Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2010

01-11-2010

The handsewn anastomosis after colon resection due to colonic cancer

Authors: M. G. Pramateftakis, G. Vrakas, P. Hatzigianni, T. Tsachalis, I. Matzoros, E. Christoforidis, D. Raptis, G. Roidos, C. Lazaridis

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Special Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of our study is to present the results of the handsewn single-layer interrupted extramucosal anastomosis following colon cancer.

Patients and methods

In the period between 1989 and 2009, 276 intestinal anastomoses were fashioned following colon resection using single-layer interrupted extramucosal 3/0 Vicryl.

Results

The mean hospital stay was 8.2 days. Twenty-three patients had postoperative complications, and the total morbidity was 8.3%. Seven anastomotic leakages occurred (2.5%). The mortality rate was 2.5%.

Conclusion

The single-layer anastomosis with interrupted extramucosal sutures after colon resection is safe and effective.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Matheson NA, McIntosh CA, Krukowski ZH (1985) Continuing experience with single layer appositional anastomosis in the large bowel. Br J Surg 72:104–106CrossRef Matheson NA, McIntosh CA, Krukowski ZH (1985) Continuing experience with single layer appositional anastomosis in the large bowel. Br J Surg 72:104–106CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE et al (2000) Single-layer continuous versus two layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis. Ann Surg 231:832–837CrossRefPubMed Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE et al (2000) Single-layer continuous versus two layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis. Ann Surg 231:832–837CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sutton CD, Marshall LJ, Williams N et al (2004) Colo-rectal anastomotic leakage often masquerades as a cardiac complication. Colorectal Dis 6:21–22CrossRefPubMed Sutton CD, Marshall LJ, Williams N et al (2004) Colo-rectal anastomotic leakage often masquerades as a cardiac complication. Colorectal Dis 6:21–22CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Leslie A, Steele RJC (2003) The interrupted serosubmucosal anastomosis-still the gold standard. Colorectal Dis 5:362–366CrossRefPubMed Leslie A, Steele RJC (2003) The interrupted serosubmucosal anastomosis-still the gold standard. Colorectal Dis 5:362–366CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Da Silva Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2002) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sao Paul Med/Rev Paul Med 120:132–136 Da Silva Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2002) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sao Paul Med/Rev Paul Med 120:132–136
Metadata
Title
The handsewn anastomosis after colon resection due to colonic cancer
Authors
M. G. Pramateftakis
G. Vrakas
P. Hatzigianni
T. Tsachalis
I. Matzoros
E. Christoforidis
D. Raptis
G. Roidos
C. Lazaridis
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue Special Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0612-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2010

Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2010 Go to the issue