Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurocritical Care 3/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Article

The Genesis of Low Pressure Hydrocephalus

Authors: Paul T. Akins, Kern H. Guppy, Yekaterina V. Axelrod, Indro Chakrabarti, James Silverthorn, Alan R. Williams

Published in: Neurocritical Care | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Low pressure hydrocephalus (LPH) is an uncommon entity. Recognition of this treatable condition is important when clinicians are faced with the paradox of symptomatic hydrocephalus despite low intracranial pressures (ICP). Its etiology remains enigmatic.

Methods

We identified patients with LPH from the prospective, inpatient neuro-intensive care database over a 4-year period (2006–2010).

Results

Nine patients with LPH were identified over a 4-year period. The time from diagnosis of the initial neurosurgical condition to development of LPH varied from 7 days to 5 years. The sub-zero drainage method of Pang and Altschuler was successful in all cases. LPH was accompanied by transependymal edema in five patients despite low ICP. Four patients developed LPH during their initial admission for intracranial bleeding. As patients entered the LPH state, the ICP remained in a normal range yet daily CSF output from the external ventricular drain was reduced. When LPH patients were drained at sub-zero levels, daily CSF output exceeded baseline values for several days and then receded to baseline. Long-term management was achieved with low pressure shunt systems: six programmable shunts; one valveless ventriculoperitoneal shunt; two ventriculopleural shunts. Conditions most commonly associated with LPH are: subarachnoid hemorrhage, chronic hydrocephalus, brain tumors, and chronic CNS infections.

