Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Otology

The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery

Authors: Sultan Şevik Eliçora, Duygu Erdem, Aykut Erdem Dinç, Murat Damar, Sultan Bişkin

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

To investigate the effects of surgery type [intact canal wall (ICW) or canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy] and different ossiculoplasty materials on hearing outcome in single-staged cholesteatoma surgery. A retrospective case–control study. A total of 116 cases (97 adults, 29 children) underwent surgery, including ossiculoplasty, between 2012 and 2015 for cholesteatoma. Patients who had undergone surgery for the first time, and whose grafts were successful, were included in the study. Patients with adhesive otitis media, unsuccessful grafts, revision and recurrent cases, radical mastoidectomy, and craniofacial anomalies were excluded. Audiogram examinations of the enrolled patients were performed 3–6 months after surgery, and the audiometric results were analyzed according to the criteria of the American Academy of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. All ossiculoplasties were performed during the first operation. The preoperative average air–bone gap (ABG) of the patients was decreased from 31.37 ± 10.1 to 27.42 ± 10.4 dB; this decrease was found to be highly significant (p = 0.0001). Concerning the ICW technique, statistical evaluation of the hearing gain at frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz, as well as the mean frequency, showed a high level of significance. Improvement at 4000 Hz was not found to be statistically significant. When the ABGs at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, and the mean frequency in patients with an hydroxyapatite-partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (HA-PORP) or autograft-partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (APORP), were evaluated, it was found that, at 4000 Hz, the APORP significantly reduced the ABG (p = 0.02). No significant difference was determined between patients with the hydroxyapatite-total ossicular replacement prosthesis (HA-TORP) and those with the autograft-total ossicular replacement prosthesis (ATORP) (p = 0.565). Although the use of the malleus as an APORP was found to be less effective than other autografts, the degree of advantage of using the incus, malleus, cortical bone, and cartilage did not significantly differ between materials (p = 0.152). Despite the effects of the incus, malleus, and cortical bone not differing in terms of the postoperative ABG (p = 0.160), incus usage was highly beneficial for hearing gain (p = 0.009). Despite CWD tympanoplasty affecting all frequencies, it has a particularly negative effect on the hearing threshold at 1000 Hz. In patients with partial ossicular replacement, autogenous grafts are more successful in restoring hearing at high frequencies, particularly at 4000 Hz. Although autogenous materials do not differ in terms of partial replacement effectiveness, the incus has been shown to be most effective for total replacement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Preciado DA (2012) Biology of cholesteatoma: special considerations in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:319–321CrossRefPubMed Preciado DA (2012) Biology of cholesteatoma: special considerations in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:319–321CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Blanco P, González F, Holguín J, Guerra C (2014) Surgical management of middle ear cholesteatoma and reconstruction at the same time. Colomb Med (Cali) 45:127–131 Blanco P, González F, Holguín J, Guerra C (2014) Surgical management of middle ear cholesteatoma and reconstruction at the same time. Colomb Med (Cali) 45:127–131
3.
go back to reference Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73CrossRefPubMed Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lailach S, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Kemper M, Beleites T, Neudert M (2015) Hearing outcome after sequential cholesteatoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Epub ahead of print] Lailach S, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Kemper M, Beleites T, Neudert M (2015) Hearing outcome after sequential cholesteatoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Epub ahead of print]
5.
go back to reference Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M (2007) Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 28:492–498CrossRefPubMed Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M (2007) Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 28:492–498CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Goldenberg RA, Emmet JR (2001) Current use of implants in middle ear surgery. Otol Neurotol 22:145–152CrossRefPubMed Goldenberg RA, Emmet JR (2001) Current use of implants in middle ear surgery. Otol Neurotol 22:145–152CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Grote JJ, Kuypers W, Groot K (1981) Use of sintered hydroxyapatite in the middle ear surgery. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 43:248–254CrossRefPubMed Grote JJ, Kuypers W, Groot K (1981) Use of sintered hydroxyapatite in the middle ear surgery. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 43:248–254CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gelfand YM, Chang CY (2011) Ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium versus hydroxyapatite implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144:954–958CrossRefPubMed Gelfand YM, Chang CY (2011) Ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium versus hydroxyapatite implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144:954–958CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Maeng JW, Kim HJ (2012) Effects of middle ear lesions on pre and postoperative hearing outcomes in patients with chronic otitis media. Korean J Audiol. 16:18–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maeng JW, Kim HJ (2012) Effects of middle ear lesions on pre and postoperative hearing outcomes in patients with chronic otitis media. Korean J Audiol. 16:18–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Kubo T (2008) Long-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty in comparison to short-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 29:326–329CrossRefPubMed Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Kubo T (2008) Long-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty in comparison to short-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 29:326–329CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Martin TP, Weller MD, Kim DS, Smith MC (2009) Results of primary ossiculoplasty in ears with an intact stapes superstructure and malleus handle: inflammation in the middle ear at the time of surgery does not affect hearing outcomes. Clin Otolaryngol 34:218–224CrossRefPubMed Martin TP, Weller MD, Kim DS, Smith MC (2009) Results of primary ossiculoplasty in ears with an intact stapes superstructure and malleus handle: inflammation in the middle ear at the time of surgery does not affect hearing outcomes. Clin Otolaryngol 34:218–224CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Iseri M, Ustundag E, Ulubil A, Ozturk M, Bircan O (2012) Synchronous ossiculoplasty with titanium prosthesis during canal wall down surgery for advanced cholesteatoma: anatomical and hearing outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 126:131–135CrossRefPubMed Iseri M, Ustundag E, Ulubil A, Ozturk M, Bircan O (2012) Synchronous ossiculoplasty with titanium prosthesis during canal wall down surgery for advanced cholesteatoma: anatomical and hearing outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 126:131–135CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dinç AE, Damar M, Erdem D, Şevik Eliçora S, Akyıldız İ, Kumbul YÇ (2015) Audiometric correlations with pathologies of ossicular chain in 159 ears with chronic otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol doi:10.1111/coa.12561 [Epub ahead of print] Dinç AE, Damar M, Erdem D, Şevik Eliçora S, Akyıldız İ, Kumbul YÇ (2015) Audiometric correlations with pathologies of ossicular chain in 159 ears with chronic otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol doi:10.​1111/​coa.​12561 [Epub ahead of print]
14.
go back to reference Shaw EAG (1974) The external ear. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 5/1. Springer, Berlin, pp 455–490 Shaw EAG (1974) The external ear. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 5/1. Springer, Berlin, pp 455–490
15.
go back to reference Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73CrossRefPubMed Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Martin AD, Harner SG (2004) Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope 114:61–64CrossRefPubMed Martin AD, Harner SG (2004) Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope 114:61–64CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Redaelli de Zinis LO (2008) Titanium versus hydroxyapatite ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:1283–1287CrossRefPubMed Redaelli de Zinis LO (2008) Titanium versus hydroxyapatite ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:1283–1287CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference De Vos C, Gersdorff M, Gerard JM (2007) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:61–67CrossRefPubMed De Vos C, Gersdorff M, Gerard JM (2007) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:61–67CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stankovic MD (2008) Audiologic results of surgery for cholesteatoma: short- and long-term follow-up of influential factors. Otol Neurotol 29:933–940CrossRefPubMed Stankovic MD (2008) Audiologic results of surgery for cholesteatoma: short- and long-term follow-up of influential factors. Otol Neurotol 29:933–940CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Quaranta A, Cassano P, Carbonara G (1988) Cholesteatoma surgery: open vs closed tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 9:229–231PubMed Quaranta A, Cassano P, Carbonara G (1988) Cholesteatoma surgery: open vs closed tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 9:229–231PubMed
21.
go back to reference Iñiguez-Cuadra R, Alobid I, Borés-Domenech A et al (2010) Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 31:409–414CrossRefPubMed Iñiguez-Cuadra R, Alobid I, Borés-Domenech A et al (2010) Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 31:409–414CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kim MB, Choi J, Lee JK et al (2010) Hearing outcomes according to the types of mastoidectomy: a comparison between canal wall up and canal wall down mastoidectomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 3:203–206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim MB, Choi J, Lee JK et al (2010) Hearing outcomes according to the types of mastoidectomy: a comparison between canal wall up and canal wall down mastoidectomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 3:203–206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Quaranta N, Taliente S, Coppola F, Salonna I (2015) Cartilage ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: hearing results and prognostic factors. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 35:338–342PubMedPubMedCentral Quaranta N, Taliente S, Coppola F, Salonna I (2015) Cartilage ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: hearing results and prognostic factors. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 35:338–342PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Jackson CG, Glasscock ME 3rd, Schwaber MK, Nissen AJ, Christiansen SG, Smith PG (1983) Ossicular chain reconstruction: the TORP and PORP in chronic ear disease. Laryngoscope 93:981–988CrossRefPubMed Jackson CG, Glasscock ME 3rd, Schwaber MK, Nissen AJ, Christiansen SG, Smith PG (1983) Ossicular chain reconstruction: the TORP and PORP in chronic ear disease. Laryngoscope 93:981–988CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Brackmann DE (1993) Tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy: canal wall up procedures. Am J Otol 14:380–382PubMed Brackmann DE (1993) Tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy: canal wall up procedures. Am J Otol 14:380–382PubMed
27.
go back to reference Yu H, He Y, Ni Y, Wang Y, Lu N, Li H (2013) PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:3005–3017 Yu H, He Y, Ni Y, Wang Y, Lu N, Li H (2013) PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:3005–3017
28.
go back to reference Quérat C, Martin C, Prades JM, Richard C (2014) Canal wall up tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. Comparison of hearing results between cartilage and PORP on stapes and impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane by cartilage. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131:211–216CrossRefPubMed Quérat C, Martin C, Prades JM, Richard C (2014) Canal wall up tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. Comparison of hearing results between cartilage and PORP on stapes and impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane by cartilage. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131:211–216CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yung M, Smith P (2010) Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses-a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome. Otol Neurotol 31:752–758CrossRefPubMed Yung M, Smith P (2010) Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses-a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome. Otol Neurotol 31:752–758CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Attanasio G, Gaudio E, Mammola CL, Cagnoni L, De Seta D, Minni A, Covelli E, Filipo R (2014) Autograft ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: a histological study. Acta Otolaryngol 134:1029–1033CrossRefPubMed Attanasio G, Gaudio E, Mammola CL, Cagnoni L, De Seta D, Minni A, Covelli E, Filipo R (2014) Autograft ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: a histological study. Acta Otolaryngol 134:1029–1033CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Galy-Bernadoy C, Akkari M, Mathiolon C, Mondain M, Uziel A, Venail F (2014) Comparison of early hearing outcomes of type 2 ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite bone cement versus other materials. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131:289–292CrossRefPubMed Galy-Bernadoy C, Akkari M, Mathiolon C, Mondain M, Uziel A, Venail F (2014) Comparison of early hearing outcomes of type 2 ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite bone cement versus other materials. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131:289–292CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Bornitz M, Lavcheva Z, Offergeld C (2009) Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies. Otol Neurotol. 30:332–338CrossRefPubMed Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Bornitz M, Lavcheva Z, Offergeld C (2009) Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies. Otol Neurotol. 30:332–338CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Geyer G, Rocker J (2002) Results after rebuilding the ossicular chain using the autogenous incus, ionomer-cement-and titanium implants (tympanoplasty type III). Laryngorhinootologie 81:164–170CrossRefPubMed Geyer G, Rocker J (2002) Results after rebuilding the ossicular chain using the autogenous incus, ionomer-cement-and titanium implants (tympanoplasty type III). Laryngorhinootologie 81:164–170CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Borgstein J, Achbab S (2016) Simple ossicular chain reconstruction during ear surgery using tragal cartilage: a retrospective clinical study in thirty-one patients. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.1111/coa.12624 Borgstein J, Achbab S (2016) Simple ossicular chain reconstruction during ear surgery using tragal cartilage: a retrospective clinical study in thirty-one patients. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.​1111/​coa.​12624
35.
go back to reference Hahn Y, Bojrab DI (2013) Outcomes following ossicular chain reconstruction with composite prostheses: hydroxyapatite-polyethylene vs. hydroxyapatite-titanium. Ear Nose Throat J 92:250, 252, 254 Hahn Y, Bojrab DI (2013) Outcomes following ossicular chain reconstruction with composite prostheses: hydroxyapatite-polyethylene vs. hydroxyapatite-titanium. Ear Nose Throat J 92:250, 252, 254
36.
go back to reference House JW, Teufert KB (2001) Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(3):135–141CrossRefPubMed House JW, Teufert KB (2001) Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(3):135–141CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Shinohara T, Gyo K, Saiki T, Yanagihara N (2000) Ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite prostheses: long-term results. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 25:287–292CrossRefPubMed Shinohara T, Gyo K, Saiki T, Yanagihara N (2000) Ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite prostheses: long-term results. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 25:287–292CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Goldenberg RA, Driver M (2000) Long-term results with hydroxylapatite middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:635–642PubMed Goldenberg RA, Driver M (2000) Long-term results with hydroxylapatite middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:635–642PubMed
39.
go back to reference Chaudhary N, Anand N, Taperwal A, Rai AK (2003) Role of autografts in the reconstruction of ossicular chain in intact canal wall procedures. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 55:157–159PubMedPubMedCentral Chaudhary N, Anand N, Taperwal A, Rai AK (2003) Role of autografts in the reconstruction of ossicular chain in intact canal wall procedures. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 55:157–159PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Yung M (2006) Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure. Otol Neurotol 27:20–26CrossRefPubMed Yung M (2006) Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure. Otol Neurotol 27:20–26CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E (2001) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 22:299–304CrossRefPubMed Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E (2001) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 22:299–304CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Fisch U (1994) Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, and stapes surgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 108–115 Fisch U (1994) Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, and stapes surgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 108–115
44.
go back to reference Black B (1992) Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the SPITE method of assessment. Am J Otol 13:544–551PubMed Black B (1992) Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the SPITE method of assessment. Am J Otol 13:544–551PubMed
45.
go back to reference Malhotra M, Varshney S, Malhotra R (2014) Autologous total ossicular replacement prosthesis. J Laryngol Otol 128:1050–1055CrossRefPubMed Malhotra M, Varshney S, Malhotra R (2014) Autologous total ossicular replacement prosthesis. J Laryngol Otol 128:1050–1055CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Zakzouk A, Bonmardion N, Bouchetemble P, Lerosey Y, Marie JP (2015) Titanium prosthesis or autologous incus for total ossicular reconstruction in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:2653–2657CrossRefPubMed Zakzouk A, Bonmardion N, Bouchetemble P, Lerosey Y, Marie JP (2015) Titanium prosthesis or autologous incus for total ossicular reconstruction in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:2653–2657CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Desaulty A, Shahsavari S, Pasquesoone X (2005) Ossicular reconstruction with autograft in type III. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 126:19–23 Desaulty A, Shahsavari S, Pasquesoone X (2005) Ossicular reconstruction with autograft in type III. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 126:19–23
48.
go back to reference O’Connell BP, Rizk HG, Hutchinson T, Nguyen SA, Lambert PR (2016) Long-term outcomes of titanium ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Epub ahead of print] O’Connell BP, Rizk HG, Hutchinson T, Nguyen SA, Lambert PR (2016) Long-term outcomes of titanium ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Epub ahead of print]
49.
go back to reference Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M (2007) Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:492–498CrossRefPubMed Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M (2007) Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:492–498CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Lee JI, Yoo SH, Lee CW, Song CI, Yoo MH, Park HJ (2015) Short-term hearing results using ossicular replacement prostheses of hydroxyapatite versus titanium. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:2731–2735CrossRefPubMed Lee JI, Yoo SH, Lee CW, Song CI, Yoo MH, Park HJ (2015) Short-term hearing results using ossicular replacement prostheses of hydroxyapatite versus titanium. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:2731–2735CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery
Authors
Sultan Şevik Eliçora
Duygu Erdem
Aykut Erdem Dinç
Murat Damar
Sultan Bişkin
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4350-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2017 Go to the issue