Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Article

The Expression of Checkpoint and DNA Repair Genes in Head and Neck Cancer as Possible Predictive Factors

Authors: Orsolya Rusz, Margit Pál, Éva Szilágyi, László Rovó, Zoltán Varga, Bernadett Tomisa, Gabriella Fábián, Levente Kovács, Olga Nagy, Petra Mózes, Zita Reisz, László Tiszlavicz, Péter Deák, Zsuzsanna Kahán

Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

DNA damage response failure may influence the efficacy of DNA-damaging treatments. We determined the expression of 16 genes involved in distinct DNA damage response pathways, in association with the response to standard therapy. Twenty patients with locoregionally advanced, squamous cell head and neck carcinoma were enrolled. The treatment included induction chemotherapy (iChT) with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy (ChRT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone. The volumetric metabolic therapeutic response was determined by [18F]FDG-PET/CT. In the tumor and matched normal tissues collected before treatment, the gene expressions were examined via the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The down-regulation of TP53 was apparently associated with a poor response to iChT, its up-regulation with complete regression in 2 cases. 7 cases with down-regulated REV1 expression showed complete regression after ChRT/RT, while 1 case with REV1 overexpression was resistant to RT. The overexpression of WRN was an independent predictor of tumor relapse. Our results suggest that an altered expression of REV1 predicts sensitivity to RT, while WRN overexpression is an unfavorable prognostic factor.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Hitt R, Grau JJ, López-Pousa A, et al. (2014) A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol 25:216–225. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt461 CrossRefPubMed Hitt R, Grau JJ, López-Pousa A, et al. (2014) A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol 25:216–225. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdt461 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214CrossRefPubMed Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wiggenraad R, Mast M, van Santvoort J, Hoogendoorn M, Struikmans H (2005) ConPas: a 3-D conformal parotid gland-sparing irradiation technique for bilateral neck treatment as an alternative to IMRT. Strahlenther Onkol 181:673–682. doi:10.1007/s00066-005-1413-8 CrossRefPubMed Wiggenraad R, Mast M, van Santvoort J, Hoogendoorn M, Struikmans H (2005) ConPas: a 3-D conformal parotid gland-sparing irradiation technique for bilateral neck treatment as an alternative to IMRT. Strahlenther Onkol 181:673–682. doi:10.​1007/​s00066-005-1413-8 CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132:365–386PubMed Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132:365–386PubMed
24.
go back to reference Horiuchi C, Taguchi T, Yoshida T, et al. (2008) Early assessment of clinical response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma using fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography. Auris Nasus Larynx 35:103–108. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2007.05.003 CrossRefPubMed Horiuchi C, Taguchi T, Yoshida T, et al. (2008) Early assessment of clinical response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma using fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography. Auris Nasus Larynx 35:103–108. doi:10.​1016/​j.​anl.​2007.​05.​003 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Won HS, Lee YS, Jeon EK, et al. (2014) Clinical outcome of induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 34:5709–5714PubMed Won HS, Lee YS, Jeon EK, et al. (2014) Clinical outcome of induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 34:5709–5714PubMed
26.
go back to reference Argiris A (2005) Induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer: will history repeat itself? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 3:393–403 Argiris A (2005) Induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer: will history repeat itself? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 3:393–403
27.
go back to reference Bhatia KSS, King AD, Yu K-H, et al. (2010) Does primary tumour volumetry performed early in the course of definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma improve prediction of primary site outcome? Br J Radiol 83:964–970. doi:10.1259/bjr/27631720 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bhatia KSS, King AD, Yu K-H, et al. (2010) Does primary tumour volumetry performed early in the course of definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma improve prediction of primary site outcome? Br J Radiol 83:964–970. doi:10.