Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Anesthesiology
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

The effects of adding epinephrine to ropivacaine for popliteal nerve block on the duration of postoperative analgesia: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Karin P.W. Schoenmakers, Maaike G.E. Fenten, Jan Willem Louwerens, Gert Jan Scheffer, Rudolf Stienstra

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Duration of peripheral nerve blocks depends on multiple factors. Both technique and type of local anesthetic used, either with or without adjuncts, may result in different duration times of the block. The purpose of the present study was to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia of 30 mL ropivacaine 0.75 % with or without epinephrine for popliteal sciatic nerve block.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients were included to receive ultrasound guided continuous popliteal nerve block with ropivacaine 0.75 % either without (ROPI) or with epinephrine 5 μg/mL (ROPI-EPI) for ankle fusion, subtalar fusion, or a combination of both. The primary outcome parameter was the duration of postoperative analgesia as reflected by the time to first request for postoperative analgesia (TTFR) through the popliteal nerve catheter. Secondary outcome measures included the onset of sensory and motor block and NRS score for pain at rest and during movement.

Results

Thirty patients, 15 in each group, were studied. Eight patients were withdrawn because of specific withdrawal criteria described in the protocol and replaced according to their group allocation. Median [interquartile range] TTFR was 463 [300–1197] min and 830 [397–1128] min for the ROPI vs ROPI-EPI group respectively. Hodges Lehman median difference between groups was 71 min (95 % CI −415 – 473 min). There was no difference in any clinical outcome measure between the groups.

Conclusion

The results of this study did not show any significant increase in the duration of postoperative analgesia by adding epinephrine to ropivacaine for popliteal nerve block. This may be due to the intrinsic vasoconstrictive properties of ropivacaine. The absence of a significant difference can also be the result of a type II error caused by a large variation in the individual TTFR.

Trial registration

Trial register.nl identifier: NTR3330, keyword TTFR
Literature
1.
Rosenberg PH, Veering BT, Urmey WF. Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: a multifactorial concept. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:564–75.PubMed
2.
Mulroy M, Hejtmanek M. Prevention of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:177–80.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bernards CM, Kopacz DJ. Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans. Anesthesiol. 1999;91:962–8.CrossRef
4.
Liu SS, Salinas FV. Continuous plexus and peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:263–72.PubMed
5.
Lee BB, Ngan Kee WD, Plummer JL, Karmakar MK, Wong AS. The effect of the addition of epinephrine on early systemic absorption of epidural ropivacaine in humans. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:1402–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Ratajczak-Enselme M, Estebe J, Rose F, Wodey E, Malinovsky J, Chevanne F, et al. Effect of epinephrine on epidural, intrathecal, and plasma pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:881–90.
7.
Van Obbergh LJ, Roelants FA, Veyckemans F, Verbeeck RK. In children, the addition of epinephrine modifies the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine injected caudally. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:593–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Karmakar MK, Ho AM, Law BK, Wong AS, Shafer SL, Gin T. Arterial and venous pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine with and without epinephrine after thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiol. 2005;103:704–11.CrossRef
9.
Cederholm I, Anskär S, Bengtsson M. Sensory, motor, and sympathetic block during epidural analgesia with 0.5 % and 0.75 % ropivacaine with and without epinephrine. Reg Anesth. 1994;19:18–33.PubMed
10.
Weber A, Fournier R, Van Gessel E, Riand N, Gamulin Z. Epinephrine does not prolong the analgesia of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5 % or 0.2 % in a femoral three-in-one block. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1327–31.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Schoenmakers KP, Vree T, Jack NT, Van Den Bemt B, Van Limbeek J, Stienstra R. Pharmacokinetics of 450 mg ropivacaine with and without epinephrine for combined femoral and sciatic nerve block in lower extremity surgery. A pilot study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:1321–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Taboada M, Cortés J, Rodríguez J, Ulloa B, Alvarez J, Atanassoff PG. Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa: a comparison between 1.5 % mepivacaine and 0.75 % ropivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:516–20.PubMed
13.
Cederholm I, Evers H, Löfström JB. Skin blood flow after intradermal injection of ropivacaine in various concentrations with and without epinephrine evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry. Reg Anesth. 1992;17:322–8.PubMed
14.
Kopacz DJ, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC. Effect of ropivacaine on cutaneous capillary blood flow in pigs. Anesthesiology. 1989;71:69–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Clendenen SR, Whalen JL. Saphenous nerve innervation of the medial ankle. LRA. 2013;6:13–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effects of adding epinephrine to ropivacaine for popliteal nerve block on the duration of postoperative analgesia: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Karin P.W. Schoenmakers
Maaike G.E. Fenten
Jan Willem Louwerens
Gert Jan Scheffer
Rudolf Stienstra
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0083-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Retrospective evaluation of the effect of carotid artery stenosis on cerebral oxygen saturation during off-pump coronary artery bypasses grafting in adult patients

Case report

Case report of Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy associated with repetitive anaesthesia in a female patient with Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy

Research article

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on porcine right ventricle function assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography

Research article

Early hyperlactatemia predicts pancreatic fistula after surgery

Research article

Computerized physician order entry of a sedation protocol is not associated with improved sedation practice or outcomes in critically ill patients

Research article

Effect-site concentration of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion with and without remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial