Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Scientific Article

The fibular head projection is of limited use as a radiographic landmark in preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Doerte Matziolis, Marius Meiser, Norbert Sieber, Ulf Teichgräber, Georg Matziolis

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The projection of the fibular head is recommended as a quality indicator of a correct radiographic projection. However, this landmark has yet to be sufficiently validated.

Methods

The MRIs of 334 knee joints were included. On the MRIs, the distance between the FH and lateral tibial cortical bone was simulated in projections parallel to surgically relevant axes. Then, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the distance of the FH to the lateral tibial cortical bone and the projection plane causing this was determined.

Results

A projection of the knee joint perpendicular to Akagi’s line projected the center of the fibular head on average 4.8 ± 2.9 mm laterally of the tibial cortical bone, parallel to the maximum mediolateral axis of the tibia 7.5 ± 3.4 mm, parallel to the posterior condylar axis 5.6 ± 3.6 mm and parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis 6.1 ± 3.5 mm laterally of the tibial cortical bone. An almost linear correlation was seen, with 1.9° tilting of the projection plane per mm change in distance between the fibular head and tibial cortical bone. At the same time, the interindividual scatter was over 60°.

Conclusions

The rule of thumb for a partial overlap of the fibular head by the tibia in the case of a correct antero-posterior projection plane was also confirmed. However, a considerable interindividual variability of the position of the FH was found, which limits a conclusion regarding the quality of the radiographic projection on the basis of the position of the fibular head.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brooks P. Seven cuts to the perfect total knee. Orthopedics. 2009;32. Brooks P. Seven cuts to the perfect total knee. Orthopedics. 2009;32.
2.
go back to reference Nam D, Vajapey S, Haynes JA, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Does use of a variable distal femur resection angle improve radiographic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016. Nam D, Vajapey S, Haynes JA, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Does use of a variable distal femur resection angle improve radiographic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016.
3.
go back to reference Palanisami D, Iyyampillai G, Shanmugam S, Natesan R, S R. Individualised distal femoral cut improves femoral component placement and limb alignment during total knee replacement in knees with moderate and severe varus deformity. Int Orthop. 2016. Palanisami D, Iyyampillai G, Shanmugam S, Natesan R, S R. Individualised distal femoral cut improves femoral component placement and limb alignment during total knee replacement in knees with moderate and severe varus deformity. Int Orthop. 2016.
4.
go back to reference Shi X, Li H, Zhou Z, Shen B, Yang J, Pei F. Comparison of postoperative alignment using fixed vs individual valgus correction angle in primary Total knee arthroplasty with lateral bowing femur. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:976–83.CrossRef Shi X, Li H, Zhou Z, Shen B, Yang J, Pei F. Comparison of postoperative alignment using fixed vs individual valgus correction angle in primary Total knee arthroplasty with lateral bowing femur. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:976–83.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;102–6. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;102–6.
6.
go back to reference Brasseur JL. The sign of the fibular head. An indication of torsion? J Radiol. 1990;71:531–4.PubMed Brasseur JL. The sign of the fibular head. An indication of torsion? J Radiol. 1990;71:531–4.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Maderbacher G, Schaumburger J, Baier C, Zeman F, Springorum H-R, Dornia C, et al. Predicting knee rotation by the projection overlap of the proximal fibula and tibia in long-leg radiographs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:2982–8.CrossRefPubMed Maderbacher G, Schaumburger J, Baier C, Zeman F, Springorum H-R, Dornia C, et al. Predicting knee rotation by the projection overlap of the proximal fibula and tibia in long-leg radiographs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:2982–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Matziolis G, Pfitzner T, Thiele K, Matziolis D, Perka C. Influence of the position of the fibular head after implantation of a total knee prosthesis on femorotibial rotation. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e610–4.CrossRefPubMed Matziolis G, Pfitzner T, Thiele K, Matziolis D, Perka C. Influence of the position of the fibular head after implantation of a total knee prosthesis on femorotibial rotation. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e610–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Victor J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:365–72.CrossRefPubMed Victor J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:365–72.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tanavalee A, Yuktanandana P, Ngarmukos C. Surgical epicondylar axis vs anatomical epicondylar axis for rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thail. 2001;84(Suppl 1):S401–8. Tanavalee A, Yuktanandana P, Ngarmukos C. Surgical epicondylar axis vs anatomical epicondylar axis for rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thail. 2001;84(Suppl 1):S401–8.
11.
go back to reference Matziolis G, Boenicke H, Pfiel S, Wassilew G, Perka C. The gap technique does not rotate the femur parallel to the epicondylar axis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:163–6.CrossRefPubMed Matziolis G, Boenicke H, Pfiel S, Wassilew G, Perka C. The gap technique does not rotate the femur parallel to the epicondylar axis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:163–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;213–9. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;213–9.
13.
go back to reference Lemaire P, Pioletti DP, Meyer FM, Meuli R, Dörfl J, Leyvraz PF. Tibial component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: bone coverage and extensor apparatus alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:251–7.CrossRefPubMed Lemaire P, Pioletti DP, Meyer FM, Meuli R, Dörfl J, Leyvraz PF. Tibial component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: bone coverage and extensor apparatus alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:251–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Siston RA, Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:65–9.CrossRefPubMed Siston RA, Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:65–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kannan A, Hawdon G, McMahon SJ. Effect of flexion and rotation on measures of coronal alignment after TKA. J Knee Surg. 2012;25:407–10.CrossRefPubMed Kannan A, Hawdon G, McMahon SJ. Effect of flexion and rotation on measures of coronal alignment after TKA. J Knee Surg. 2012;25:407–10.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The fibular head projection is of limited use as a radiographic landmark in preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Doerte Matziolis
Marius Meiser
Norbert Sieber
Ulf Teichgräber
Georg Matziolis
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2705-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Skeletal Radiology 10/2017 Go to the issue