​1259/​bjr/​27631720 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Hoebers FJP, Pameijer FA, de Bois J, et al. (2008) Prognostic value of primary tumor volume after concurrent chemoradiation with daily low-dose cisplatin for advanced-stage head and neck carcinoma. Head Neck 30:1216–1223. doi:10.1002/hed.20865 CrossRefPubMed Hoebers FJP, Pameijer FA, de Bois J, et al. (2008) Prognostic value of primary tumor volume after concurrent chemoradiation with daily low-dose cisplatin for advanced-stage head and neck carcinoma. Head Neck 30:1216–1223. doi:10.​1002/​hed.​20865 CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Shiga H, Heath EI, Rasmussen et al (1999) Prognostic value of p53, glutathione S-transferase pi, and thymidylate synthase for neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5:4097–4104 Shiga H, Heath EI, Rasmussen et al (1999) Prognostic value of p53, glutathione S-transferase pi, and thymidylate synthase for neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5:4097–4104
31.
go back to reference Falette N, Paperin MP, Treilleux I, et al. (1998) Prognostic value of P53 gene mutations in a large series of node-negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 58:1451–1455PubMed Falette N, Paperin MP, Treilleux I, et al. (1998) Prognostic value of P53 gene mutations in a large series of node-negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 58:1451–1455PubMed
32.
go back to reference Cabelguenne A, Blons H, de Waziers I, et al. (2000) p53 alterations predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective series. J Clin Oncol 18:1465–1473CrossRefPubMed Cabelguenne A, Blons H, de Waziers I, et al. (2000) p53 alterations predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective series. J Clin Oncol 18:1465–1473CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Santana P, Peña LA, Haimovitz-Friedman A, et al. (1996) Acid sphingomyelinase-deficient human lymphoblasts and mice are defective in radiation-induced apoptosis. Cell 86:189–199CrossRefPubMed Santana P, Peña LA, Haimovitz-Friedman A, et al. (1996) Acid sphingomyelinase-deficient human lymphoblasts and mice are defective in radiation-induced apoptosis. Cell 86:189–199CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Chmura SJ, Mauceri HJ, Advani S, et al. (1997) Decreasing the apoptotic threshold of tumor cells through protein kinase C inhibition and sphingomyelinase activation increases tumor killing by ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 57:4340–4347PubMed Chmura SJ, Mauceri HJ, Advani S, et al. (1997) Decreasing the apoptotic threshold of tumor cells through protein kinase C inhibition and sphingomyelinase activation increases tumor killing by ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 57:4340–4347PubMed
35.
go back to reference Hendry JH, West CM (1997) Apoptosis and mitotic cell death: their relative contributions to normal-tissue and tumour radiation response. Int J Radiat Biol 71:709–719CrossRefPubMed Hendry JH, West CM (1997) Apoptosis and mitotic cell death: their relative contributions to normal-tissue and tumour radiation response. Int J Radiat Biol 71:709–719CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Jung M, Notario V, Dritschilo A (1992) Mutations in the p53 gene in radiation-sensitive and -resistant human squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 52:6390–6393PubMed Jung M, Notario V, Dritschilo A (1992) Mutations in the p53 gene in radiation-sensitive and -resistant human squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 52:6390–6393PubMed
37.
go back to reference DiBiase SJ, Guan J, Curran WJ, Iliakis G (1999) Repair of DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitivity to killing in an isogenic group of p53 mutant cell lines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:743–751CrossRefPubMed DiBiase SJ, Guan J, Curran WJ, Iliakis G (1999) Repair of DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitivity to killing in an isogenic group of p53 mutant cell lines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:743–751CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Chau NG, Rabinowits G, Haddad RI (2014) Human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx cancer (HPV-OPC): treatment options. Curr Treat Options in Oncol 15:595–610. doi:10.1007/s11864-014-0309-1 Chau NG, Rabinowits G, Haddad RI (2014) Human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx cancer (HPV-OPC): treatment options. Curr Treat Options in Oncol 15:595–610. doi:10.​1007/​s11864-014-0309-1
Metadata
Title
The Expression of Checkpoint and DNA Repair Genes in Head and Neck Cancer as Possible Predictive Factors
Authors
Orsolya Rusz
Margit Pál
Éva Szilágyi
László Rovó
Zoltán Varga
Bernadett Tomisa
Gabriella Fábián
Levente Kovács
Olga Nagy
Petra Mózes
Zita Reisz
László Tiszlavicz
Péter Deák
Zsuzsanna Kahán
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1219-4956
Electronic ISSN: 1532-2807
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-016-0088-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Pathology & Oncology Research 2/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine