Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

The impact of demographic and perceptual variables on a young adult’s decision to be covered by private health insurance

Authors: John Cantiello, Myron D Fottler, Dawn Oetjen, Ning Jackie Zhang

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The large number of uninsured individuals in the United States creates negative consequences for those who are uninsured and for those who are covered by health insurance plans. Young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 are the largest uninsured population subgroup. This subgroup warrants analysis. The major aim of this study is to determine why young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 are the largest uninsured population subgroup.

Methods

The present study seeks to determine why young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 are the largest population subgroup that is not covered by private health insurance. Data on perceived health status, perceived need, perceived value, socioeconomic status, gender, and race was obtained from a national sample of 1,340 young adults from the 2005 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and examined for possible explanatory variables, as well as data on the same variables from a national sample of 1,463 from the 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Results

Results of the structural equation model analysis indicate that insurance coverage in the 2005 sample was largely a function of higher socioeconomic status and being a non-minority. Perceived health status, perceived need, perceived value, and gender were not significant predictors of private health insurance coverage in the 2005 sample. However, in the 2008 sample, these indicators changed. Socioeconomic status, minority status, perceived health, perceived need, and perceived value were significant predictors of private health insurance coverage.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that coverage by a private health insurance plan in the 2005 sample was largely a matter of having a higher socioeconomic status and having a non-minority status.
In 2008 each of the attitudinal variables (perceived health, perceived value, and perceived need) predicted whether subjects carried private insurance. Our findings suggest that among those sampled, the young adult subgroup between the ages of 18 and 24 does not necessarily represent a unique segment of the population, with behaviors differing from the rest of the sample.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Short P. Counting and characterizing the uninsured. In: McGlaughlin C, editor. Health policy and the uninsured. Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press; 2004. Short P. Counting and characterizing the uninsured. In: McGlaughlin C, editor. Health policy and the uninsured. Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press; 2004.
3.
go back to reference Joint Economic Committee: The Complex Challenge of the Uninsured. Washington, DC; 2004. Joint Economic Committee: The Complex Challenge of the Uninsured. Washington, DC; 2004.
4.
go back to reference Voelker R. Health reforms called a “graduation gift” for young adults who lack insurance. JAMA. 2010;304:147–8.CrossRefPubMed Voelker R. Health reforms called a “graduation gift” for young adults who lack insurance. JAMA. 2010;304:147–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263–91.CrossRef Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwartz B. The paradox of choice – Why more is less. New York, NY: Harper Perennial; 2004. Schwartz B. The paradox of choice – Why more is less. New York, NY: Harper Perennial; 2004.
8.
go back to reference Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:282–98.CrossRefPubMed Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:282–98.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fishman E. Aging out of coverage: young adults with special health needs. Health Aff. 2001;20(6):254–66.CrossRef Fishman E. Aging out of coverage: young adults with special health needs. Health Aff. 2001;20(6):254–66.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Saver B, Doescher M. To buy, or not to buy: factors associated with the purchase of nongroup, private health insurance. Med Care. 2000;38:141–51.CrossRefPubMed Saver B, Doescher M. To buy, or not to buy: factors associated with the purchase of nongroup, private health insurance. Med Care. 2000;38:141–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hadley J, Reschovsky J. Health and the cost of nongroup insurance. Inquiry. 2003;40:235–53.PubMed Hadley J, Reschovsky J. Health and the cost of nongroup insurance. Inquiry. 2003;40:235–53.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Holahan J. Health status and the cost of expanding insurance coverage. Health Aff. 2001;20:279–86.CrossRef Holahan J. Health status and the cost of expanding insurance coverage. Health Aff. 2001;20:279–86.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chordas L. Lost in translation. Best's Review. 2004;105:80–4. Chordas L. Lost in translation. Best's Review. 2004;105:80–4.
14.
go back to reference Wellner A. The young & the uninsured. Am Demogr. 1999;21:72–7. Wellner A. The young & the uninsured. Am Demogr. 1999;21:72–7.
17.
go back to reference Monheit AC. The rehabilitation of health insurance mandates. Inquiry. 2008;45:3–6.PubMed Monheit AC. The rehabilitation of health insurance mandates. Inquiry. 2008;45:3–6.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Markowitz M, Gold M, Rice T. Determinants of health insurance status among young adults. Med Care. 1991;29:6–19.CrossRefPubMed Markowitz M, Gold M, Rice T. Determinants of health insurance status among young adults. Med Care. 1991;29:6–19.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Murray J. Differentiating beliefs of insured and uninsured, insurance-eligible state employees: a new application of the health belief model. PhD thesis. Louisiana State University, The School of Social Work; 2004. Murray J. Differentiating beliefs of insured and uninsured, insurance-eligible state employees: a new application of the health belief model. PhD thesis. Louisiana State University, The School of Social Work; 2004.
26.
go back to reference Friedman E. Health insurance, the uninsured, and hospitals: collision course. Front Health Serv Manage. 2005;21:3–15.PubMed Friedman E. Health insurance, the uninsured, and hospitals: collision course. Front Health Serv Manage. 2005;21:3–15.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Glied S, Stabile M. Generation vexed: age-cohort difference in employer-sponsored health insurance coverage. Health Aff. 2001;20:184–91.CrossRef Glied S, Stabile M. Generation vexed: age-cohort difference in employer-sponsored health insurance coverage. Health Aff. 2001;20:184–91.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wilcox-Goc V, Rubin J. Health insurance among the elderly. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1521–9.CrossRef Wilcox-Goc V, Rubin J. Health insurance among the elderly. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1521–9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tomarken AJ, Waller NG. Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:31–65.CrossRefPubMed Tomarken AJ, Waller NG. Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:31–65.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ullman JB. Structural equation modeling. In BG Tabachnick & LSFidell (Eds.), Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins; 2007. Ullman JB. Structural equation modeling. In BG Tabachnick & LSFidell (Eds.), Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins; 2007.
33.
go back to reference Hays RD, Revicki D, Coyne KS. Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28:295–309.CrossRefPubMed Hays RD, Revicki D, Coyne KS. Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28:295–309.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2004. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2004.
35.
go back to reference Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010.
36.
go back to reference Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondonce. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14:423. Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondonce. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14:423.
37.
go back to reference Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. Lippincott Williams & Williams: Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore; 2001. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. Lippincott Williams & Williams: Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore; 2001.
38.
go back to reference Castellucci F. The choices of private and public health insurance: a view of the American labor force. College of the Holy Cross. 2004. Castellucci F. The choices of private and public health insurance: a view of the American labor force. College of the Holy Cross. 2004.
39.
go back to reference Munkin MK, Trivedi PK. Bayesian analysis of a self-selection model with multiple outcomes using simulation-based estimation: an application to the demand for healthcare. J Econ. 2003;114:197–220.CrossRef Munkin MK, Trivedi PK. Bayesian analysis of a self-selection model with multiple outcomes using simulation-based estimation: an application to the demand for healthcare. J Econ. 2003;114:197–220.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Wan TTH. Evidence-based health care management: multivariate modeling approaches. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.CrossRef Wan TTH. Evidence-based health care management: multivariate modeling approaches. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of demographic and perceptual variables on a young adult’s decision to be covered by private health insurance
Authors
John Cantiello
Myron D Fottler
Dawn Oetjen
Ning Jackie Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0848-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue