Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Study protocol

The HAC Trial (Harmonic for Acute Cholecystitis) Study. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of Harmonic(H) versus Monopolar Diathermy (M) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in adults

Authors: Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni, Salomone Di Saverio, Filippo Gazzotti, Federico Coccolini, Antonio Daniele Pinna

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the developmental stage of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it was considered 'unsafe' or 'technically difficult' to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC). With increasing experience in laparoscopic surgery, a number of centers have reported on the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, suggesting that it is technically feasible but at the expense of a high conversion rate, which can be up to 35 per cent and common bile duct lesions.
The HARMONIC SCALPEL(R) (H) is the leading ultrasonic cutting and coagulating surgical device, offering surgeons important benefits including: minimal lateral thermal tissue damage, minimal charring and desiccation.
Harmonic Scalpel technology reduces the need for ligatures with simultaneous cutting and coagulation: moreover there is not electricity to or through the patient Harmonic Scalpel has a greater precision near vital structures and it produces minimal smoke with improved visibility in the surgical field.
In retrospective series LC performed with H was demonstrated feasible and effective with minimal operating time and blood loss: it was reported also a low conversion rate (3.9%).
However there are not prospective randomized controlled trials showing the advantages of H compared to MD (the commonly used electrical scalpel) in LC.

Methods/Design

Aim of this RCT is to demonstrate that H can decrease the conversion rate compared to MD in LC for AC, without a significant increase of morbidity.
The patients will be allocated in two groups: in the first group the patient will be submitted to early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H while in the second group will be submitted to early LC within 72 hours with MD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00746850
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rai R, Sinha A, Rai S: Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 44–49). Br J Surg. 2005, 92 (4): 494-10.1002/bjs.5042.CrossRefPubMed Rai R, Sinha A, Rai S: Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 44–49). Br J Surg. 2005, 92 (4): 494-10.1002/bjs.5042.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Persiani R: The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Chir (Paris). 2004, 141 (6): 343-53.CrossRef Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Persiani R: The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Chir (Paris). 2004, 141 (6): 343-53.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L: Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2005, 92 (1): 44-9. 10.1002/bjs.4836.CrossRefPubMed Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L: Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2005, 92 (1): 44-9. 10.1002/bjs.4836.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Asoglu O, Ozmen V, Karanlik H, Igci A, Kecer M, Parlak M, Unal ES: Does the complication rate increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004, 14 (2): 81-6. 10.1089/109264204322973844.CrossRefPubMed Asoglu O, Ozmen V, Karanlik H, Igci A, Kecer M, Parlak M, Unal ES: Does the complication rate increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004, 14 (2): 81-6. 10.1089/109264204322973844.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L: Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003, 7 (5): 642-5. 10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00065-9.CrossRefPubMed Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L: Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003, 7 (5): 642-5. 10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00065-9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hüscher CG, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc. 2003, 17 (3): 442-51. 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3.CrossRefPubMed Hüscher CG, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc. 2003, 17 (3): 442-51. 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Schulz K: Assessing Allocation Concealment and Blinding in Randomised Controlled Trials: Why bother?. Evid Based Nurs. 2001, 4: 4-6. 10.1136/ebn.4.1.4.CrossRefPubMed Schulz K: Assessing Allocation Concealment and Blinding in Randomised Controlled Trials: Why bother?. Evid Based Nurs. 2001, 4: 4-6. 10.1136/ebn.4.1.4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lachin JM: Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1988, 9 (4): 312-26. 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90046-3.CrossRefPubMed Lachin JM: Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1988, 9 (4): 312-26. 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90046-3.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Altman DG, Schulz KF: Statistics notes: Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials. British Medical Journal. 2001, 323 (7310): 446-7. 10.1136/bmj.323.7310.446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Altman DG, Schulz KF: Statistics notes: Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials. British Medical Journal. 2001, 323 (7310): 446-7. 10.1136/bmj.323.7310.446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Schulz KF: Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines. Lancet. 1996, 348 (9027): 596-8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)01201-9.CrossRefPubMed Schulz KF: Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines. Lancet. 1996, 348 (9027): 596-8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)01201-9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chalmers I: Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experiments. Int J Epidemiol. 2001, 30 (5): 1156-64. 10.1093/ije/30.5.1156.CrossRefPubMed Chalmers I: Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experiments. Int J Epidemiol. 2001, 30 (5): 1156-64. 10.1093/ije/30.5.1156.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D: Empirical evidence of bias dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995, 273 (5): 408-12. 10.1001/jama.273.5.408.CrossRefPubMed Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D: Empirical evidence of bias dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995, 273 (5): 408-12. 10.1001/jama.273.5.408.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The HAC Trial (Harmonic for Acute Cholecystitis) Study. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of Harmonic(H) versus Monopolar Diathermy (M) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in adults
Authors
Fausto Catena
Luca Ansaloni
Salomone Di Saverio
Filippo Gazzotti
Federico Coccolini
Antonio Daniele Pinna
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-34

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Trials 1/2009 Go to the issue