Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

The efficiency of a donor-recipient program using infertile donors’ egg cryo-banking: A Brazilian reality

Authors: Rita de Cássia Sávio Figueira, Amanda S. Setti, Daniela P. A. F. Braga, Assumpto Iaconelli Jr, Edson Borges Jr

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether Brazilian egg donation treatment outcomes with oocytes donated from infertile couples are equivalent to those obtained worldwide with oocytes donated from fertile egg-donors.

Methods

In this descriptive study, egg-donation cycles from 259 women, performed from January 2009 to July 2013, were evaluated. Oocytes were obtained from patients undergoing ICSI who decided to donate their surplus oocytes. We described the survival, fertilization, blastocyst, implantation and pregnancy rates obtained in our infertile donor-recipient program. In addition, we described the results obtained in previous published studies.

Results

In our egg-donation program we obtained a fertilization rate of 72.9 %, a blastocyst formation rate of 53.2 %, an implantation rate of 31.1 % and the estimated clinical pregnancy rate per warmed oocyte was 5.4 %. The analyzed studies, performed between 2008 and 2013, included varying numbers of egg-donors (range: 20–600), warmed oocytes (range: 123–3826) and survival rates (range: 85.6–92.5 %). Fertilization rates ranged from 74.2 to 87.0 %, blastocyst formation rate ranged from 41.3 % to 68.0 %, implantation rates ranged from 24.7 % to 55.3 % and the clinical pregnancy rate per warmed oocyte ranged from 3.9 % to 9.8 %.

Conclusions

New and reassuring information derived from our egg-donation program demonstrates outcomes similar to those reported for other egg donation programs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1657–64.PubMedCrossRef Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1657–64.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2239–46.PubMedCrossRef Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2239–46.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cohen J, Grudzinskas G, Johnson M. Welcome to the '100 % club'! Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:375–6.PubMedCrossRef Cohen J, Grudzinskas G, Johnson M. Welcome to the '100 % club'! Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:375–6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:536–54.PubMedCrossRef Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:536–54.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Garcia JI, Noriega-Portella L, Noriega-Hoces L. Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:782–90.PubMedCrossRef Garcia JI, Noriega-Portella L, Noriega-Hoces L. Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:782–90.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nagy ZP, Chang CC, Shapiro DB, Bernal DP, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, et al. Clinical evaluation of the efficiency of an oocyte donation program using egg cryo-banking. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:520–6.PubMedCrossRef Nagy ZP, Chang CC, Shapiro DB, Bernal DP, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, et al. Clinical evaluation of the efficiency of an oocyte donation program using egg cryo-banking. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:520–6.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference ASRM and SART practice committees report. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:37–43. ASRM and SART practice committees report. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:37–43.
8.
go back to reference Quaas AM, Melamed A, Chung K, Bendikson KA, Paulson RJ. Egg banking in the United States: current status of commercially available cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:827–31.PubMedCrossRef Quaas AM, Melamed A, Chung K, Bendikson KA, Paulson RJ. Egg banking in the United States: current status of commercially available cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:827–31.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Setti AS, Cortezzi SS, Figueira Rde C, Martinhago CD, Braga DP, Iaconelli Jr A, et al. A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:443–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Setti AS, Cortezzi SS, Figueira Rde C, Martinhago CD, Braga DP, Iaconelli Jr A, et al. A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:443–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sole M, Santalo J, Boada M, Clua E, Rodriguez I, Martinez F, et al. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2087–92.PubMedCrossRef Sole M, Santalo J, Boada M, Clua E, Rodriguez I, Martinez F, et al. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2087–92.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stoop D, De Munck N, Jansen E, Platteau P, Van den Abbeel E, Verheyen G, et al. Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:180–5.PubMedCrossRef Stoop D, De Munck N, Jansen E, Platteau P, Van den Abbeel E, Verheyen G, et al. Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:180–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Trokoudes KM, Pavlides C, Zhang X. Comparison outcome of fresh and vitrified donor oocytes in an egg-sharing donation program. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1996–2000.PubMedCrossRef Trokoudes KM, Pavlides C, Zhang X. Comparison outcome of fresh and vitrified donor oocytes in an egg-sharing donation program. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1996–2000.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The efficiency of a donor-recipient program using infertile donors’ egg cryo-banking: A Brazilian reality
Authors
Rita de Cássia Sávio Figueira
Amanda S. Setti
Daniela P. A. F. Braga
Assumpto Iaconelli Jr
Edson Borges Jr
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0270-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2014 Go to the issue