Conclusions

Low pressure hydrocephalus is a challenging diagnosis. The genesis of LPH was associated with a drop in EVD output, symptomatic ventriculomegaly, and a remarkable absence of intracranial hypertension. When LPH was treated with the sub-zero method, a ‘diuresis’ of CSF ensued. These observations support a Darcy’s flux of brain interstitial fluid due to altered brain poroelastance; in simpler terms, a boggy brain state.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dandy WE, Blackfan KD. An experimental and clinical study of internal hydrocephalus. JAMA. 1913;61:2216. Dandy WE, Blackfan KD. An experimental and clinical study of internal hydrocephalus. JAMA. 1913;61:2216.
2.
go back to reference Dandy WE, Blackfan KD. Internal hydrocephalus: second paper. Am J Dis Child. 1917;14:424–43. Dandy WE, Blackfan KD. Internal hydrocephalus: second paper. Am J Dis Child. 1917;14:424–43.
3.
go back to reference Dandy WE. Intracranial tumors and abscesses causing communicating hydrocephalus. Ann Surg. 1925;82:199–207.PubMedCrossRef Dandy WE. Intracranial tumors and abscesses causing communicating hydrocephalus. Ann Surg. 1925;82:199–207.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. NEJM. 1965;273:117–26.PubMedCrossRef Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. NEJM. 1965;273:117–26.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ingram TTS. Low pressure hydrocephalus (letter). Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971;13:676.PubMed Ingram TTS. Low pressure hydrocephalus (letter). Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971;13:676.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bannister CM. A report of eight patients with low pressure hydrocephalus treated by CSF diversion with disappointing results. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1972;27:11–5.CrossRef Bannister CM. A report of eight patients with low pressure hydrocephalus treated by CSF diversion with disappointing results. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1972;27:11–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Singounas EG, Krasanakis C, Karvounis PC. Observations on the pathogenesis of low pressure hydrocephalus. Analysis of 25 cases. Neurochirurgia. 1976;19:22–5.PubMed Singounas EG, Krasanakis C, Karvounis PC. Observations on the pathogenesis of low pressure hydrocephalus. Analysis of 25 cases. Neurochirurgia. 1976;19:22–5.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Pang D, Altschuler E. Low-pressure hydrocephalic state and viscoelastic alterations in the brain. Neurosurgery. 1994;35:643–56.PubMedCrossRef Pang D, Altschuler E. Low-pressure hydrocephalic state and viscoelastic alterations in the brain. Neurosurgery. 1994;35:643–56.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vassilyadi M, Farmer JP, Montes JL. Negative-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:486–90.PubMedCrossRef Vassilyadi M, Farmer JP, Montes JL. Negative-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:486–90.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dias MS, Li V, Pollina J. Low-pressure shunt malfunction following lumbar puncture in children with shunted obstructive hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;30:146–50.PubMedCrossRef Dias MS, Li V, Pollina J. Low-pressure shunt malfunction following lumbar puncture in children with shunted obstructive hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;30:146–50.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Owler BK, Jacobson EE, Johnston IH. Low pressure hydrocephalus: issues of diagnosis and treatment in five cases. Brit J Neurosurg. 2001;15:353–9.CrossRef Owler BK, Jacobson EE, Johnston IH. Low pressure hydrocephalus: issues of diagnosis and treatment in five cases. Brit J Neurosurg. 2001;15:353–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lesniak MS, Clatterbuck RE, Rigamonti D, Williams MA. Low pressure hydrocephalus and ventriculomegaly: hysteresis, non-linear dynamics, and the benefits of CSF diversion. Br J Neurosurg. 2002;16:555–61.PubMed Lesniak MS, Clatterbuck RE, Rigamonti D, Williams MA. Low pressure hydrocephalus and ventriculomegaly: hysteresis, non-linear dynamics, and the benefits of CSF diversion. Br J Neurosurg. 2002;16:555–61.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Daniel RT, Lee GYF, Halcrow SJ. Low-pressure hydrocephalic state complicating hemispherectomy: a case report. Epilepsia. 2002;43:563–5.PubMedCrossRef Daniel RT, Lee GYF, Halcrow SJ. Low-pressure hydrocephalic state complicating hemispherectomy: a case report. Epilepsia. 2002;43:563–5.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clarke MJ, Maher CO, Nothdurft G, Meyer F. Very low pressure hydrocephalus. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:475–8.PubMedCrossRef Clarke MJ, Maher CO, Nothdurft G, Meyer F. Very low pressure hydrocephalus. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:475–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Akins PT, Guppy KH. Sinking skin flaps, paradoxical herniation, and external brain tamponade: a review of decompressive craniectomy management. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9:269–76.PubMedCrossRef Akins PT, Guppy KH. Sinking skin flaps, paradoxical herniation, and external brain tamponade: a review of decompressive craniectomy management. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9:269–76.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hakim S, Venegas JG, Burton JD. The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus, and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model. Surg Neurol. 1976;5:187–210.PubMed Hakim S, Venegas JG, Burton JD. The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus, and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model. Surg Neurol. 1976;5:187–210.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Nagashima T, Tamaki N, Matsumoto S, Horwitz B, Seguchi Y. Biomechanics of hydrocephalus: a new theoretical model. Neurosurgery. 1987;21:898–903.PubMedCrossRef Nagashima T, Tamaki N, Matsumoto S, Horwitz B, Seguchi Y. Biomechanics of hydrocephalus: a new theoretical model. Neurosurgery. 1987;21:898–903.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pena A, Harris NG, Bolton MD, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Communicating hydrocephalus: the biomechanics of progressive ventricular enlargement revisited. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:59–63.PubMed Pena A, Harris NG, Bolton MD, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Communicating hydrocephalus: the biomechanics of progressive ventricular enlargement revisited. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:59–63.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Clarke MJ, Meyer FB. The history of mathematical modeling in hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E3.PubMedCrossRef Clarke MJ, Meyer FB. The history of mathematical modeling in hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E3.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Momjian S, Bichsel D. Nonlinear poroplastic model of ventricular dilation in hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:100–7.PubMedCrossRef Momjian S, Bichsel D. Nonlinear poroplastic model of ventricular dilation in hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:100–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Linninger AA, Sweetman B, Penn R. Normal and hydrocephalic brain dynamics: the role of reduced cerebrospinal fluid reabsorption and ventricular enlargement. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;73:1434–47.CrossRef Linninger AA, Sweetman B, Penn R. Normal and hydrocephalic brain dynamics: the role of reduced cerebrospinal fluid reabsorption and ventricular enlargement. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;73:1434–47.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Genesis of Low Pressure Hydrocephalus
Authors
Paul T. Akins
Kern H. Guppy
Yekaterina V. Axelrod
Indro Chakrabarti
James Silverthorn
Alan R. Williams
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Humana Press Inc
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9543-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Neurocritical Care 3/2011 Go to the issue