Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Otology

The first results of a totally implanted active middle ear device

Authors: Maria da Conceição Peixoto, Cristina Miranda, Mafalda Bento, Susana Oliveira, Rui Pratas, Victor Correia da Silva

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the first outcomes of a fully implantable active middle ear device.

Methods

Retrospective observational nonrandomized group study. Settings: Private hospital. Fifteen patients underwent device implantation between December 2014 and June 2017. The pre-operative and post-operative air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) thresholds were evaluated. The functional gain, speech perception in silence and in noise, and localization abilities were also analyzed.

Results

Sixteen active middle ear implantations were performed. Post-operatively, the mean pure tone thresholds were 50.5 dB ( ± 12.64) for BC and 64.9 dB ( ± 15.36) for AC. No differences were found between the post-operative and pre-operative audiometric thresholds before activating the system (p > 0.05). Post-operatively, the mean thresholds in the free field after the device was activated were 46.8 dB, 45.75 dB, 42.6 dB, and 43.38 dB at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The global results of speech understanding in silence were 50.7 dB, 47.18 dB, 42 dB, and 42 dB for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Patients with mixed hearing loss had better results than those with sensorineural hearing loss. Speech discrimination in noise and localization was improved.

Conclusions

Despite the small number of patients, our results confirmed that this fully implantable active middle ear device is a viable treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss who cannot or do not want to use traditional hearing aids for clinical or cosmetic reasons.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ernst A, Todt I, Wagner J (2015) Safety and effectiveness of the Vibrant Soundbridge in treating conductive and mixed hearing loss: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 126:1451–1457CrossRef Ernst A, Todt I, Wagner J (2015) Safety and effectiveness of the Vibrant Soundbridge in treating conductive and mixed hearing loss: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 126:1451–1457CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bruschini L, Forli F, Santoro A et al (2009) Fully implantable Otologics MET CarinaTM device for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Preliminary surgical and clinical results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 29:79–85PubMedPubMedCentral Bruschini L, Forli F, Santoro A et al (2009) Fully implantable Otologics MET CarinaTM device for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Preliminary surgical and clinical results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 29:79–85PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Bittencourt AG, Burke PR, Jardim IS et al (2014) Implantable and semi-implantable hearing aids: a review of history, indications, and surgery. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 18:303–310CrossRef Bittencourt AG, Burke PR, Jardim IS et al (2014) Implantable and semi-implantable hearing aids: a review of history, indications, and surgery. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 18:303–310CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zwartentok JW, Mulder JJS, Snik Ad FM et al (2016) Active middle ear implantation: long-term medical and technical follow-up, implant survival, and complications. Otol Neurotol 37:513–519CrossRef Zwartentok JW, Mulder JJS, Snik Ad FM et al (2016) Active middle ear implantation: long-term medical and technical follow-up, implant survival, and complications. Otol Neurotol 37:513–519CrossRef
6.
go back to reference George L (2006) Report of the medical technology assessment working group. Duke University, Durham, New York George L (2006) Report of the medical technology assessment working group. Duke University, Durham, New York
7.
go back to reference Fredrickson JM, Coticchia JM, Khosla S (1996) Current status in the development of implantable middle ear hearing aids. Adv Otol 10:189–204 Fredrickson JM, Coticchia JM, Khosla S (1996) Current status in the development of implantable middle ear hearing aids. Adv Otol 10:189–204
8.
go back to reference Bruschini L, Forli F, Passetti S et al (2010) Fully implantable Otologics MET Carina™ device for the treatment of sensorineural and mixed hearing loss: audio-otological results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 130:1147–1153CrossRef Bruschini L, Forli F, Passetti S et al (2010) Fully implantable Otologics MET Carina™ device for the treatment of sensorineural and mixed hearing loss: audio-otological results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 130:1147–1153CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jenkins HA, Atkins JS, Horlbeck D et al (2008) Otologics fully implantable hearing system: phase I trial 1-year results. Otol Neurotol 29:534–541CrossRef Jenkins HA, Atkins JS, Horlbeck D et al (2008) Otologics fully implantable hearing system: phase I trial 1-year results. Otol Neurotol 29:534–541CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fredrickson J, Cotcchia J, Kohosla S (1995) Investigations into an implantable electromagnetic hearing device for moderate to severe sensorineural loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 28:107–120PubMed Fredrickson J, Cotcchia J, Kohosla S (1995) Investigations into an implantable electromagnetic hearing device for moderate to severe sensorineural loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 28:107–120PubMed
11.
go back to reference Rameh C, Meller R, Lavieille JP et al (2010) Long-term patient satisfaction with different middle ear hearing implants in sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 31:883–892CrossRef Rameh C, Meller R, Lavieille JP et al (2010) Long-term patient satisfaction with different middle ear hearing implants in sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 31:883–892CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lefebvre PP, Gisbert J, Cuda D et al (2017) A retrospective multicentre cohort review of patient characteristics and surgical aspects versus the long-term outcomes for recipients of a fully implantable active middle ear implant. Audiol Neurootol 21:333–345CrossRef Lefebvre PP, Gisbert J, Cuda D et al (2017) A retrospective multicentre cohort review of patient characteristics and surgical aspects versus the long-term outcomes for recipients of a fully implantable active middle ear implant. Audiol Neurootol 21:333–345CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jenkins HA, Pergola N, Kasic J (2007) Intra-operative ossicular loading with the Otologics fully implantable hearing device. Acta Otolaryngol 127:360–364CrossRef Jenkins HA, Pergola N, Kasic J (2007) Intra-operative ossicular loading with the Otologics fully implantable hearing device. Acta Otolaryngol 127:360–364CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Debeaupte M, Decullier E, Tringali S et al (2015) Evolution of the reliability of the fully implantable middle ear transducer over successive generations. Otol Neurotol 36:625–630CrossRef Debeaupte M, Decullier E, Tringali S et al (2015) Evolution of the reliability of the fully implantable middle ear transducer over successive generations. Otol Neurotol 36:625–630CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Klein K, Nardelli A, Stafinski T (2012) A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of fully implantable middle ear hearing devices: the carina and esteem systems. Otol Neurotol 33:916–992PubMed Klein K, Nardelli A, Stafinski T (2012) A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of fully implantable middle ear hearing devices: the carina and esteem systems. Otol Neurotol 33:916–992PubMed
Metadata
Title
The first results of a totally implanted active middle ear device
Authors
Maria da Conceição Peixoto
Cristina Miranda
Mafalda Bento
Susana Oliveira
Rui Pratas
Victor Correia da Silva
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05557-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2019 Go to the issue