Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2019

01-06-2019 | Technical Note

The effects of bandpass filtering on the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram

Authors: Mercedes Gauthier, Mathieu Gauvin, Jean-Marc Lina, Pierre Lachapelle

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In order to study the OPs, the ERG signal must be filtered to eliminate the low-frequency waves known as the a- and b-waves. Unfortunately, the ISCEV ERG standard does not give clear guidelines on how to proceed apart from indicating that frequencies below 75 Hz should be filtered out when recording scotopic OPs, while no suggestions are offered for the photopic OPs. The purpose of this study was thus to characterize more extensively the effects of various digital filters on the photopic OP waveforms in order to suggest the most appropriate filtering method to record them.

Methods

Filtered OPs (N = 9600 tracings) were extracted from a photopic ERG databank of 40 normal subjects [intensity: 4.4 cd s m−2; background: 30 cd m−2] using 240 different combinations of five digital filters types (Bessel; Butterworth; Elliptic; Chebyshev type 1 and 2), eight bandwidth ranges (50–300; 75–300; 100–300; 125–300; 50–1000; 75–1000; 100–1000; 125–1000 Hz), three filter orders (1, 2 and 5) and with/without phase lag corrections that were generated using MATLAB 2015b. The peak time and the percentage of OPs (sum of OP amplitudes on the b-wave amplitude) were calculated in the time domain (TD%OP).

Results

The timing of the OPs was less affected than the amplitude by the different filters used. Depending on the filter used, the resulting OPs were either severely depressed (16.16% of broadband OP content) or slightly reduced (93.63%). The filters that most successfully eliminated the slow components of the ERG (i.e., < 12% of broadband value) were the Bessel, the Butterworth and the Chebyshev type 1 filters and out of the latter, the Butterworth filter was that which most faithfully reproduced the high-frequency OPs (i.e., > 96%).

Conclusion

Our results vividly demonstrate the need to better define the characteristics of the filter that is used to record the OPs as it does have a significant impact on the resulting waveform.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lachapelle P (1994) The human suprathreshold photopic oscillatory potentials: method of analysis and clinical application. Doc Ophthalmol 88(1):1–25CrossRef Lachapelle P (1994) The human suprathreshold photopic oscillatory potentials: method of analysis and clinical application. Doc Ophthalmol 88(1):1–25CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wachtmeister L (1998) Oscillatory potentials in the retina: what do they reveal. Prog Retin Eye Res 17(4):485–521CrossRef Wachtmeister L (1998) Oscillatory potentials in the retina: what do they reveal. Prog Retin Eye Res 17(4):485–521CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heynen H, Wachtmeister L, van Norren D (1985) Origin of the oscillatory potentials in the primate retina. Vision Res 25(10):1365–1373CrossRef Heynen H, Wachtmeister L, van Norren D (1985) Origin of the oscillatory potentials in the primate retina. Vision Res 25(10):1365–1373CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lachapelle P (1990) Oscillatory potentials as predictors to amplitude and peak time of the photopic b-wave of the human electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 75(1):73–82CrossRef Lachapelle P (1990) Oscillatory potentials as predictors to amplitude and peak time of the photopic b-wave of the human electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 75(1):73–82CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lachapelle P, Rousseau S, McKerral M, Benoit J, Polomeno RC, Koenekoop RK, Little JM (1998) Evidence supportive of a functional discrimination between photopic oscillatory potentials as revealed with cone and rod mediated retinopathies. Doc Ophthalmol 95(1):35–54CrossRef Lachapelle P, Rousseau S, McKerral M, Benoit J, Polomeno RC, Koenekoop RK, Little JM (1998) Evidence supportive of a functional discrimination between photopic oscillatory potentials as revealed with cone and rod mediated retinopathies. Doc Ophthalmol 95(1):35–54CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wachtmeister L (1987) Basic research and clinical aspects of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 66(3):187–194CrossRef Wachtmeister L (1987) Basic research and clinical aspects of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 66(3):187–194CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Marmor MF (1989) An international standard for electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 73(4):299–302CrossRef Marmor MF (1989) An international standard for electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 73(4):299–302CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lachapelle P (2006) The oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. MIT Press, London, pp 565–580 Lachapelle P (2006) The oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. MIT Press, London, pp 565–580
16.
go back to reference Severns ML, Johnson MA, Bresnick GH (1994) Methodologic dependence of electroretinogram oscillatory potential amplitudes. Doc Ophthalmol 86(1):23–31CrossRef Severns ML, Johnson MA, Bresnick GH (1994) Methodologic dependence of electroretinogram oscillatory potential amplitudes. Doc Ophthalmol 86(1):23–31CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rufiange M, Rousseau S, Dembinska O, Lachapelle P (2002) Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the photopic hill revisited. Doc Ophthalmol 104(3):231–248CrossRef Rufiange M, Rousseau S, Dembinska O, Lachapelle P (2002) Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the photopic hill revisited. Doc Ophthalmol 104(3):231–248CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rufiange M, Dassa J, Dembinska O, Koenekoop RK, Little JM, Polomeno RC, Dumont M, Chemtob S, Lachapelle P (2003) The photopic ERG luminance-response function (photopic hill): method of analysis and clinical application. Vision Res 43(12):1405–1412CrossRef Rufiange M, Dassa J, Dembinska O, Koenekoop RK, Little JM, Polomeno RC, Dumont M, Chemtob S, Lachapelle P (2003) The photopic ERG luminance-response function (photopic hill): method of analysis and clinical application. Vision Res 43(12):1405–1412CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effects of bandpass filtering on the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram
Authors
Mercedes Gauthier
Mathieu Gauvin
Jean-Marc Lina
Pierre Lachapelle
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-019-09683-w

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2019 Go to the issue