Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2004

01-10-2004 | Original article

The Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system for appendicitis increases positive predictive value in fertile women—A prospective study in 455 patients randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendectomy

Authors: L. Enochsson, T. Gudbjartsson, A. Hellberg, C. Rudberg, J. Wenner, I. Ringqvist, S. Sörensen, G. Fenyö

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Suspected appendicitis is one of the most common indications for acute laparotomy or laparoscopy. The negative laparotomy and laparoscopy rates are high, often in the range of 15–30%, and especially high in some groups of patients such as women of child-bearing age and young patients. Different scoring systems have been introduced in order to improve diagnostic accuracy. The aim of the present study was to analyse the outcome of the Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system in a prospectively randomized multicenter trial and to analyze how well the score performed in stratified subgroups.

Methods

The variables of the Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system were collected in a prospective study comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in suspected appendicitis and with four participating centers. None of the hospitals had used the scoring system previously. Since surgeons were unfamiliar with the score, they could not use it as a diagnostic aid. When comparing the score with the clinical outcome, retrospectively, the investigators interpreting the score were blinded regarding the surgical outcome.

Results

Positive predictive value (PPV) of the Fenyö-Lindberg score was higher than that of the surgeon’s clinical diagnosis in the patient cohort [0.90 vs 0.79 (p < 0.001)]. The score demonstrated an improvement of PPV in women [0.83 vs 0.70 (p < 0.01)]. PPV was increased in women between 15 and 50 years of age. In women aged 15–30 years and 31–50 years PPV increased from 0.69 to 0.82 and 0.68 to 0.86, respectively (p < 0.01). Both the sensitivity (0.77) and the specificity (0.69) of the score were, however, low.

