Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original Article

The hydroxyapatite Turkish Delight: a technical note

Authors: L. Kustermans, Maurice Y. Mommaerts

Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Nasal dorsum augmentation is commonly performed using autologous cartilage grafts, also in the Turkish Delight technique. The aim of this study was to describe a modification of the Turkish Delight technique for dorsal augmentation consisting of small hydroxyapatite-calcium carbonate granules (0.5–1 mm) that were wrapped in layers of oxidized cellulose and glued with 1–2-cm3 fibrin sealant and to compare its utility with that of other techniques. Clinically stable and satisfactory results were achieved in the four cases examined. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging revealed that there was no degradation of the graft up to 2 years after surgery. The use of a modified Turkish Delight method using hydroxyapatite granules promises to be a valuable option for the correction of nasal dorsum deficiency.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Genther DJ, Papel ID (2016) Surgical nasal implants: indications and risks. Facial Plast Surg 32:488–499CrossRefPubMed Genther DJ, Papel ID (2016) Surgical nasal implants: indications and risks. Facial Plast Surg 32:488–499CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Erol OO (2000) The Turkish Delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 5:2229–2241CrossRef Erol OO (2000) The Turkish Delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 5:2229–2241CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Correia-Sa I, Amarante J, Horta R, Neto T, Silva A, Marques M (2015) Rhinoplastia secundá ria com a técnica de Turkish Delight: Relato de caso e breve revisão bibliográfica. Acta Medica Port 28:122–126CrossRef Correia-Sa I, Amarante J, Horta R, Neto T, Silva A, Marques M (2015) Rhinoplastia secundá ria com a técnica de Turkish Delight: Relato de caso e breve revisão bibliográfica. Acta Medica Port 28:122–126CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Erol OO (2016) Long-term results and refinement of the Turkish Delight technique for primary and secondary rhinoplasty: 25 years of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:423–437CrossRefPubMed Erol OO (2016) Long-term results and refinement of the Turkish Delight technique for primary and secondary rhinoplasty: 25 years of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:423–437CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bayram AA, Kilavuz AE, Serin GM (2016) Puzzle-formed modified Turkish Delight for nasal dorsum augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 27:1819–1821CrossRefPubMed Bayram AA, Kilavuz AE, Serin GM (2016) Puzzle-formed modified Turkish Delight for nasal dorsum augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 27:1819–1821CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bohluli B, Varedi P, Bagheri SC, Rezazade M (2017) Nasal radix augmentation in rhinoplasty: suggestion of an algorithm. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:41–45CrossRefPubMed Bohluli B, Varedi P, Bagheri SC, Rezazade M (2017) Nasal radix augmentation in rhinoplasty: suggestion of an algorithm. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:41–45CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Richardson S, Agni AN, Pasha Z (2011) Modified Turkish Delight: morcellized polyethylene dorsal graft for rhinoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:979–982CrossRefPubMed Richardson S, Agni AN, Pasha Z (2011) Modified Turkish Delight: morcellized polyethylene dorsal graft for rhinoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:979–982CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bullocks JM, Echo A, Guerra G, Stal S, Yuksel E (2011) A novel autologous scaffold for diced-cartilage grafts in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:569–579CrossRefPubMed Bullocks JM, Echo A, Guerra G, Stal S, Yuksel E (2011) A novel autologous scaffold for diced-cartilage grafts in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:569–579CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tasman AJ, Diener PA, Litschel R (2013) The diced cartilage glue graft for nasal augmentation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15:86–94CrossRefPubMed Tasman AJ, Diener PA, Litschel R (2013) The diced cartilage glue graft for nasal augmentation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15:86–94CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shors EC (1999) Coralline bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin N Am 30:599–613CrossRef Shors EC (1999) Coralline bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin N Am 30:599–613CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mendelson B, Jacobson S, Lavoipierre A, Huggings R (2010) The fate of porous hydroxyapatite granules used in facial skeletal augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:455–461CrossRef Mendelson B, Jacobson S, Lavoipierre A, Huggings R (2010) The fate of porous hydroxyapatite granules used in facial skeletal augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:455–461CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tuli P, Farbod F, Beal B, Jackson IT (2012) The use of hydroxyapatite granules for the correction of skeletal facial deformities. Eur J Plast Surg 35:203–208CrossRef Tuli P, Farbod F, Beal B, Jackson IT (2012) The use of hydroxyapatite granules for the correction of skeletal facial deformities. Eur J Plast Surg 35:203–208CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pollick S, Shors EC, Holmes RE, Kraut RA (1995) Bone formation and implant degradation of coralline porous ceramics placed in bone and ectopic sites. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:915–922CrossRefPubMed Pollick S, Shors EC, Holmes RE, Kraut RA (1995) Bone formation and implant degradation of coralline porous ceramics placed in bone and ectopic sites. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:915–922CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The hydroxyapatite Turkish Delight: a technical note
Authors
L. Kustermans
Maurice Y. Mommaerts
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0646-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4/2017 Go to the issue