Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 3/2010

01-03-2010 | Original Paper

The Everyday Feeling Questionnaire: the structure and validation of a measure of general psychological well-being and distress

Authors: Rudolf Uher, Robert Goodman

Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Psychological distress and well-being underlie the continuum of susceptibility to common mental disorders. Our objective was to provide a simple and acceptable measure of psychological distress and well-being to collect information from subjects and informants in non-clinical samples, to explore its internal structure, concurrent and external validity.

Method

Self and partner versions of the ten-item Everyday Feeling Questionnaire (EFQ) were administered to 5,279 adults. The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was used to establish concurrent validity. Socioeconomic status, child psychopathology, and family functioning served as external validators.

Results

The EFQ was internally consistent with all items loading strongly on a single common factor. Item response analysis showed excellent sensitivity of the ten items, balanced contribution of well-being and distress items and good information content across a broad range. The internal structure of partner version did not differ from self-report. The constructs measured by the EFQ and GHQ were distinct, but highly correlated. The EFQ’s correlations with external validators were stronger than GHQ’s ones.

Conclusion

Psychological well-being and distress are measurable as a single construct, using the EFQ. The partner-report version will facilitate the collection of data on multiple household members or on the same individual from two or more sources.
Literature
1.
2.
Vollebergh WAM, Iedema J, Bijl RV, de Graaf R, Smit F, Ormel J (2001) The structure and stability of common mental disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:597–603CrossRefPubMed
3.
Prisciandaro JJ, Roberts JE (2008) A comparison of the predictive abilities of dimensional and categorical models of unipolar depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. Psychol Med. doi:10.​1017/​S003329170800452​2
4.
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125:276–302CrossRef
5.
Ryff CD, Keyes CL (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol 69:719–727CrossRefPubMed
6.
Abbott RA, Ploubidis GB, Huppert FA, Kuh D, Wandsworth MEJ, Croudace TJ (2006) Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:1–16CrossRef
7.
Beekman AT, Penninx BW, Deeg DJ, de Beurs E, Geerling SW, van Tilburg W (2002) The impact of depression on the well-being, disability and use of services in older adults: a longitudinal perspective. Acta Psychiatr Scand 105:20–27CrossRefPubMed
8.
Spijker J, Graaf R, Bijl RV, Beekman AT, Ormel J, Nolen WA (2004) Functional disability and depression in the general population. Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Acta Psychiatr Scand 110:208–214CrossRefPubMed
9.
Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:1337–1345CrossRefPubMed
10.
Shojaei T, Wazana A, Pitrou I, Kovess V (2008) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: validation study in French school-aged children and cross-cultural comparisons. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00127-008-0489-8
11.
Vostanis P (2006) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: research and clinical applications. Curr Opin Psychiatry 19:367–372CrossRefPubMed
12.
Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 27:191–197CrossRefPubMed
13.
Harding TW, De Arango MV, Baltazar J, Climent CE, Ibrahim HHA, Ladrigo-Ignacio L, Srinivasa MR, Wig NN (1980) Mental disorders in primary health care: a study of their frequency and diagnosis in four developing countries. Psychol Med 10:231–241CrossRefPubMed
14.
Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32:959–976CrossRefPubMed
15.
Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L (1974) The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 19:1–15CrossRefPubMed
16.
Heun R, Burkart M, Maier W, Bech P (1999) Internal and external validity of the WHO Well-Being Scale in the elderly general population. Acta Psychiatr Scand 99:171–178CrossRefPubMed
17.
Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, van der Ploeg HM, Ader HJ, Heine RJ (2000) The well-being questionnaire: evidence for a three-factor structure with 12 items (W-BQ12). Psychol Med 30:455–462CrossRefPubMed
18.
Hu Y, Stewart-Brown S, Twigg L, Weich S (2007) Can the 12-item General Health Questionnaire be used to measure positive mental health? Psychol Med 37:1005–1013CrossRefPubMed
19.
Schmitz N, Kruse J, Tress W (1999) Psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in a German primary care sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 100:462–468CrossRefPubMed
20.
Goldberg DP, Rickels K, Downing R, Hesbacher P (1976) A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. Br J Psychiatry 129:61–67CrossRefPubMed
21.
Patel V, Araya R, Chowdhary N, King M, Kirkwood B, Nayak S, Simon G, Weiss HA (2008) Detecting common mental disorders in primary care in India: a comparison of five screening questionnaires. Psychol Med 38:221–228CrossRefPubMed
22.
Achenbach TM (2006) As others see us: clinical and research implications of cross-informant correlations for psychopathology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15:94–98CrossRef
23.
Sherr L, Dave S, Lucas P, Senior R, Nazareth I (2006) A feasibility study on recruiting fathers of young children to examine the impact of paternal depression on child development. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 36:295–309CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kahn RS, Brandt D, Whitaker RC (2004) Combined effect of mothers’ and fathers’ mental health symptoms on children’s behavioral and emotional well-being. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158:721–729CrossRefPubMed
25.
Ramchandani P, Stein A, Evans J, O’Connor TG (2005) Paternal depression in the postnatal period and child development: a prospective population study. Lancet 365:2201–2205CrossRefPubMed
26.
Achenbach TM, Krukowski RA, Dumenci L, Ivanova MY (2005) Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. Psychol Bull 131:361–382CrossRefPubMed
27.
Caspi A, Taylor A, Smart M, Jackson J, Tagami S, Moffitt TE (2001) Can women provide reliable information about their children’s fathers? Cross-informant agreement about men’s lifetime antisocial behaviour. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42:915–920CrossRefPubMed
28.
Kamphuis JH, Emmelkamp PMG, de Vries V (2003) Moderated validity of clinical informant assessment: use in depression and personality. Clin Psychol Psychother 10:102–107CrossRef
29.
Barnette JJ (2000) Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: if you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educ Psychol Meas 60:361–370CrossRef
30.
Uher R, Farmer A, Maier W, Rietschel M, Hauser J, Marusic A, Mors O, Elkin A, Williamson RJ, Schmael C, Henigsberg N, Perez J, Mendlewicz J, Janzing JG, Zobel A, Skibinska M, Kozel D, Stamp AS, Bajs M, Placentino A, Barreto M, McGuffin P, Aitchison KJ (2008) Measuring depression: comparison and integration of three scales in the GENDEP study. Psychol Med 38:289–300CrossRefPubMed
31.
Ryff CD, Singer B (1996) Psychological well-being: meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychother Psychosom 65:14–23CrossRefPubMed
32.
Green H, McGinnity A, Meltzer H, Ford T, Godman R (2005) Mental health of children and young people in Great Britain, 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
33.
34.
Cairney J, Thorpe C, Rietschlin J, Avison WR (1999) 12-Month prevalence of depression among single and married mothers in the 1994 National Population Health Survey. Can J Public Health 90:320–324PubMed
35.
Lorant V, Deliege D, Eaton W, Robert A, Philippot P, Ansseau M (2003) Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 157:98–112CrossRefPubMed
36.
Byles J, Byrne C, Boyle MH, Offord DR (1988) Ontario Child Health Study: reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Fam Process 27:97–104CrossRefPubMed
37.
Miller IW, Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Keitner GI (1985) The MacMaster Family Assessment Device: reliability and validity. J Marital Fam Ther 11:345–356CrossRef
38.
Muthen LK, Muthen BO (2007) Mplus User’s Guide: statistical analysis with latent variables. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles
39.
Flora DB, Curran PJ (2004) An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods 9:466–491CrossRefPubMed
40.
Hazlett-Stevens H, Ullman JB, Craske MG (2004) Factor structure of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: examination of a method factor. Assessment 11:361–370CrossRefPubMed
41.
Mook J, Kleijn WC, van der Ploeg HM (1991) Symptom-positively and -negatively worded items in two popular self-report inventories of anxiety and depression. Psychol Rep 69:551–560CrossRefPubMed
42.
Thissen D, Chen WH, Bock D (2003) MULTILOG 7. SSI Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, USA. Ref Type: Computer Program
43.
Baker F (2001) The basics of item response theory. ERIC clearing house on assessment and evaluation. University of Maryland, College Park
44.
45.
ten Have M, Vollebergh W, Bijl RV, de GR (2001) Predictors of incident care service utilisation for mental health problems in the Dutch general population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 36:141–149CrossRefPubMed
46.
Galbaud du FG, Kovess V, Boivin JF (1994) Spouse similarity for psychological distress and well-being: a population study. Psychol Med 24:431–447CrossRef
47.
Ready RE, Clark LA (2005) Psychiatric patient and informant reports of patient behavior. J Pers 73:1–22CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Everyday Feeling Questionnaire: the structure and validation of a measure of general psychological well-being and distress
Authors
Rudolf Uher
Robert Goodman
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Electronic ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0074-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 3/2010 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Violence and delayed social independence among young adult British men

Original Paper

Brief measure of posttraumatic stress reactions: Impact of Event Scale-6

Original Paper

Narrating uncertainties about treatment of mental health conditions

Original Paper

Prevalence of depression diagnosis and prescription of antidepressants in East and West Germany: an analysis of health insurance data

Original Paper

Public sector mental health systems in South Africa: inter-provincial comparisons and policy implications

Original Paper

First episode psychosis and the trail to secondary care: help-seeking and health-system delays