Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 1/2010

Open Access 01-01-2010 | Original Article

The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population

Authors: Emily M. Webb, Zhen J. Wang, Fergus V. Coakley, Liina Poder, Antonio C. Westphalen, Benjamin M. Yeh

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of appendices with an equivocal appearance at computed tomography (CT) in a control population. We retrospectively identified a control population of 150 patients who underwent CT of the abdomen and pelvis for evaluation of hematuria (without abdominal pain, fever, or colonic disease). One reader measured the diameter of the appendix and noted if the appendix was either isodense in appearance or airless and fluid filled. Sixty-seven of 150 cases (44.6%) demonstrated appendiceal diameter greater than 6 mm. The appendix was collapsed or isodense in 34/150 cases (22.7%). Only ten of 150 or 6.6% of cases were isodense in combination with diameter greater than 6 mm, and none had diameter greater than 10 mm. Only one of 150 cases (0.67%) demonstrated airless fluid within the lumen, and the appendix measured less than 6 mm. While the diameter of the normal appendix is frequently greater than 6 mm, none measured greater than 10 mm in combination with ambiguous morphology. Furthermore, in the normal appendix, airless fluid filling the lumen is a rare appearance with a prevalence of less than 1%. While appendicitis could undoubtedly occur in an isodense appendix between 6 and 10 mm in diameter, such an appearance can occur in up to 6.6% of the normal population
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21(5):686–692CrossRefPubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21(5):686–692CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, Kook SH, Kim SK, Kwag HJ, Chung EC (2003) The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol 44(6):574–582CrossRefPubMed Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, Kook SH, Kim SK, Kwag HJ, Chung EC (2003) The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol 44(6):574–582CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ives EP, Sung S, McCue P, Durrani H, Halpern EJ (2008) Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol 15(8):996–1003CrossRefPubMed Ives EP, Sung S, McCue P, Durrani H, Halpern EJ (2008) Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol 15(8):996–1003CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(6):1813–1820PubMed Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(6):1813–1820PubMed
5.
go back to reference Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR (1988) Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167(2):327–329PubMed Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR (1988) Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167(2):327–329PubMed
6.
go back to reference Rioux M (1992) Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(4):773–778PubMed Rioux M (1992) Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(4):773–778PubMed
7.
go back to reference Simonovský V (1999) Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix. Clin Radiol 54(8):533–539CrossRefPubMed Simonovský V (1999) Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix. Clin Radiol 54(8):533–539CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vignault F, Filiatrault D, Brandt ML, Garel L, Grignon A, Ouimet A (1990) Acute appendicitis in children: evaluation with US. Radiology 176(2):501–504PubMed Vignault F, Filiatrault D, Brandt ML, Garel L, Grignon A, Ouimet A (1990) Acute appendicitis in children: evaluation with US. Radiology 176(2):501–504PubMed
9.
go back to reference Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin CB, Casola G (2005) CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults. Eur J Radiol 15(10):2096–2103CrossRef Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin CB, Casola G (2005) CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults. Eur J Radiol 15(10):2096–2103CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225(2):400–406CrossRefPubMed Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225(2):400–406CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bursali A, Arac M, Oner AY, Celik H, Eksioglu S, Gumus T (2005) Evaluation of the normal appendix at low-dose non-enhanced spiral CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 11(1):45–50PubMed Bursali A, Arac M, Oner AY, Celik H, Eksioglu S, Gumus T (2005) Evaluation of the normal appendix at low-dose non-enhanced spiral CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 11(1):45–50PubMed
12.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Siegel SE, Birnbaum BA (1991) Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology 180(1):21–24PubMed Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Siegel SE, Birnbaum BA (1991) Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology 180(1):21–24PubMed
13.
go back to reference Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(4):763–766PubMed Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(4):763–766PubMed
14.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ (1997) Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(5):1275–1280PubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ (1997) Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(5):1275–1280PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA et al (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202(1):139–144PubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA et al (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202(1):139–144PubMed
16.
go back to reference Funaki B, Grosskreutz SR, Funaki CN (1998) Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(4):997–1001PubMed Funaki B, Grosskreutz SR, Funaki CN (1998) Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(4):997–1001PubMed
17.
go back to reference Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213(2):341–346PubMed Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213(2):341–346PubMed
18.
go back to reference Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA et al (1999) The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 178(6):485–489CrossRefPubMed Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA et al (1999) The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 178(6):485–489CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2000) Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT—review of 100 cases. Radiology 217(1):159–163PubMed Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2000) Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT—review of 100 cases. Radiology 217(1):159–163PubMed
20.
go back to reference Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M et al (2001) Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 220(3):683–690CrossRefPubMed Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M et al (2001) Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 220(3):683–690CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ et al (2001) Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(4):933–941PubMed Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ et al (2001) Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(4):933–941PubMed
22.
go back to reference Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H (2002) Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(6):1319–1325PubMed Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H (2002) Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(6):1319–1325PubMed
23.
go back to reference Crawford JM (1994) The gastrointestinal tract. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL (eds) Robbins pathologic basis of disease. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 823 Crawford JM (1994) The gastrointestinal tract. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL (eds) Robbins pathologic basis of disease. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 823
24.
go back to reference Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(5):1313–1319CrossRefPubMed Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(5):1313–1319CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population
Authors
Emily M. Webb
Zhen J. Wang
Fergus V. Coakley
Liina Poder
Antonio C. Westphalen
Benjamin M. Yeh
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-009-0826-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Emergency Radiology 1/2010 Go to the issue