Conclusion

The Fenyö-Lindberg score is an inexpensive clinical tool that may improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age, which is a group of patients where the diagnostic accuracy usually is low and where the arsenal of diagnostic tools such as computed tomography is limited because of radiation. The low specificity of the score in women of childbearing age must, however, be kept in mind.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Albiston, E 2002The role of radiological imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisCan J Gastroenterol16451463PubMed Albiston, E 2002The role of radiological imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisCan J Gastroenterol16451463PubMed
2.
go back to reference Alvarado, A 1986A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitisAnn Emerg Med15557564PubMed Alvarado, A 1986A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitisAnn Emerg Med15557564PubMed
3.
go back to reference Andersson, RE, Hugander, A, Thulin, AJ 1992Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rateEur J Surg1583741PubMed Andersson, RE, Hugander, A, Thulin, AJ 1992Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rateEur J Surg1583741PubMed
4.
go back to reference Balthazar, EJ, Megibow, AJ, Siegel, SE, Birnbaum, BA 1991Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CTRadiology1802124PubMed Balthazar, EJ, Megibow, AJ, Siegel, SE, Birnbaum, BA 1991Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CTRadiology1802124PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bendeck, SE, Nino-Murcia, M, Berry, GJ, Jeffrey, RB,Jr 2002Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation ratesRadiology225131136PubMed Bendeck, SE, Nino-Murcia, M, Berry, GJ, Jeffrey, RB,Jr 2002Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation ratesRadiology225131136PubMed
6.
go back to reference Fenyö, G, Lindberg, G, Blind, P, Enochsson, L, Oberg, A 1997Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring systemEur J Surg163831838PubMed Fenyö, G, Lindberg, G, Blind, P, Enochsson, L, Oberg, A 1997Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring systemEur J Surg163831838PubMed
7.
go back to reference Fergusson, JA, Hitos, K, Simpson, E 2002Utility of white cell count and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisAust NZ J Surg72781785CrossRef Fergusson, JA, Hitos, K, Simpson, E 2002Utility of white cell count and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisAust NZ J Surg72781785CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Glaser, F, Sannwald, GA, Buhr, HJ, Kuntz, C, Mayer, H, Klee, F, et al. 1995General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomyAnn Surg221372380PubMed Glaser, F, Sannwald, GA, Buhr, HJ, Kuntz, C, Mayer, H, Klee, F,  et al. 1995General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomyAnn Surg221372380PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hellberg, A, Rudberg, C, Kullman, E, Enochsson, L, Fenyo, G, Graffner, H, et al. 1999Prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomyBr J Surg864853CrossRefPubMed Hellberg, A, Rudberg, C, Kullman, E, Enochsson, L, Fenyo, G, Graffner, H,  et al. 1999Prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomyBr J Surg864853CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jess, P, Bjerregaard, B, Brynitz, S, Holst-Christensen, J, Kalaja, E, Lund-Kristensen, J 1981Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complicationsAm J Surg141232234CrossRefPubMed Jess, P, Bjerregaard, B, Brynitz, S, Holst-Christensen, J, Kalaja, E, Lund-Kristensen, J 1981Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complicationsAm J Surg141232234CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lalos, O 1988Risk factors for tubal infertility among infertile and fertile womenEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol29129136PubMed Lalos, O 1988Risk factors for tubal infertility among infertile and fertile womenEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol29129136PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lehmann-Willenbrock, E, Mecke, H, Riedel, HH 1990Sequelae of appendectomy, with special reference to intra-abdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertilityGynecol Obstet Invest29241245PubMed Lehmann-Willenbrock, E, Mecke, H, Riedel, HH 1990Sequelae of appendectomy, with special reference to intra-abdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertilityGynecol Obstet Invest29241245PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ohmann, C, Yang, Q, Franke, C 1995Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study GroupEur J Surg161273281PubMed Ohmann, C, Yang, Q, Franke, C 1995Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study GroupEur J Surg161273281PubMed
14.
go back to reference Pieper, R, Kager, L 1982The incidence of acute appendicitis and appendectomy. An epidemiological study of 971 cases. Acta Chir Scand1484549PubMed Pieper, R, Kager, L 1982The incidence of acute appendicitis and appendectomy. An epidemiological study of 971 cases. Acta Chir Scand1484549PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ramirez, JM, Deus, J 1994Practical score to aid decision making in doubtful cases of appendicitisBr J Surg81680683PubMed Ramirez, JM, Deus, J 1994Practical score to aid decision making in doubtful cases of appendicitisBr J Surg81680683PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rao, PM, Feltmate, CM, Rhea, JT, Schulick, AH, Novelline, RA 1999Helical computed tomography in differentiating appendicitis and acute gynecologic conditionsObstet Gynecol93417421CrossRefPubMed Rao, PM, Feltmate, CM, Rhea, JT, Schulick, AH, Novelline, RA 1999Helical computed tomography in differentiating appendicitis and acute gynecologic conditionsObstet Gynecol93417421CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stroman, DL, Bayouth, CV, Kuhn, JA, Westmoreland, M, Jones, RC, Fisher, TL, et al. 1999The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisAm J Surg178485489CrossRefPubMed Stroman, DL, Bayouth, CV, Kuhn, JA, Westmoreland, M, Jones, RC, Fisher, TL,  et al. 1999The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisAm J Surg178485489CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Broek, WT, Bijnen, BB, Rijbroek, B, Gouma, DJ 2002Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitisEur J Surg168349354CrossRefPubMed Broek, WT, Bijnen, BB, Rijbroek, B, Gouma, DJ 2002Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitisEur J Surg168349354CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Viktrup, L, Hee, P 1998Fertility and long-term complications four to nine years after appendectomy during pregnancyActa Obstet Gynecol Scand77746750CrossRefPubMed Viktrup, L, Hee, P 1998Fertility and long-term complications four to nine years after appendectomy during pregnancyActa Obstet Gynecol Scand77746750CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zielke, A, Hasse, C, Sitter, H, Rothmund, M 1998Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective studyEur J Surg164201209CrossRefPubMed Zielke, A, Hasse, C, Sitter, H, Rothmund, M 1998Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective studyEur J Surg164201209CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system for appendicitis increases positive predictive value in fertile women—A prospective study in 455 patients randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendectomy
Authors
L. Enochsson
T. Gudbjartsson
A. Hellberg
C. Rudberg
J. Wenner
I. Ringqvist
S. Sörensen
G. Fenyö
Publication date
01-10-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9323-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2004 Go to the issue