the spinal surgical population. Consecutive patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative disorders were recruited. Short-Form 36 and Oswestry disability questionnaires were administered (pre-operatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-operatively). Patients completed a questionnaire regarding their experience with the wait time to surgery. The study cohort consisted of 70 patients with follow-up in 53/70 (76%). Time intervals from the onset of patient symptoms to initial consultation by family physician through investigations, spinal surgical consultation and surgery were quantified. Time intervals were compared to patient specific improvements in reported outcome following surgery using Cox Regression analysis. The effect of patient and surgical parameters on wait time was evaluated using the median time as a reference for those patients who had either a longer or shorter wait. Significant improvements in patient derived outcome were observed comparing post-operative to pre-operative baseline scores. The greatest improvements were observed in aspects relating to physical function and pain. A longer wait to surgery was associated with less improvement in outcome following surgery (SF-36 domains of BP, GH, RP, VT). A longer wait time to surgery negatively influences the results of posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions as quantified by patient derived functional outcome measures. The parameters of pain severity and physical aspects of function appear to be the most significantly affected.
Literature
1.
Buchanan R, Birch JG, Morton AA et al (2003) Do you see what I see? Looking at scoliosis surgical outcomes through orthopedists’ eyes. Spine 28(24):2700–2704 (discussion 2705)PubMedCrossRef
2.
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J et al (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245–1251PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ciampolini J, Hubble MJ (2005) Early failure of total hip replacements implanted at distant hospitals to reduce waiting lists. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87(1):31–35PubMedCrossRef
4.
Coast J (1993) The role of economic evaluation in setting priorities for elective surgery. Health Policy 24(3):243–257PubMedCrossRef
5.
Conner-Spady BL, Sanmugasunderam S, Courtright P et al (2005) The prioritization of patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery: validation of the Western Canada waiting list project cataract priority criteria tool. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 12(2):81–90PubMedCrossRef
6.
Derrett S, Paul C, Morris JM (1999) Waiting for elective surgery: effects on health-related quality of life. Int J Qual Health Care 11(1):47–57PubMedCrossRef
7.
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013PubMedCrossRef
8.
Garbuz DS, Xu M, Duncan CP et al (2006) Delays worsen quality of life outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:79–84PubMedCrossRef
9.
Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G (2000) Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001350PubMed
10.
Gibson JN, Waddell G, Grant IC (2000) Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001352PubMed
11.
Kelly KD, Voaklander D, Kramer G et al (2000) The impact of health status on waiting time for major joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15(7):877–883PubMedCrossRef
12.
Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P et al (1996) Differences between patients’ and physicians’ evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(6):835–838PubMed
13.
Lofvendahl S, Eckerlund I, Hansagi H et al (2005) Waiting for orthopaedic surgery: factors associated with waiting times and patients’ opinion. Int J Qual Health Care 17(2):133–140PubMedCrossRef
14.
Mahon JL, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH et al (2002) Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study. Cmaj 167(10):1115–1121PubMed
15.
Nunez M, Nunez E, Segur JM et al (2006) The effect of an educational program to improve health-related quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis on waiting list for total knee replacement: a randomized study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14(3):279–285PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ostendorf M, Buskens E, van Stel H et al (2004) Waiting for total hip arthroplasty: avoidable loss in quality time and preventable deterioration. J Arthroplasty 19(3):302–309PubMedCrossRef
17.
Suarez-Almazor ME, Conner-Spady B, Kendall CJ et al (2001) Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients’ health status by patients and their physicians. Med Decis Making 21(2):113–121PubMedCrossRef
18.
Weller I, Wai EK, Jaglal S et al (2005) The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(3):361–366PubMedCrossRef
19.
Wiese M, Kramer J, Bernsmann K et al (2004) The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon’s experience: comparative studies. Spine J 4(5):550–556PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spinal surgery
Authors
Jason Braybrooke
Henry Ahn
Aimee Gallant
Michael Ford
Yigel Bronstein
Joel Finkelstein
Albert Yee
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0452-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

European Spine Journal 11/2007 Go to the issue

Original Article

Spinal stenosis: assessment of motor function, VEGF expression and angiogenesis in an experimental model in the rat

Original Article

Development of a clinical diagnosis support tool to identify patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Original Article

PDGF, bFGF and IGF-I stimulate the proliferation of intervertebral disc cells in vitro via the activation of the ERK and Akt signaling pathways

Abstracts

Abstracts

Original Article

Symptomatology of recurrent low back pain in nursing and administrative professions

Original Article

Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions