Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2010

01-02-2010 | Retinal Disorders

The flicker electroretinogram interocular amplitude ratio is a strong prognostic indicator of neovascularization in patients with central retinal vein occlusion

Authors: Hsi-Kung Kuo, Ming-Tse Kuo, Yung-Jen Chen, Pei-Chang Wu, Chih-Hsin Chen, Yi-Hao Chen

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the prognostic value of interocular amplitude ratio of flicker electroretinogram (ERG) in determining the development of neovascularization in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data obtained from flicker ERG in 51 CRVO patients. Of these, 22 eyes which had enough follow-up to differentiate ischemic CRVO from nonischemic CRVO were included for data analysis. The flicker ERG was recorded at a 30 Hz frequency after dark adaptation, and ten sweeps were averaged.

Results

Eleven eyes were ischemic and 11 eyes were nonischemic. Three amplitude parameters had the potential to explain the type of CRVO. They were amplitude of lesion eye (p = 0.0001), interocular difference of amplitude (p < 0.0001), and interocular ratio of amplitude (p < 0.0001). Both an interocular amplitude difference of  −23 μV and interocular amplitude ratio of 60% were very good cutoff points to differentiate ischemic from nonischemic CRVO. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that each of the two cutoff values had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

Conclusions

Interocular comparison of amplitude is a good solution for avoiding the variability of ERG. An interocular amplitude ratio of flicker ERG of 60% is a succinct, useful parameter in clinical practices for differentiating ischemic from nonischemic CRVO.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Breton ME, Quinn GE, Keene SS, Dahmen JC, Brucker AJ (1989) Electroretinogram parameters at presentation as predictors of rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion patients. Ophthalmology 96:1343–1352PubMed Breton ME, Quinn GE, Keene SS, Dahmen JC, Brucker AJ (1989) Electroretinogram parameters at presentation as predictors of rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion patients. Ophthalmology 96:1343–1352PubMed
2.
go back to reference Breton ME, Montzka DP, Brucker AJ, Quinn GE (1991) Electroretinogram interpretation in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 98:1937–1944 Breton ME, Montzka DP, Brucker AJ, Quinn GE (1991) Electroretinogram interpretation in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 98:1937–1944
3.
go back to reference Breton ME, Schueller AW, Montzka DP (1991) Electroretinogram b-wave implicit time and b/a wave ratio as a function of intensity in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 98:1845–1853PubMed Breton ME, Schueller AW, Montzka DP (1991) Electroretinogram b-wave implicit time and b/a wave ratio as a function of intensity in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 98:1845–1853PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gouras P, MacKay J (1992) Supernormal cone electroretinograms in central retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:508–515PubMed Gouras P, MacKay J (1992) Supernormal cone electroretinograms in central retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:508–515PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hayreh SS (1983) Classification of central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 90:458–74PubMed Hayreh SS (1983) Classification of central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 90:458–74PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hayreh SS, Klugman MR, Podhajsky P, Kolder HE (1989) Electroretinography in central retinal vein occlusion. Correlation of electroretinographic changes with pupillary abnormalities. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227:549–561 Hayreh SS, Klugman MR, Podhajsky P, Kolder HE (1989) Electroretinography in central retinal vein occlusion. Correlation of electroretinographic changes with pupillary abnormalities. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227:549–561
7.
go back to reference Hayreh SS, Klugman MR, Beri M, Kimura AE, Podhajsky P (1990) Differentiation of ischemic from non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion during the early acute phase. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 228:201–217CrossRefPubMed Hayreh SS, Klugman MR, Beri M, Kimura AE, Podhajsky P (1990) Differentiation of ischemic from non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion during the early acute phase. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 228:201–217CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jonas JB, Harder B (2007) Ophthalmodynamometric differences between ischemic vs nonischemic retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 143:112–116CrossRefPubMed Jonas JB, Harder B (2007) Ophthalmodynamometric differences between ischemic vs nonischemic retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 143:112–116CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Johnson MA, Marcus S, Elman MJ, McPhee TJ (1988) Neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion: Electroretinographic findings. Arch Ophthalmol 106:348–352PubMed Johnson MA, Marcus S, Elman MJ, McPhee TJ (1988) Neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion: Electroretinographic findings. Arch Ophthalmol 106:348–352PubMed
10.
go back to reference Johnson MA, McPhee TJ (1993) Electroretinopraphic findings in iris neovascularization due to acute central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 111:806–814PubMed Johnson MA, McPhee TJ (1993) Electroretinopraphic findings in iris neovascularization due to acute central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 111:806–814PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kjeka O, Bredrup C, Krohn J (2007) Photopic 30 Hz flicker electroretinography predicts ocular neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:640–643CrossRefPubMed Kjeka O, Bredrup C, Krohn J (2007) Photopic 30 Hz flicker electroretinography predicts ocular neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:640–643CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Larsson J, Andreasson S, Bauer B (1998) Cone b-wave implicit time as an early predictor of rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 125:247–249CrossRefPubMed Larsson J, Andreasson S, Bauer B (1998) Cone b-wave implicit time as an early predictor of rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 125:247–249CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Larsson J, Bauer B, Cavallin-Sjoberg U, Andreasson S (1998) Fluorescein angiography versus ERG for predicting the prognosis in central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:456–460CrossRefPubMed Larsson J, Bauer B, Cavallin-Sjoberg U, Andreasson S (1998) Fluorescein angiography versus ERG for predicting the prognosis in central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:456–460CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Larsson J, Bauer B, Andreasson S (2000) The 30-Hz flicker cone ERG for monitoring the early course of central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:187–190CrossRefPubMed Larsson J, Bauer B, Andreasson S (2000) The 30-Hz flicker cone ERG for monitoring the early course of central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:187–190CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Larsson J, Andreasson S (2001) Photopic 30 Hz flicker ERG as a predictor for rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 85:683–685CrossRefPubMed Larsson J, Andreasson S (2001) Photopic 30 Hz flicker ERG as a predictor for rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 85:683–685CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Matsui Y, Katsumi O, Mehta MC, Hirose T (1994) Correction of electroretinographic and fluorescein angiographic findings in unilateral central retinal vein obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:449–457CrossRefPubMed Matsui Y, Katsumi O, Mehta MC, Hirose T (1994) Correction of electroretinographic and fluorescein angiographic findings in unilateral central retinal vein obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:449–457CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Morrell AJ, Thompson DA, Gibson JM, Kritzinger EE, Drasdo N (1991) Electroretinography as a prognostic indicator of neovascularization in CRVO. Eye 5:362–368PubMed Morrell AJ, Thompson DA, Gibson JM, Kritzinger EE, Drasdo N (1991) Electroretinography as a prognostic indicator of neovascularization in CRVO. Eye 5:362–368PubMed
18.
go back to reference Matsui Y, Katsumi O, Sakaue H, Hirose T (1994) Electroretinogram b/a wave ratio improvement in central retinal vein obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 78:191–198CrossRefPubMed Matsui Y, Katsumi O, Sakaue H, Hirose T (1994) Electroretinogram b/a wave ratio improvement in central retinal vein obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 78:191–198CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Matsui Y, Katsumi O, McMeel JW, Hirose T (1994) Prognostic value of initial electroretinogram in central retinal vein obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:75–81CrossRefPubMed Matsui Y, Katsumi O, McMeel JW, Hirose T (1994) Prognostic value of initial electroretinogram in central retinal vein obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:75–81CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sabates R, Hirose T, McMeel JW (1983) Electroretinopraphy in the prognosis and classification of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 101:232–235PubMed Sabates R, Hirose T, McMeel JW (1983) Electroretinopraphy in the prognosis and classification of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 101:232–235PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sakaue H, Katsumi O, Hirose T (1989) Electroretinographic findings in fellow eyes of patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 107:1459–1462PubMed Sakaue H, Katsumi O, Hirose T (1989) Electroretinographic findings in fellow eyes of patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 107:1459–1462PubMed
22.
go back to reference Severns ML, Johnson MA, Merritt SA (1991) Automated estimation of implicit time and amplitude from the flicker electroretinogram. Appl Optics 30:2106–2112CrossRef Severns ML, Johnson MA, Merritt SA (1991) Automated estimation of implicit time and amplitude from the flicker electroretinogram. Appl Optics 30:2106–2112CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Severns ML, Johnson MA (1993) Predicting outcome in central retinal vein occlusion using the flicker electroretinogram. Arch Ophthalmol 111:1123–1130PubMed Severns ML, Johnson MA (1993) Predicting outcome in central retinal vein occlusion using the flicker electroretinogram. Arch Ophthalmol 111:1123–1130PubMed
24.
go back to reference Severns ML, Johnson MA (1993) The variability of the b-wave of the electroretinogram with stimulus luminance. Documenta Ophthalmologica 84:291–299CrossRefPubMed Severns ML, Johnson MA (1993) The variability of the b-wave of the electroretinogram with stimulus luminance. Documenta Ophthalmologica 84:291–299CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group (1997) Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 115:486–491 The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group (1997) Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 115:486–491
26.
go back to reference Williamson TH, Keating D, Bradnam M (1997) Electroretinography of central retinal vein occlusion under scotopic and photopic conditions: what to measure? Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75:48–53CrossRefPubMed Williamson TH, Keating D, Bradnam M (1997) Electroretinography of central retinal vein occlusion under scotopic and photopic conditions: what to measure? Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75:48–53CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The flicker electroretinogram interocular amplitude ratio is a strong prognostic indicator of neovascularization in patients with central retinal vein occlusion
Authors
Hsi-Kung Kuo
Ming-Tse Kuo
Yung-Jen Chen
Pei-Chang Wu
Chih-Hsin Chen
Yi-Hao Chen
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1205-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2010 Go to the issue