Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine 3/2017

01-04-2017 | EM - ORIGINAL

The HEART score with high-sensitive troponin T at presentation: ruling out patients with chest pain in the emergency room

Authors: Luca Santi, Gabriele Farina, Annagiulia Gramenzi, Franco Trevisani, Margherita Baccini, Mauro Bernardi, Mario Cavazza

Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The HEART score is a simple scoring system, ranging from 0 to 10, specifically developed for risk stratification of patients with undifferentiated chest pain. It has been validated for the conventional troponin, but not for high-sensitive troponin. We assess a modified version of the HEART score using a single high-sensitivity troponin T dosage at presentation, regardless of symptom duration, and with different ECG criteria to evaluate if the patients with a low HEART score could be safely discharged early. The secondary aim was to confirm a statistically significant difference in each HEART score group (low 0–3, intermediate 4–6, high 7–10) in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events at 30 and 180 days. We retrospectively analyzed the HEART score of 1597 consecutive patients admitted to the Emergency Department of our Hospital for chest pain between January 1 and June 30, 2014. Of these, 190 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 29 were lost to follow-up. None of the 512 (37.2 %) patients with a low HEART score had an event within 180 days. The difference between the cumulative incidences of events in the three HEART score groups was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). We demonstrate that it might be possible to safely discharge Emergency Department chest pain patients with a low modified HEART score after an initial determination of high-sensitive troponin T, without a prolonged observation period or an additional cardiac testing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA et al (2010) Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 122(17):1756–1776CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA et al (2010) Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 122(17):1756–1776CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Apgar V (1953) A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the new born infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 32(4):260–267 Apgar V (1953) A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the new born infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 32(4):260–267
3.
go back to reference Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC et al (2013) A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the Emergency Department. Int J Cardiol 168:2153–2158CrossRefPubMed Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC et al (2013) A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the Emergency Department. Int J Cardiol 168:2153–2158CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC et al (2010) Chest pain in the emergency Room. A multicenter validation of the HEART score. Crit Pathw Cardiol 9:164–169CrossRefPubMed Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC et al (2010) Chest pain in the emergency Room. A multicenter validation of the HEART score. Crit Pathw Cardiol 9:164–169CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Six AJ, Cullen L, Backus BE et al (2013) The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the Emergency Department. A multinational validation study. Crit Pathw Cardiol 12:121–126CrossRefPubMed Six AJ, Cullen L, Backus BE et al (2013) The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the Emergency Department. A multinational validation study. Crit Pathw Cardiol 12:121–126CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Thygesen K, Alpert JSA, Jaffe AS et al (2012) The Writing Group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1581–1598CrossRefPubMed Thygesen K, Alpert JSA, Jaffe AS et al (2012) The Writing Group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1581–1598CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee TH, Goldman L (2000) Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 342:1187–1195CrossRefPubMed Lee TH, Goldman L (2000) Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 342:1187–1195CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff DC, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD (2011) Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? Crit Pathw Cardiol 10:128–133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff DC, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD (2011) Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? Crit Pathw Cardiol 10:128–133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S et al (2011) The Task Force for the management of ACS in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the ESC. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 32:2999–3054CrossRefPubMed Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S et al (2011) The Task Force for the management of ACS in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the ESC. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 32:2999–3054CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ et al (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 284(7):835–842CrossRefPubMed Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ et al (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 284(7):835–842CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O et al (2003) Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163(19):2345–2353CrossRefPubMed Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O et al (2003) Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163(19):2345–2353CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M et al (2007) Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better. Eur Heart J 28(9):1072–1078CrossRefPubMed Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M et al (2007) Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better. Eur Heart J 28(9):1072–1078CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhelev Z, Hyde C, Youngman E et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of single baseline measurement of Elecsys Troponin T high-sensitive assay for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 350:h15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhelev Z, Hyde C, Youngman E et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of single baseline measurement of Elecsys Troponin T high-sensitive assay for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 350:h15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference O’Connor RE, Bossaert L, Arntz HR et al (2010) Part 9: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 122:S422–S465CrossRefPubMed O’Connor RE, Bossaert L, Arntz HR et al (2010) Part 9: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 122:S422–S465CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mahler SA, Miller CD, Hollander JE et al (2013) Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol 168(2):795–802CrossRefPubMed Mahler SA, Miller CD, Hollander JE et al (2013) Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol 168(2):795–802CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lyon R, Morris AC, Caesar D, Gray S, Gray A (2007) Chest pain presenting to the emergency department—to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI? Resuscitation 74:90–93CrossRefPubMed Lyon R, Morris AC, Caesar D, Gray S, Gray A (2007) Chest pain presenting to the emergency department—to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI? Resuscitation 74:90–93CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Than M, Cullen L, Reid CM et al (2011) A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia–Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 377:1077–1084CrossRefPubMed Than M, Cullen L, Reid CM et al (2011) A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia–Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 377:1077–1084CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Poldevaart JM, Reitsma JB, Koffijberg H et al (2013) The impact of the HEART risk score in the early assessment of patients with acute chest pain design of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 13:77CrossRef Poldevaart JM, Reitsma JB, Koffijberg H et al (2013) The impact of the HEART risk score in the early assessment of patients with acute chest pain design of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 13:77CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R et al (2000) Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 342:1163–1170CrossRefPubMed Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R et al (2000) Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 342:1163–1170CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Prasad V, Cheung M, Cifu A (2012) Chest pain in the emergency department: the case against our current practice of routine noninvasive testing. Arch Intern Med 172(19):1506–1509CrossRefPubMed Prasad V, Cheung M, Cifu A (2012) Chest pain in the emergency department: the case against our current practice of routine noninvasive testing. Arch Intern Med 172(19):1506–1509CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K et al (2010) Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 56:254–261CrossRefPubMed Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K et al (2010) Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 56:254–261CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S et al (2009) Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 361:858–867CrossRefPubMed Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S et al (2009) Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 361:858–867CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D et al (2009) Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 361:868–877CrossRefPubMed Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D et al (2009) Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 361:868–877CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Carlton EW, Khattab A, Greaves K (2015) Identifying patients suitable for discharge after a single-presentation high-sensitivity troponin result: a comparison of five established risk scores and two high-sensitivity assays. Ann Emerg Med 66(6):635–645CrossRefPubMed Carlton EW, Khattab A, Greaves K (2015) Identifying patients suitable for discharge after a single-presentation high-sensitivity troponin result: a comparison of five established risk scores and two high-sensitivity assays. Ann Emerg Med 66(6):635–645CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr et al (2009) American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 120(22):2271–2306CrossRefPubMed Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr et al (2009) American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 120(22):2271–2306CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM et al (2013) 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(23):e179–e347CrossRefPubMed Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM et al (2013) 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(23):e179–e347CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, Rautaharju P, Punsar S (1960) The Electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system. Circulation 21:1160–1175CrossRefPubMed Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, Rautaharju P, Punsar S (1960) The Electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system. Circulation 21:1160–1175CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The HEART score with high-sensitive troponin T at presentation: ruling out patients with chest pain in the emergency room
Authors
Luca Santi
Gabriele Farina
Annagiulia Gramenzi
Franco Trevisani
Margherita Baccini
Mauro Bernardi
Mario Cavazza
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1828-0447
Electronic ISSN: 1970-9366
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1461-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Internal and Emergency Medicine 3/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine