Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2/2020

01-06-2020 | Scientific Contribution

The elephant in the room: a postphenomenological view on the electronic health record and its impact on the clinical encounter

Authors: Tania Moerenhout, Gary S. Fischer, Ignaas Devisch

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Use of electronic health records (EHR) within clinical encounters is increasingly pervasive. The digital record allows for data storage and sharing to facilitate patient care, billing, research, patient communication and quality-of-care improvement—all at once. However, this multifunctionality is also one of the main reasons care providers struggle with the EHR. These problems have often been described but are rarely approached from a philosophical point of view. We argue that a postphenomenological case study of the EHR could lead to more in-depth insights. We will focus on two concepts—transparency and multistability—and translate them to the specific situation of the EHR. Transparency is closely related to an embodiment relation in which the user becomes less aware of the technology: it fades into the background, becoming a means of experience. A second key concept is that of multistability, referring to how a technology can serve multiple purposes or can have different meanings in different contexts. The EHR in this sense is multistable by design. Future EHR design could incorporate multistable information differently, allowing the provider to focus on patient care when interacting with the EHR. Moreover we argue that the use of the EHR in the daily workflow should become more transparent, while awareness of the computer in the specific context of the patient-provider relationship should increase.
Footnotes
1
Other authors have conducted postphenomenological studies of concepts and topics in health care though—we will mention just three studies here, but there are many more publications. Anette Forss provided a very interesting analysis of the interaction between practitioners, microscopes and cells or the patient in cytology labs (Forss 2012). Marjolein de Boer and Jenny Slatman applied the concept of technological mediation to better understand the impact of technologies on the agency of women with breast cancer (de Boer and Slatman 2018). And lastly, Adam Rosenfeld analyzed the multistability of brain-dead bodies in the book Postphenomenological Investigations (Rosenfeld 2015).
 
2
Strictly, this could also be seen as a form of ‘use’, but use in the context of the patient–provider relationship. ‘Context’ as introduced by Yoni Van Den Eede, would rather refer to a meta-level of health care organization. However, we will focus on use within the context of the patient–provider relationship and refer to this as our focus on context.
 
Literature
go back to reference Achterhuis, Hans. 2001. American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press. Achterhuis, Hans. 2001. American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.
go back to reference De Boer, M., and J. Slatman. 2018. The Mediated Breast: Technology, Agency, and Breast Cancer. Human Studies 41 (2): 275–292.CrossRef De Boer, M., and J. Slatman. 2018. The Mediated Breast: Technology, Agency, and Breast Cancer. Human Studies 41 (2): 275–292.CrossRef
go back to reference Goodman, Kenneth. 2015. Ethics, Medicine and Information Technology. Intelligent Machines and the Transformation of Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Goodman, Kenneth. 2015. Ethics, Medicine and Information Technology. Intelligent Machines and the Transformation of Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
go back to reference Ihde, Don. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. New York: SUNY Press. Ihde, Don. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. New York: SUNY Press.
go back to reference Ihde, D. 2012. Can Continental Philosophy Deal with the New Technologies? The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26 (2): 321–332.CrossRef Ihde, D. 2012. Can Continental Philosophy Deal with the New Technologies? The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26 (2): 321–332.CrossRef
go back to reference Jastrow, J. 1899. The Mind’s Eye. Popular Science Monthly 54: 299–312. Jastrow, J. 1899. The Mind’s Eye. Popular Science Monthly 54: 299–312.
go back to reference Libicki, M. and I. Brahmakulam. 2004. The Costs and Benefits of Moving to the ICD-10 Code Sets. RAND report. ISBN: 0-8330-3585-1. Libicki, M. and I. Brahmakulam. 2004. The Costs and Benefits of Moving to the ICD-10 Code Sets. RAND report. ISBN: 0-8330-3585-1.
go back to reference Nguyen, A.N., D. Truran, M. Kemp, et al. 2018. Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Coding: Effectiveness of an NLP-Based Approach Using SNOMED CT to ICD-10 Mappings. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018: 807–816. Nguyen, A.N., D. Truran, M. Kemp, et al. 2018. Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Coding: Effectiveness of an NLP-Based Approach Using SNOMED CT to ICD-10 Mappings. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018: 807–816.
go back to reference Rosenberger, Robert, and P.P. Verbeek. 2015. A Field Guide to Postphenomenology. In Postphenomenological Investigations. Essays on Human-Technology Relations, ed. Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, 9–42. London: Lexington Books. Rosenberger, Robert, and P.P. Verbeek. 2015. A Field Guide to Postphenomenology. In Postphenomenological Investigations. Essays on Human-Technology Relations, ed. Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, 9–42. London: Lexington Books.
go back to reference Rosenfeld, Adam. 2015. Mediating Multiplicity: Brain-Dead Bodies and Organ Transplant Protocols. In Postphenomenological Investigations. Essays on Human-Technology Relations, ed. Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, 203–215. London: Lexington Books. Rosenfeld, Adam. 2015. Mediating Multiplicity: Brain-Dead Bodies and Organ Transplant Protocols. In Postphenomenological Investigations. Essays on Human-Technology Relations, ed. Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, 203–215. London: Lexington Books.
go back to reference Stewart, E., D. Kahn, and E. Lee. 2015. Internal Medicine Progress Note Writing Attitudes and Practices in an Electronic Health Record. Journal of Hospital Medicine 10: 525–529.CrossRef Stewart, E., D. Kahn, and E. Lee. 2015. Internal Medicine Progress Note Writing Attitudes and Practices in an Electronic Health Record. Journal of Hospital Medicine 10: 525–529.CrossRef
go back to reference Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2011. Moralizing Technology. Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2011. Moralizing Technology. Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Wachter, Robert. 2015. The Digital Doctor. Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age. New York: McGraw Hill Education. Wachter, Robert. 2015. The Digital Doctor. Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Metadata
Title
The elephant in the room: a postphenomenological view on the electronic health record and its impact on the clinical encounter
Authors
Tania Moerenhout
Gary S. Fischer
Ignaas Devisch
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09923-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2/2020 Go to the issue